Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
Thinking styles are not like horoscopes, which apply to every aspect of a person's life. Instead thinking styles describe a person's core approach to a particular purpose. The point of thinking styles is to recognize that there is a variety of approaches to a purpose, none of which is "better" than another. And thinking styles derive from qual research. This makes thinking styles incredibly powerful for your team and your org. You can easily embrace broader perspectives, invent more, and fill the gaps in your solutions.
Key Insights
-
•
Thinking styles describe people’s cognition within a specific frame or goal, not as universal personality traits.
-
•
Demographics do not reliably predict thinking or decision-making patterns in users.
-
•
The same individual can exhibit multiple thinking styles depending on context or over time.
-
•
Thinking styles include a mix of inner thoughts, emotional reactions, and personal guiding rules.
-
•
Using thinking styles layered over mental model skylines reveals gaps where a product may fail to support certain cognitive approaches.
-
•
Storytelling characters embody thinking styles rather than demographic stereotypes to foster nuanced understanding.
-
•
Designing by thinking style rather than demographic allows better inclusivity for different cognitive needs.
-
•
Friction and adversity in situations often trigger changes in thinking styles, requiring adaptable design.
-
•
Thinking styles are frame-dependent; one person’s style as a caregiver differs from their style as a professional or friend.
-
•
Applying thinking styles to product features and strategy helps align solutions with users’ real lives and intentions.
Notable Quotes
"We are marinating in this assumption that demographic groups define cognition, but they don't."
"Thinking styles are not horoscopes or Myers-Briggs; they only apply within a specific frame of intent or goal."
"If you try to describe a person as 'the grumbler' across all their life, you miss the context and purpose."
"Demographics don’t cause thinking; past experiences, personal rules, and emotions do."
"Your thinking style while caregiving might be ‘Give dignity and agency’ but change as resistance grows."
"Friction in a situation can cause a person to switch thinking styles, not personality types."
"We can use mental model skylines with thinking styles to find support gaps we didn’t see before."
"Casting diverse characters who represent thinking styles breaks down demographic stereotypes."
"A frustrated passenger at a delayed flight might just need acknowledgment, not dismissal."
"Talking about thinking styles is just as easy and fast a shortcut as talking about demographics, but more useful."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"This is a story about what happens when you stop trying to will others to think like you and start creating conditions under which both frames can coexist productively."
Kurt McCullochFaster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
March 10, 2026
"When we design for the edges, we get the middle for free."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
November 18, 2022
"Most service design firms are now focused on digital experience design, close to 70% do that work."
Leah BuleyClosing Plenary: The Crisis of Digital
March 31, 2020
"What responsibility do we have for creating the situation? What agency do we have for making it better?"
Christian CrumlishIntroduction by our Conference Chair
December 6, 2022
"All these traditional ways managers tell employees what to do probably don’t apply in complex problem contexts."
Stephen AndersonPuzzled? How to Coordinate Humans for Complex Challenges
May 27, 2021
"You don’t need a huge planned research study; even two participants can uncover valuable insights."
Gabriela BarnevaOperationalizing Inclusive Design in Service Design
November 20, 2025
"Ethical stress testing subjects AI to hypothetical morally challenging scenarios to ensure alignment with ethical norms."
Jay BustamanteNavigating the Ethical Frontier: DesignOps Strategies for Responsible AI Innovation
October 2, 2023
"We can get quick insights in phases to keep teams engaged and slowly build a complete validity argument."
Chris EngledowlA Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust
April 28, 2023
"It’s impossible to be angry with a warm cup of tea in your hand."
Dave GrayLiminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
May 14, 2015
