Summary
In this panel discussion, Lisa Welchman, Kenneth Bowles, and Dan Rosenberg delved into the evolving role of designers in the age of AI, emphasizing ethical responsibility and the societal impact of design decisions. Kenneth Bowles highlighted the dual nature of responsibility in design—both backward-looking accountability and forward-looking duty—calling for designers to consider not just users but broader social and environmental stakeholders. Dan Rosenberg raised concerns about the ‘faith in the black box’ of AI and the upstream governance needed to prevent harm. The panelists debated the risk of AI commoditizing design roles and disintermediating human judgment. Lisa urged designers to assert agency, understand business deeply, and resist passivity, arguing for bolder engagement with tech’s ethical trajectories. They stressed that human judgment and empathy remain irreplaceable, especially in complex fields like healthcare. The importance of collaboration across silos and anticipatory design to manage AI’s unpredictable error states was also discussed. The panel concluded with encouragement to designers to deepen tech literacy, engage in ethical mitigation early, and shape AI’s future rather than passively accept it.
Key Insights
-
•
Design responsibility extends beyond users to society, environment, and the profession itself, demanding broader ethical consideration.
-
•
AI introduces a risk of commoditizing design work, particularly routine interface tasks that AI can automate within 12 to 36 months.
-
•
Human judgment remains critical and must not be ceded to AI, especially for discriminatory decisions and ethical complexities.
-
•
Understanding and linking design work to business strategy and value is essential for designers to maintain influence at the C-suite level.
-
•
Designers have significant agency but must proactively engage with AI technologies to shape their trajectory rather than resist passively.
-
•
Cross-disciplinary collaboration, especially between designers and data scientists, is necessary but challenged by entrenched organizational silos.
-
•
Designers should anticipate and design for AI error states, recognizing generative AI’s infinite unpredictability.
-
•
Techno-determinism is a pervasive risk; designers must challenge the inevitability mindset by actively influencing AI's ethical direction now.
-
•
Empathy and the embodied human experience are unique human factors that AI may fake but cannot replicate authentically.
-
•
Elevating UX roles upstream into product strategy and business leadership can help protect against devaluation due to AI automation.
Notable Quotes
"Designers have obligations not just to users but also to society and our own profession."
"We often point fingers at the person making the most money from the mess that designers put through the system."
"Faith in the black box makes me uneasy; as designers, we must care about what happens behind the scenes."
"I don’t think any designers today would hand over judgmental decisions fully to AI."
"If you don’t understand business, you don’t deserve a seat at the C-suite table."
"People remember how you made them feel, and that’s something AI can fake but not truly replicate."
"The risk is that AI will cut designers out of decision making because it’s perceived as cheaper or faster."
"Middle management often blocks collaboration despite desires from people underneath to work together."
"We need to design for the many error states generative AI can produce, however unpredictable."
"Technology does not have a mind of its own; people with power set its trajectory and we can influence that."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
More Videos
"Designers adhere to standards not scientific ones, but design rigor tailored to dealing with complexity."
Yoel SumitroActions and Reflections: Bridging the Skills Gap among Researchers
March 9, 2022
"If you are silent about your pain, they will kill you and say you enjoyed it."
Zariah CameronReDesigning Wellbeing for Equitable Care in the Workplace
September 23, 2024
"Professional development budgets get cut first in tough times, yet skill building is more important than ever."
Doug PowellDesignOps and the Next Frontier: Leading Through Unpredictable Change
September 11, 2025
"It takes at least one member of a team to choose to set healthy standards for collaboration."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"To innovate smarter, you need to get access to the roadmap as early as possible and start research even when not asked for it."
Mike OrenWhy Pharmaceutical's Research Model Should Replace Design Thinking
March 28, 2023
"My job is to make the head of design look super good."
Jacqui FreyScale is Social Work
March 19, 2020
"Clear and consistent communication really keeps design leadership accountable and promotes transparency via knowledge sharing."
Kim Holt Emma Wylds Pearl Koppenhaver Maisee XiongA Salesforce Panel Discussion on Values-Driven DesignOps
September 8, 2022
"You own the design system, which gives you the unique ability to integrate that accessibility thinking into all of your components."
Samuel ProulxFrom Standards to Innovation: Why Inclusive Design Wins
September 10, 2025
"If something was unclear or uncomfortable to even one person, it was a sign it needed editing."
Laine Riley ProkayHow DesignOps can Drive Inclusive Career Ladders for All
September 30, 2021
