How to Coach Enterprise Experimentation
Summary
In this talk, Alyssa Briggs shares her experience coaching enterprise experimentation, emphasizing that experimentation is a mindset for problem-solving by validating assumptions through small, fast tests. She highlights that executives often support experimentation in theory but struggle to embed it into daily work. Using Intuit as a case study, Briggs illustrates how simply training and embedding experiment coaches within teams transformed the company’s culture, enabling tens of thousands of experiments annually that generate millions in revenue. She describes three essential practices for experiment coaches: collaboratively planning experiments using an experiment grid, helping teams embrace and learn from failures by facing data honestly and conducting quick customer research, and catalyzing organizational change by spreading the coaching role and uncovering new opportunities for experimentation beyond product design. Briggs walks the audience through a live experiment about a name memory trick to demonstrate how to develop hypotheses and validate assumptions quickly. She also recounts a story where a small sales experiment disproved executives’ skepticism about a new product tier, leading to significant business impact and wider cultural adoption of experimentation. Briggs encourages everyone to adopt the experiment coaching mindset and start running small experiments to shift team behaviors and company culture.
Key Insights
-
•
Embedding experiment coaches within existing teams is key to sustaining a culture of experimentation.
-
•
Experimentation thrives on embracing small failures to avoid costly large ones.
-
•
Executives often support experimentation top-down, but real change happens when coaches integrate experiments into daily workflows.
-
•
The experiment grid is a powerful yet simple tool for collaboratively planning experiments by unpacking assumptions and defining testable hypotheses.
-
•
Most teams fail their first experiment, and coaches must help them face the data and learn rather than become discouraged.
-
•
Quick, informal customer research after an experiment helps uncover root causes and increases team engagement.
-
•
Consistently planning follow-up experiments builds momentum and prevents the 'one-and-done' pitfall.
-
•
Experiment coaching is not a full-time role but can be integrated as 10-20% of a team member’s responsibilities.
-
•
Experiments can test not just products but internal processes and business assumptions, unlocking broader innovation.
-
•
Demonstrating successful experiments with quantitative data can transform executive skepticism into enthusiastic support, driving significant business impact.
Notable Quotes
"If you’re afraid of failure, that’s okay. With experimentation, you’re going to fail—but in little tiny ways that don’t really matter."
"Executives get experimentation but often it doesn’t stick when people go back to their normal teams."
"The simple thing that worked at Intuit was training and embedding experiment coaches in teams."
"An experiment coach spends about 10 to 20 percent of their time helping the team change mindsets and actions."
"The most important tool is not for running experiments, but for planning them—the experiment grid."
"If we do X, then Y percent of people will do Z—that’s how you frame hypotheses to learn from both success and failure."
"It’s better to run lots of quick, cheap experiments to remove doubt than to wait for the perfect, statistically significant test."
"Nine out of ten teams fail their first experiment, which is normal but can be demoralizing."
"Helping your team face the data honestly and then diving into customer conversations helps uncover what went wrong."
"You know you’ve succeeded as a coach when you put yourself out of a job by giving away the role."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Every innovation carries responsibility; we must tread carefully with AI in health."
Vincent BrathwaiteOpener: Past, Present, and Future—Closing the Racial Divide in Design Teams
October 22, 2020
"We keep our team honest about where we are and where we need to improve — transparency and accountability."
Changying (Z) ZhengNavigating Innovation with Integrity
September 25, 2024
"The era of 100-page reports is ending because we simply can’t produce them fast enough at scale."
Lija Hogan Milan Mijatovic Sam Proulx Louis RosenfeldThree Years Out: Perspectives on the Near-Term Future of User Research
March 15, 2024
"I can’t think of a single screen reader user who uses the default out-of-the-box configuration."
Sam ProulxUnderstanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
March 27, 2023
"We use the RICE method—reach, impact, confidence divided by effort—to prioritize customer requests in our sprints."
Smitha Papolu Nova Wehman-Brown Melissa Schmidt Adam MenterTheme 3 Discussion
June 4, 2019
"Sometimes the screening can be done incorrectly by panels, which leads to wasted time and potential data issues."
Roberta Dombrowski Lianna Aduana5 Reasons to Bring your Recruiting in House
September 30, 2021
"You don’t have to build a game; maybe you want to build a toy for your cat or a lamp—it just has to be yours."
Kritika SonyMoving AI offscreen: Exploring failures, constraints, and recovery in physical game design
June 10, 2026
"Doomsday and alarmist messaging just make people feel helpless rather than empowered."
Mike Brzozowski Laura Palotie Steve Isley Nancy TsangUX in everyday products: Empowering climate conscious choices
July 17, 2024
"We can’t be there for every behavior after the nudge, nor do we necessarily want to be."
Marieke McCloskeyUser Science: Product Analytics & User Research
March 11, 2021
