Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
How to create actionable insight in the face of politics and silos [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
Summary
Three of your research colleagues discussed and defended their respective positions on creating actionable insight in the face of politics and silos. Pariticipants then engaged with them in a discussion and Q&A, facilitated by Robin Beers. “In organizations that may not incentivize informed decision-making, researchers need to study power dynamics, cultivate their political influence, and consistently communicate their value to the business.” – Sonja Bobrowska “AI tools will change the way people consume researchers, relying more and more on receiving personalized summaries. This will only exacerbate silos and lead to miscommunication. To avoid this, the best skill researchers can learn is creating compelling visual frameworks rather than weighty reports.” – Mujtaba Hameed “The best report and presentation ever do not necessarily mean your findings will be adopted. Insights virtually don’t exist if you aren’t able to make them stick by putting them to work.” – Josh Morales
Key Insights
-
•
Actionable insights are not just immediate decisions but include long-term organizational adoption and mindset shifts.
-
•
Time is essential for research findings to be digested and become actionable, sometimes taking years.
-
•
Building relationships and trust within organizations is key for researchers to influence decision-making effectively.
-
•
Researchers often perform 'invisible work' akin to political navigation to understand power flows and align insights.
-
•
Conflict from research crossing silos is not necessarily bad and can be a catalyst for better cross-team collaboration.
-
•
Success in research impact can be defined as enabling clients to gain influence and seat at decision-making tables.
-
•
Embedding researchers within product teams enhances collaboration and increases the likelihood of insights being used.
-
•
Different organizational cultures require experimentation with communication styles for insights to resonate.
-
•
Researchers should set low expectations and not take failures in insight adoption personally due to factors beyond their control.
-
•
Understanding organizational history and power structures supports more believable and impactful research narratives.
Notable Quotes
"If we only measure actionable insights by immediate changes, we are losing a lot of the power that research has."
"The one ingredient that made some of the insights work was simply time."
"I don’t care about what’s actionable for a company. I care about what’s actionable for my client’s career and influence."
"Insights virtually don’t exist if you aren’t able to make them stick by putting them to work."
"You need to build relationships and understand who needs to be convinced and what convinces them."
"Conflict is not bad if it leads to something more sustainable and teams realizing they work together."
"Silos naturally create power through isolation, so it’s helpful to think of them as a staple and work with them."
"The researchers’ work is just the tip of the iceberg; the invisible work is about politics, power, and relationships."
"If you have a terrible boss, you can do an ethnography of your own organization disguised as friendly connection."
"We need the serenity to accept things we cannot change and the courage to change what we can, and the wisdom to know the difference."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The future is now, it’s just not evenly distributed."
Dave Malouf Patrizia Bertini Jon FukudaThe Past, Present, and Future of DesignOps: a 2-part DesignOps Community Call (Part 2)
April 28, 2022
"Participatory social infrastructure must be radically inclusive, decolonizing, and generative for communities to flourish."
Jayne Engle Tanya Chung-Tiam-FookCivic Design for the Next Seven Generations—A Discussion on Sacred Civics
August 25, 2022
"We’re in a stage where AI is causing an explosion of crazy uses that are not very good right now, like the early days of laser printing."
Frances Yllana Jorge Arango Maria Taylor Briana ThomasThe Big Question about Impact: A Panel Discussion
September 24, 2024
"Our Western view of power worked well in the US and Canada but didn’t play well everywhere else."
Joi FreemanA New Vantage Point: Building a Pipeline for Multifaceted Research(ers)
March 30, 2020
"Stress makes us stupid because our creative thinking gets cloudy when under pressure."
Laura WeissTurn Down the Heat: 3 Ways to Handle Conflict in the Moment
November 20, 2024
"Teaching others through hands-on projects and training sessions creates long-term advocates and grows your design footprint."
Stephanie WadeBuilding and Sustaining Design in Government
December 8, 2021
"Design always has to take the step forward in some way, whereas product people just go about their day and do their thing."
Dave Malouf Meredith Black Farid SabitovThe Past, Present, and Future of DesignOps: a 2-part DesignOps Community Call (Part 1)
February 17, 2022
"Science cultures like CERN have a huge headwind against adopting design measurement tools because of skepticism."
Panel Discussion: Communicating the Value of DesignOps
November 7, 2018
"Choosing a research repository is a big battle in your organization; the right decisions can really help you succeed."
Sofia QuinteroThe Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ
March 10, 2021
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are the main categories of survey tools and how do they differ in use cases?
How can firsthand client involvement in field research contribute to long-term advocacy and support for ethnographic methods?
How does Rosenbot integrate supplemental content like videos and book info with its answers?