Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
If you’ve followed LinkedIn of late, it’s clear that UX researchers are frustrated. They feel their work is undervalued, their strategic contributions are marginalized, and their jobs have been made redundant. Multiple fingers have been pointed in multiple directions, and—as you’d expect from social media—the discussion has often ended up in a decidedly sour place. In light of The big design freakout and the UX research reckoning, there is an important conversation to be had about the changing roles of research, design, and product, and where we go from here. In light of this, Rosenfeld’s Advancing Research community is hosting a panel of respected, collaborative, and opinionated experts from the disciplines/functions at the core of this changing dynamic: Jamika Burge, Teresa Torres, Robert Fabricant, Noam Segal, and Peter Merholz—to stop litigating the past, and engage in a positive, constructive conversation about the future of UX research. Panelists: Jamika Burge, Robert Fabricant, Noam Segal, Teresa Torres Moderated by: Peter Merholz
Key Insights
-
•
Aligning user research outcomes with business goals is critical for demonstrating research value.
-
•
AI offers opportunities for continuous discovery but raises concerns over bias and ethical transparency.
-
•
Democratizing research involves enabling non-researchers to conduct basic studies, freeing skilled researchers for complex tasks.
-
•
A mature organizational environment is necessary to successfully democratize research without sacrificing quality.
-
•
Research quality can be evaluated using reliability and validity concepts adapted from academia.
-
•
Not all research activities require advanced skills; even product managers can be trained in targeted, simple research types.
-
•
Organizational change management is as important as research execution for advancing user-focused practices.
-
•
The UX research community debates moving past the term 'democratization' to focus on evolving roles amidst technological change.
-
•
Measuring UX research value is complex because impact permeates across teams and is less quantifiable than engineering outputs.
-
•
Despite evolving roles and tools, there will always be a need for specialized, skilled researchers for longitudinal and rigorous studies.
Notable Quotes
"How do we show the value of the work that enables us to really advocate for the humans whom we are serving?"
"Building for humans is a huge challenge because humans are multi-layered, weird, and wonderful irrational creatures."
"If we are truly going to create customer-centric organizations, every single person needs firsthand exposure to customers."
"Democratization has been happening for over 20 years and it’s only going to keep happening."
"User research itself is not a single function but many disciplines that require integrity and stewardship."
"We need to move past the point of who does what and into how our roles are changing with technology."
"We know what is not good research, but defining and communicating what good research looks like is more challenging."
"The ultimate measure of our research is its impact—did we build the right thing and did it have the expected effect?"
"Organizational change management requires as much care and effort as executing good research."
"There is always more work to be done than we will ever be able to do, so enabling others to participate is beneficial."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We needed to revise our plan; we couldn’t just keep adding talented folks and hope everything falls into place."
Sarah Kinkade Mariana Ortiz-ReyesDesign Management Models in the Face of Transformation
June 8, 2022
"When you think about change, there’s pushing to help people get through, pulling to bring people along, and then just letting it happen."
Kristin SkinnerTheme 1 Intro
September 29, 2021
"When communicating with sign language interpreters remotely, remember to address the participant directly, not the interpreter."
Rebecca ToppsPlanning and conducting remote usability studies for accessibility
September 10, 2020
"Designing enterprise software is not just complicated to use, it’s really complicated to design."
Robert ReimannTaming Design Complexity with UX Models
June 8, 2017
"Think about what your manager is being rewarded for to figure out how to better support them and your team."
Ellen ChisaThe Values of Design
November 29, 2023
"Nobody is going to be satisfied by insight-shaped answers or high-level summaries masquerading as breakthroughs."
Laura KleinHuman vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
March 11, 2026
"Many big companies now have roles related to ecosystem design like VP or senior managers of ecosystem."
Cornelius RachieruHandling Complexity: Framing a Scale of Design
June 9, 2021
"Building a design system is really about breaking big problems into smaller parts that have real value."
Nathan CurtisDesign Systems for Us: How Many One-Source(s)-of-Truth Are Enough?
January 17, 2019
"The only way to get outside your bubble is to act as if an alternative belief is true and test it."
Dave GrayLiminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
May 14, 2015
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Why is human synthesis and collaboration still critical despite AI advancements in research?
What setup is required for AI tools to incorporate broader organizational context into research analysis?
What are the current limitations of AI regarding research context and participant environment observations?