Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
If you’ve followed LinkedIn of late, it’s clear that UX researchers are frustrated. They feel their work is undervalued, their strategic contributions are marginalized, and their jobs have been made redundant. Multiple fingers have been pointed in multiple directions, and—as you’d expect from social media—the discussion has often ended up in a decidedly sour place. In light of The big design freakout and the UX research reckoning, there is an important conversation to be had about the changing roles of research, design, and product, and where we go from here. In light of this, Rosenfeld’s Advancing Research community is hosting a panel of respected, collaborative, and opinionated experts from the disciplines/functions at the core of this changing dynamic: Jamika Burge, Teresa Torres, Robert Fabricant, Noam Segal, and Peter Merholz—to stop litigating the past, and engage in a positive, constructive conversation about the future of UX research. Panelists: Jamika Burge, Robert Fabricant, Noam Segal, Teresa Torres Moderated by: Peter Merholz
Key Insights
-
•
Aligning user research outcomes with business goals is critical for demonstrating research value.
-
•
AI offers opportunities for continuous discovery but raises concerns over bias and ethical transparency.
-
•
Democratizing research involves enabling non-researchers to conduct basic studies, freeing skilled researchers for complex tasks.
-
•
A mature organizational environment is necessary to successfully democratize research without sacrificing quality.
-
•
Research quality can be evaluated using reliability and validity concepts adapted from academia.
-
•
Not all research activities require advanced skills; even product managers can be trained in targeted, simple research types.
-
•
Organizational change management is as important as research execution for advancing user-focused practices.
-
•
The UX research community debates moving past the term 'democratization' to focus on evolving roles amidst technological change.
-
•
Measuring UX research value is complex because impact permeates across teams and is less quantifiable than engineering outputs.
-
•
Despite evolving roles and tools, there will always be a need for specialized, skilled researchers for longitudinal and rigorous studies.
Notable Quotes
"How do we show the value of the work that enables us to really advocate for the humans whom we are serving?"
"Building for humans is a huge challenge because humans are multi-layered, weird, and wonderful irrational creatures."
"If we are truly going to create customer-centric organizations, every single person needs firsthand exposure to customers."
"Democratization has been happening for over 20 years and it’s only going to keep happening."
"User research itself is not a single function but many disciplines that require integrity and stewardship."
"We need to move past the point of who does what and into how our roles are changing with technology."
"We know what is not good research, but defining and communicating what good research looks like is more challenging."
"The ultimate measure of our research is its impact—did we build the right thing and did it have the expected effect?"
"Organizational change management requires as much care and effort as executing good research."
"There is always more work to be done than we will ever be able to do, so enabling others to participate is beneficial."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Empathy is our greatest asset but it takes up a lot of emotional bandwidth that we must consciously manage."
Brian MossWhat Does it Mean to be a Resilient Research Team?
March 9, 2022
"No research method is perfect; use a mix and triangulate results depending on whether you want to predict or explain."
Michaela MoraAdvanced Concept Testing Approaches To Guide Product Development and Business Decisions
March 11, 2022
"Nudges are not a magic wand; they can help but need to fit within a larger system and behavioral pathway to truly work."
Amy BucherHarnessing behavioral science to uncover deeper truths
March 12, 2025
"Organizational change is less about the what and more about the how, showing the organization how to change."
Alana Washington(Remote) Service Design: A Transformation Case Study
June 8, 2022
"Stakeholders began referring to user groups by name—humanizing conversations and keeping us focused."
Dharani PereraThe mandala of service design: unlocking alignment and action through service design
November 20, 2025
"Never forget the individual. People are less predictable than algorithms, but they’ll get you through change."
Brenna FallonLearning Over Outcomes
October 24, 2019
"By bringing truth to power is how we bring excellence to our craft and define our value."
Jemma AhmedTheme 2 Intro
March 26, 2024
"It's not the demographics or names that should drive personas, but what people are really trying to do."
Lija HoganContexts of Use: A Framework for Connection
December 9, 2021
"Sometimes alignment work isn’t enjoyable, but it’s part of the job for design system success."
Nathan CurtisBeyond the Toolkit: Spreading a System Across People & Products
June 9, 2016
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Why does AI still fall short in fully automating proposal writing for bespoke research projects?
How can teams create lightweight visibility systems that improve workload transparency without reducing productivity?
How can I use an AI chatbot like Rosenbot to get quick answers on UX and product design topics?