Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
A Genuine Conversation about the Future of UX Research
Summary
If you’ve followed LinkedIn of late, it’s clear that UX researchers are frustrated. They feel their work is undervalued, their strategic contributions are marginalized, and their jobs have been made redundant. Multiple fingers have been pointed in multiple directions, and—as you’d expect from social media—the discussion has often ended up in a decidedly sour place. In light of The big design freakout and the UX research reckoning, there is an important conversation to be had about the changing roles of research, design, and product, and where we go from here. In light of this, Rosenfeld’s Advancing Research community is hosting a panel of respected, collaborative, and opinionated experts from the disciplines/functions at the core of this changing dynamic: Jamika Burge, Teresa Torres, Robert Fabricant, Noam Segal, and Peter Merholz—to stop litigating the past, and engage in a positive, constructive conversation about the future of UX research. Panelists: Jamika Burge, Robert Fabricant, Noam Segal, Teresa Torres Moderated by: Peter Merholz
Key Insights
-
•
Aligning user research outcomes with business goals is critical for demonstrating research value.
-
•
AI offers opportunities for continuous discovery but raises concerns over bias and ethical transparency.
-
•
Democratizing research involves enabling non-researchers to conduct basic studies, freeing skilled researchers for complex tasks.
-
•
A mature organizational environment is necessary to successfully democratize research without sacrificing quality.
-
•
Research quality can be evaluated using reliability and validity concepts adapted from academia.
-
•
Not all research activities require advanced skills; even product managers can be trained in targeted, simple research types.
-
•
Organizational change management is as important as research execution for advancing user-focused practices.
-
•
The UX research community debates moving past the term 'democratization' to focus on evolving roles amidst technological change.
-
•
Measuring UX research value is complex because impact permeates across teams and is less quantifiable than engineering outputs.
-
•
Despite evolving roles and tools, there will always be a need for specialized, skilled researchers for longitudinal and rigorous studies.
Notable Quotes
"How do we show the value of the work that enables us to really advocate for the humans whom we are serving?"
"Building for humans is a huge challenge because humans are multi-layered, weird, and wonderful irrational creatures."
"If we are truly going to create customer-centric organizations, every single person needs firsthand exposure to customers."
"Democratization has been happening for over 20 years and it’s only going to keep happening."
"User research itself is not a single function but many disciplines that require integrity and stewardship."
"We need to move past the point of who does what and into how our roles are changing with technology."
"We know what is not good research, but defining and communicating what good research looks like is more challenging."
"The ultimate measure of our research is its impact—did we build the right thing and did it have the expected effect?"
"Organizational change management requires as much care and effort as executing good research."
"There is always more work to be done than we will ever be able to do, so enabling others to participate is beneficial."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"I want to see us running companies that prize curiosity over confidence, making decisions based on users’ unmet needs rather than business assumptions."
Chris GeisonWhat is Research Strategy?
March 11, 2021
"We haven’t just invited them, we’ve set the damn table, and sometimes we have to host the damn party."
Jacqui Frey Alison RandSetting the Table for Dynamic Change
October 24, 2019
"A living systems lens urges us to see wholes, holes, and interdependent relationships in organizations."
Robin BeersNavigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change
March 13, 2025
"People tend to believe technology has been good for themselves but murkier or negative for broader society."
Cennydd BowlesResponsible Design in Reality
June 9, 2021
"Who are we excluding? That is the better question to ask when talking about inclusive design."
Saara Kamppari-MillerInclusive Design is DesignOps
September 29, 2021
"The best experiences are the ones that start to be relevant around who we are, recognizing where we are and what we’re trying to accomplish."
Greg PetroffSoftware as Material—A Redux
June 6, 2023
"The Slack channel is the fastest way to get help, whether you’re virtual or in person."
Bria Alexander Louis RosenfeldOpening Remarks Day 1
March 25, 2024
"Working in agile keeps our teams nimble and able to adapt to frequent reevaluations and shifting priorities."
Laureen Kattan Julie KimCentering Patients and Clinicians in a Complex Government Ecosystem
November 29, 2023
"Sprint as theater is not going to result in a product concept that really represents human needs, behaviors, and attitudes."
Anne MamaghaniHow Your Organization's Generative Workshops Are Probably Going Wrong and How to Get Them Right
March 28, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What strategies help reframe the difficult business development work when going independent?
In what ways do rough sketches invite iteration rather than defensiveness compared to polished diagrams?
How can senior designers coach junior designers to maintain intentional design decisions while using AI?