Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
A Genuine Conversation about the Future of UX Research
Summary
If you’ve followed LinkedIn of late, it’s clear that UX researchers are frustrated. They feel their work is undervalued, their strategic contributions are marginalized, and their jobs have been made redundant. Multiple fingers have been pointed in multiple directions, and—as you’d expect from social media—the discussion has often ended up in a decidedly sour place. In light of The big design freakout and the UX research reckoning, there is an important conversation to be had about the changing roles of research, design, and product, and where we go from here. In light of this, Rosenfeld’s Advancing Research community is hosting a panel of respected, collaborative, and opinionated experts from the disciplines/functions at the core of this changing dynamic: Jamika Burge, Teresa Torres, Robert Fabricant, Noam Segal, and Peter Merholz—to stop litigating the past, and engage in a positive, constructive conversation about the future of UX research. Panelists: Jamika Burge, Robert Fabricant, Noam Segal, Teresa Torres Moderated by: Peter Merholz
Key Insights
-
•
Aligning user research outcomes with business goals is critical for demonstrating research value.
-
•
AI offers opportunities for continuous discovery but raises concerns over bias and ethical transparency.
-
•
Democratizing research involves enabling non-researchers to conduct basic studies, freeing skilled researchers for complex tasks.
-
•
A mature organizational environment is necessary to successfully democratize research without sacrificing quality.
-
•
Research quality can be evaluated using reliability and validity concepts adapted from academia.
-
•
Not all research activities require advanced skills; even product managers can be trained in targeted, simple research types.
-
•
Organizational change management is as important as research execution for advancing user-focused practices.
-
•
The UX research community debates moving past the term 'democratization' to focus on evolving roles amidst technological change.
-
•
Measuring UX research value is complex because impact permeates across teams and is less quantifiable than engineering outputs.
-
•
Despite evolving roles and tools, there will always be a need for specialized, skilled researchers for longitudinal and rigorous studies.
Notable Quotes
"How do we show the value of the work that enables us to really advocate for the humans whom we are serving?"
"Building for humans is a huge challenge because humans are multi-layered, weird, and wonderful irrational creatures."
"If we are truly going to create customer-centric organizations, every single person needs firsthand exposure to customers."
"Democratization has been happening for over 20 years and it’s only going to keep happening."
"User research itself is not a single function but many disciplines that require integrity and stewardship."
"We need to move past the point of who does what and into how our roles are changing with technology."
"We know what is not good research, but defining and communicating what good research looks like is more challenging."
"The ultimate measure of our research is its impact—did we build the right thing and did it have the expected effect?"
"Organizational change management requires as much care and effort as executing good research."
"There is always more work to be done than we will ever be able to do, so enabling others to participate is beneficial."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The design project tracker used 1900 Excel functions mostly for capacity planning in quarterly design cycles."
Peter BoersmaHow to Define and Maintain a DesignOps Roadmap
October 3, 2023
"We should feel okay to throw away old assumptions and tooling and invent new techniques for this new world."
Peter Van DijckBuilding the Rosenbot
June 4, 2024
"Ambiguity is considered a problematic in design, but ambiguity can be a feature."
Lori Muszynski Peter MerholzKeeping Design Weird
October 2, 2023
"Leadership is about being a transparent umbrella, shielding teams from chaos while keeping them informed."
Ted NewardTheme 4: Enterprise Organizational Journey
June 4, 2019
"Friction in a situation can cause a person to switch thinking styles, not personality types."
Indi YoungThinking styles: Mend hidden cracks in your market
January 8, 2025
"Low UX maturity is often a symptom of a bigger problem in how you build product, not just design adoption."
Bob Baxley Sara Asche Anderson Sharon Bautista Frank Duran Jamie Kaspszak Abbey Smalley Sylas SouzaTheme 4: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"Language is critical to shared understanding and shared context."
Husani OakleyTheme Two Intro
June 6, 2023
"The team doesn’t understand who’s responsible for what or the difference between a design manager and a design lead."
Dianne QueReal Talk: Proving Value through a Scrappy Playbook
October 23, 2019
"When we say if only I could get that executive to think differently, we’re actually giving them power over us."
Matt LeMayYou Don’t “Get” Anyone to Do Anything
December 6, 2022
