Summary
Inclusive design can be aspirational, but how do you translate that into every day practice? Service Designers need processes, metrics, and repeatability to move from intent to impact. In this session, we’ll explore practical ways to embed inclusive research and testing into every stage of the design cycle, from discovery research with assistive technology users to establishing a repeated testing cycle, benchmarking the process, and sustainable post-launch practices. You’ll leave with a clear playbook for scaling inclusive design through workflows, training, and culture. Make accessibility a measurable, repeatable part of how your team delivers great services for everyone.
Key Insights
-
•
Inclusive design in digital products directly impacts the success of the entire service journey since services are only as inclusive as their weakest touchpoint.
-
•
Accessibility is often considered too late in product cycles, making fixes costly and difficult.
-
•
Testing accessibility at the design system component level uncovers issues early and enables consistent reuse of best practices.
-
•
Including people with disabilities in generative and usability research enriches design decisions and soaks inclusion into the foundation.
-
•
Operationalizing inclusive design requires embedding accessibility standards, templates, checklists, and metrics into existing workflows rather than creating isolated efforts.
-
•
Moderated research sessions with assistive tech users reveal deeper insights than unmoderated methods, uncovering why users struggle, not just what.
-
•
Democratizing accessibility knowledge across roles—designers, developers, researchers—builds confidence and scales inclusive practices more effectively.
-
•
Creating shared review spaces like ‘watch parties’ fosters empathy, awareness, and aligned understanding of accessibility challenges among teams.
-
•
Start small by engaging just a few assistive tech users to make meaningful progress; large studies aren’t always necessary.
-
•
Disability is a dynamic state that anyone can join, reinforcing the need for products that serve a broad range of users including temporary or situational disabilities.
Notable Quotes
"Service experiences are only as inclusive as their weakest checkpoint."
"Inclusive products reduce friction across customer support and operations by improving consistency across channels."
"Disability isn’t a fixed group — aging, illness, injury can put anyone into a disabled state."
"Operationalizing inclusive research helps teams navigate the messy, nonlinear reality of maturing accessibility practices."
"Testing accessibility at the design system level before design starts catches many issues early on."
"You don’t need a huge planned research study; even two participants can uncover valuable insights."
"Don’t be afraid to not know something. Let assistive technology users teach you."
"Design annotations in handoffs prevent accessibility details from getting lost between designers and developers."
"If we design for the margins, we get the middle for free."
"Leadership buy-in is critical to champion inclusive design and drive product innovation and culture change."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Allow space for participants to demonstrate expertise before digging deeper in interviews."
Sam Ladner Megan Blocker Tanvi Dhond Katie Hansen Ricardo MartinsMethodologies: Beyond the interview [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
September 4, 2024
"We believe cognitive biases like frequency bias and expectation bias affected how users perceived AI errors over time."
Jennifer KongJourneying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare
June 5, 2024
"Involving designers early in the process is crucial to avoid the 'fast-food' model where they feel like order takers."
Alicia MootyDesign Staffing Models
September 30, 2021
"You need two tiers of personas: broad roles at the suite level and detailed flavors at the module level."
Robert ReimannTaming Design Complexity with UX Models
June 8, 2017
"The evolution in AI UIs is ongoing and rapid, and we’re still figuring out what the final form of AI-native applications looks like."
Luke WroblewskiDesigning AI Applications
March 5, 2026
"If the survey wording changes, measuring change over time becomes difficult, but improving the survey builds trust."
Chris EngledowlA Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust
April 28, 2023
"Organizations are slow to adopt the practice of making every decision from the voice of the customer, despite having talented people and data."
Mike Oren Janice WiitalaDesign Research Strategy & Strategic Design Research
February 3, 2022
"OKRs can sometimes suck the oxygen out of the room if they focus only on bottom-line results, missing process and experience."
Bria Alexander Benson Low Natalya Pemberton Stephanie GoldthorpeOKRs—Helpful or Harmful?
January 20, 2022
"It’s a love-hate relationship with AI because it can make us more efficient but also devalue our work."
Llewyn PaineDay 1 Using AI in UX with Impact
June 10, 2025
