Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
This past summer, 763 responded to a series of questions Peter Merholz posted, meant to reveal just how healthy their UX/Design organizations are. The top finding: Individual designers are fulfilled, but their organizations aren't giving them or their teams the support they need to do their best work. Additionally intriguing: there seems to be a sweet spot for org size, certain departments house UX/Design better than others, and the company type that most supports health has been on the decline for 20 years. Join Peter Merholz as we dig into the research, unpack the paradox, and chart a course toward healthier, more effective design teams. If you care about UX organizations not just surviving, but truly thriving, join us for this discussion.
Key Insights
-
•
Designers feel confident and proud about the quality of work they themselves produce despite organizational constraints.
-
•
Most companies lack clear career pathing and career development support for UX and design professionals.
-
•
Insufficient staffing and lack of time to focus on work strongly correlate with high burnout rates among designers.
-
•
Many design teams do not have explicit, robust standards of design quality comparable to engineering or product management standards.
-
•
Reporting lines deeply affect team health: design teams reporting directly to CEOs or digital departments report better organizational health than those under engineering or marketing.
-
•
Professional services and consulting environments yield the happiest and healthiest design teams despite typically lower pay.
-
•
Design organizations sized roughly between 30 and 150 members strike a balance between growth opportunity and avoiding bureaucratic overhead.
-
•
The traditional roles in UX and design are blurring or becoming obsolete, complicating career architectures and growth paths.
-
•
Designers often bring an idealistic mindset that clashes with corporate bureaucracy and pragmatic cultures, which may underpin some dissatisfaction.
-
•
There is a renewed interest in the experience architect role, now often evolving within service design practices, which are distinct yet related to UX design teams.
Notable Quotes
"No s**t designers burnout more than any other function."
"I feel good about the work I do, but my company doesn't ship good work."
"Most organizations don't care that design has an explicit standard of quality."
"Design teams reporting through engineering tend to have the worst quality scores."
"The farther away you are from the CEO or GM, the less happy and healthy your organization tends to be."
"Smaller design orgs rate high on some health indicators but often have no growth path; very large orgs get bogged down by bureaucracy."
"Design as a function is empathetic and human-centered, corporations are calculating and bureaucratic; integrating these value systems takes effort."
"Career growth is mostly about skills development, responsibility, and influence rather than just compensation or titles."
"Many designers don't understand corporate realities and thus have an idealistic view that clashes with organizational constraints."
"Design roles are blurring or dead; super senior individual contributor roles are emerging as a new career path."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"It’s not answers we’re after but further questions to keep the conversation and understanding alive."
Soma Ghosh Savina Hawkins Dave Hoffer Rob Thomas Victor UdoewaWhat emerging methods are advancing UX research [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
September 28, 2023
"VoiceOver gestures like swipe right move the focus through elements; double tap activates them."
Sam ProulxUnderstanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
October 2, 2023
"Agents often have fascinating second or third career backgrounds that unlock deeper research insights."
Kayla Farrell Chelsey Glasson Sean Fitzell Jared LeClercWhat It's Like To Be a User Researcher at Compass
March 12, 2021
"The point is not the product or output of note-taking, but to think more effectively — creating a mental place for your thinking."
Jorge ArangoExploding the Notebook: How to Unlock the Power of Linked Notes (2nd of 3 seminars)
April 19, 2024
"Recruiting kids really means recruiting adults as their proxies and gatekeepers."
Mila Kuznetsova Lucy DentonHow Lessons Learned from Our Youngest Users Can Help Us Evolve our Practices
March 9, 2022
"Success is about not sacrificing quality, not about mere integration."
Sol MeszHands or Brains? How to Hire for Strategy, Strategically
January 8, 2024
"Customer experience cannot truly be good if some are left out or excluded, either intentionally or unintentionally."
Aaron Stienstra Lashanda HodgeLeveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government
December 8, 2021
"One-on-ones aren’t just reflective of a point in time but are a journey you go on together."
Daniel OrbachZero to One: Co-Creating Operating Models with your Team
September 23, 2024
"Thoughts cause feelings, and feelings motivate actions. Changing thoughts changes everything."
Megan KiersteadYou Are a Badass at UX: Overcoming Imposter Syndrome
March 10, 2021
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can large enterprises design pilot programs that effectively test new research tools without excessive delays?
How does Steve Krug characterize the current AI hype around AGI and its realistic timeline?
How can AI agents maintain context and prevent delivering misleading answers when searching research data?