Summary
In Australia, the public sector is marred by a legacy of efficiency-driven systems that put some of Australia’s most vulnerable at risk. The outcomes of recent Royal Commissions triggered by these failures suggest that the public sector is moving into a new era. Project proposals now require ethnographic research and meaningful collaboration with people who have lived experience of systems failure. We will share our trajectory as a ten-year-old design organization advocating for and driving these practices, recent project case studies about mental health reform and co-production, and a series of provocations about the path we see ahead.
Key Insights
-
•
Australia’s public sector was largely undesigned and paternalistic before 2012, treating design mainly as outsourced web development.
-
•
Studio Thick, launched by Damon Young and Adam Morris in 2012, introduced ethical design focusing on people, planet, and organizations, blending service design with product development.
-
•
Royal commissions into system failures, like family violence and mental health, exposed the inadequacies of traditional approaches and spurred design adoption in public policy.
-
•
Australia’s digital transformation efforts started around 2015 but had poor user experience and trust due to delayed integration of UX and service design.
-
•
By 2018-2019, Australian civic design practices shifted from bifurcated service/product roles to multidisciplinary, impact-focused autonomous teams.
-
•
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital service delivery and innovation, intensifying the public sector’s need for mature design capabilities.
-
•
Mental health reform in Victoria involves a Royal Commission with 65 recommendations, roughly one-third emphasizing co-design with people having lived experience.
-
•
Building organizational co-design capability requires guidelines around partnership, recruitment, safety milestones, and shifting bureaucratic power dynamics.
-
•
Blended teams combining designers and people with lived experience create challenges in mentoring, power sharing, and shifting roles beyond classic design skills.
-
•
Consultants are evolving into facilitators of systemic change, responsible for holding complex, multi-stakeholder projects together while fostering capacity building.
Notable Quotes
"Sovereignty was never ceded."
"Design for the government was something you do to outsource web development, not for serious problems."
"Studio Thick’s name refers to thick value — qualitative research with more depth than simple messages."
"The system had catastrophically failed to live up to expert expectations and was underprepared for future challenges."
"Nearly a third of the 65 mental health commission recommendations call for co-design, which is pretty exciting."
"Designers need to switch hats when working with people who aren’t trained designers — mentoring is essential."
"Power sharing requires behavior change, reflection, and descending about expertise."
"Producers create a care plan for every project — they’re far more than project managers."
"Co-planning means building trust and relationships before planning the project itself as a blended team."
"How do we become facilitators who can encourage and model true power sharing? That’s the big question."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"I felt on edge and physically depleted after our interactions."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"Iterative engagement models mean we test, learn, and adapt rather than seeking a perfect solution from the start."
Aaron Stienstra Lashanda HodgeLeveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government
December 8, 2021
"Trying something new can feel very daunting, especially if you rarely interact with people who use assistive technology."
Kavana RameshMeaningful inclusion: Practicing accessibility research with confidence
September 24, 2024
"If we aren’t crafting experiences that support a thoughtful, ethical confluence of human and machine, humanity is never gonna get to enjoy that meal."
Helen ArmstrongAugment the Human. Interrogate the System.
June 7, 2023
"The SIR model is simple but can be applied beyond viruses—to information spread, finance, and UX adoption."
Scott PlewesWhy Isn't Your UX Approach Going Viral?: A Mathematical Model
March 28, 2023
"The biggest value lies in love, caring, relationships, and beauty—not just what GDP or profit measures."
Christian BasonExpand—Rethinking Design for Public Challenges
September 14, 2022
"An agent is a model using tools in a loop, making plans, reasoning, and calling tools until it’s done."
Peter Van DijckBuilding impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 3: Understand AI architectures: RAG, Agents, Oh My!
July 30, 2025
"Different UX methodologies should coexist and collaborate like an ecology of practices rather than compete."
Soma Ghosh Savina Hawkins Dave Hoffer Rob Thomas Victor UdoewaWhat emerging methods are advancing UX research [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
September 28, 2023
"In the moment, it felt really uncomfortable, and I never thought I’d want to share that with anyone."
Steve Portigal Susan Simon-Daniels Tamara Hale Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Q&A-Discussion
March 30, 2020
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What challenges exist for experienced designers transitioning into academia, especially philosophy?
In what ways does Kenneth see the technology industry retreating from ethical responsibility recently?
How does embedding knowledge capture into mandatory processes improve consistency in government projects?