Co-Designing New Power in Australia's Public Sector
Summary
In Australia, the public sector is marred by a legacy of efficiency-driven systems that put some of Australia’s most vulnerable at risk. The outcomes of recent Royal Commissions triggered by these failures suggest that the public sector is moving into a new era. Project proposals now require ethnographic research and meaningful collaboration with people who have lived experience of systems failure. We will share our trajectory as a ten-year-old design organization advocating for and driving these practices, recent project case studies about mental health reform and co-production, and a series of provocations about the path we see ahead.
Key Insights
-
•
Australia’s public sector was largely undesigned and paternalistic before 2012, treating design mainly as outsourced web development.
-
•
Studio Thick, launched by Damon Young and Adam Morris in 2012, introduced ethical design focusing on people, planet, and organizations, blending service design with product development.
-
•
Royal commissions into system failures, like family violence and mental health, exposed the inadequacies of traditional approaches and spurred design adoption in public policy.
-
•
Australia’s digital transformation efforts started around 2015 but had poor user experience and trust due to delayed integration of UX and service design.
-
•
By 2018-2019, Australian civic design practices shifted from bifurcated service/product roles to multidisciplinary, impact-focused autonomous teams.
-
•
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital service delivery and innovation, intensifying the public sector’s need for mature design capabilities.
-
•
Mental health reform in Victoria involves a Royal Commission with 65 recommendations, roughly one-third emphasizing co-design with people having lived experience.
-
•
Building organizational co-design capability requires guidelines around partnership, recruitment, safety milestones, and shifting bureaucratic power dynamics.
-
•
Blended teams combining designers and people with lived experience create challenges in mentoring, power sharing, and shifting roles beyond classic design skills.
-
•
Consultants are evolving into facilitators of systemic change, responsible for holding complex, multi-stakeholder projects together while fostering capacity building.
Notable Quotes
"Sovereignty was never ceded."
"Design for the government was something you do to outsource web development, not for serious problems."
"Studio Thick’s name refers to thick value — qualitative research with more depth than simple messages."
"The system had catastrophically failed to live up to expert expectations and was underprepared for future challenges."
"Nearly a third of the 65 mental health commission recommendations call for co-design, which is pretty exciting."
"Designers need to switch hats when working with people who aren’t trained designers — mentoring is essential."
"Power sharing requires behavior change, reflection, and descending about expertise."
"Producers create a care plan for every project — they’re far more than project managers."
"Co-planning means building trust and relationships before planning the project itself as a blended team."
"How do we become facilitators who can encourage and model true power sharing? That’s the big question."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Community-rooted wisdom like the Mexican 'guana' practice reduces postpartum depression without traditional research."
Victor UdoewaBeyond Methods and Diversity: The Roots of Inclusion
March 26, 2024
"The Library of Congress web presence was a findability nightmare, like the Winchester Mystery House."
Peter MorvilleThe Architecture of Understanding
May 13, 2015
"This talk is more than anything else, it’s about confidence."
Sam LadnerHow Research Can Drive Strategic Foresight
March 9, 2022
"The feedback culture in our company means there’s transparent discussion if conclusions aren’t clear or agreed upon."
Michelle Bejian Lotia Anne-Marie MorellRolling Out a Repository: How Zapier Centralizes Insights from Across their Organization
March 28, 2023
"Choosing the right hill to die on is so important and so hard; the problems that matter come around again and again."
Leisa ReicheltOpening Keynote: Operating in Context
November 7, 2018
"What if I said that this was actually the assignment: to write an essay using AI, helping students become familiar with translating their policy intent through AI?"
Sarah GallimoreInspire Progress with Artifacts from the Future
November 18, 2022
"Our product simply sucks everything out of the open AI system and processes it with a knowledge graph based on ISO standards."
Joerg Beringer Thomas GeisScaling User Research with AI: Continuous Discovery of User Needs in Minutes
September 10, 2025
"Centralized design teams tend to be brought in after decisions are made, turning design into an us versus them relationship."
Peter MerholzCustomer-Centered Design Organizations
June 8, 2017
"VPs want to know what you really think. They want to see your insights distilled into a clear position of what needs to be done next."
Dalia El-ShimySo You've Got a Seat at the Table. Now What?
March 31, 2020
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What task scope limitations should be considered when working with AI for code generation or design assistance?
Why isn't slowing down or adding more checkpoints the effective fix to the challenges introduced by AI tools?
How should a design system be used or adapted when working with AI-assisted design tooling?