This video is featured in the Designing with AI 2025 playlist.
Summary
The Challenge Users engaging with the AI shopping assistant often felt constrained by limited options, excessive follow-up questions, and a lack of personalization. These shortcomings led to user fatigue, misunderstandings, and a subpar shopping experience. Insights from user research (UXR) and transcripts revealed that users wanted more intuitive, human-like interactions that catered to their unique needs. The Solution A robust, adaptable framework was designed to transform AI conversations into sales-like consultations. By breaking user queries into three core components—use-case, constraints, and preferences—the framework enabled the bot to understand intent and deliver relevant, personalized results. Key enhancements included: Allowing users to skip questions and navigate freely. Providing contextual help for technical queries. Transitioning to open-ended interactions after gathering essential details to prevent over-questioning. Displaying diverse and curated results aligned with user preferences.
Key Insights
-
•
Traditional conversational AI severely limits visual bandwidth compared to traditional e-commerce interfaces, hindering effective product exploration.
-
•
The catalog exploration paradox highlights the tension between rich visual browsing and conversational limitations in AI assistants.
-
•
The expectation gap occurs when AI fails to understand cultural or contextual nuances, eroding user trust and satisfaction.
-
•
User queries vary widely in specificity; treating all queries the same is a missed opportunity in AI design.
-
•
Structuring user queries into use case, constraints, and preferences enables AI to perform intelligent reasoning like a skilled salesperson.
-
•
Carefully crafted prompt design, rather than large-scale fine tuning, can effectively guide LLM reasoning for better conversational AI.
-
•
Adaptive questioning avoids unnecessary or repetitive queries, improving user experience and reducing frustration.
-
•
Designing conversational AI as reasoning systems rather than linear scripted flows fundamentally improves interaction quality.
-
•
A multidisciplinary team combining design, data, and engineering perspectives was crucial to solving this AI conversation challenge.
-
•
Shifting from seeing AI as a task execution tool to a trusted, empathetic guide changes user perception and engagement positively.
Notable Quotes
"We are designing how the assistant is trying to reason, moving from scripting responses to orchestrating the AI's cognitive process."
"It's not just about fixing the chatbot, it's about bridging the gap between user expectations and actual experiences."
"LLMs don't just match keywords or labels. They infer meaning, extract subtle nuances, and understand intent behind words."
"The catalog exploration paradox shows how current conversational AI restricts browsing and comparison, creating uncertainty."
"Users frequently felt overwhelmed and misunderstood; this was a significant barrier to a positive shopping experience."
"What if we actively taught the model how to break down and analyze queries like a skilled salesperson would?"
"The AI assistant starts with reasoning and not results, engaging users in intelligent conversation to understand needs."
"Don't design for a response, design for reasoning. Teach AI to think critically, analyze information, and arrive at logical conclusions."
"The assistant asks open-ended questions that focus on what truly matters: performance, budget, and preferences."
"We saw a 2.5 times increase in active monthly users and a 1.5 times increase in purchases attributed to the AI assistant."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Nearly 45% of seniors 65 and older don’t have wired internet at home, so don’t rely solely on online research."
Amanda Kaleta-Kott Lea Martin, PhDThe Joys and Dilemmas of Conducting UX Research with Older Adults
March 11, 2022
"I have a tagline my team is tired of hearing: about 50% of work is getting it done and 50% is getting it used."
Nalini P. KotamrajuTwo Jobs in One: Being a “Leader who is a Researcher” and a “Researcher who is a Leader"
March 10, 2021
"We’re showing people how to collaborate like crazy and how to fail gracefully."
Phil GilbertA Consistent Culture of Design
May 14, 2015
"Governance needs to become a self-correcting, flexible, and adaptable mechanism rather than centralized enforcement."
Jeff SussnaWhat DesignOps Can Learn From DevOps
November 6, 2017
"Practices are the guardrails that empower individuals to be creative problem solvers and innovators."
Michelle MorrisonPractice What You Preach
January 8, 2024
"Browsers are considered absolutely critical to business given organizations' reliance on web apps and software that's easy to update."
Sharon BautistaTime to Make the Donuts: How User Research Helped Bridge Disparate Teams
January 8, 2024
"Our team does not actually build the components consumed by product teams. Implementation teams report to their respective engineering and product orgs."
PJ Buddhari Nate BaldwinMeet Spectrum, Adobe’s Design System
June 9, 2021
"Workshop content is equivalent to a one-day in-person event spread over 10 virtual hours with coaching and support."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Victor Udoewa Jennifer StricklandEverything You Need to Know about the Civic Design 2022 Call for Presentations
May 17, 2022
"It was not some benevolent church group or a member of a Town Council that carved out these curb Cuts. They were due to deliberate actions and painstaking labor of members in the community."
Sha HwangThe First Fifty Years of Civic Design
November 16, 2022
