This video is featured in the Designing with AI 2025 playlist.
Summary
The Challenge Users engaging with the AI shopping assistant often felt constrained by limited options, excessive follow-up questions, and a lack of personalization. These shortcomings led to user fatigue, misunderstandings, and a subpar shopping experience. Insights from user research (UXR) and transcripts revealed that users wanted more intuitive, human-like interactions that catered to their unique needs. The Solution A robust, adaptable framework was designed to transform AI conversations into sales-like consultations. By breaking user queries into three core components—use-case, constraints, and preferences—the framework enabled the bot to understand intent and deliver relevant, personalized results. Key enhancements included: Allowing users to skip questions and navigate freely. Providing contextual help for technical queries. Transitioning to open-ended interactions after gathering essential details to prevent over-questioning. Displaying diverse and curated results aligned with user preferences.
Key Insights
-
•
Traditional conversational AI severely limits visual bandwidth compared to traditional e-commerce interfaces, hindering effective product exploration.
-
•
The catalog exploration paradox highlights the tension between rich visual browsing and conversational limitations in AI assistants.
-
•
The expectation gap occurs when AI fails to understand cultural or contextual nuances, eroding user trust and satisfaction.
-
•
User queries vary widely in specificity; treating all queries the same is a missed opportunity in AI design.
-
•
Structuring user queries into use case, constraints, and preferences enables AI to perform intelligent reasoning like a skilled salesperson.
-
•
Carefully crafted prompt design, rather than large-scale fine tuning, can effectively guide LLM reasoning for better conversational AI.
-
•
Adaptive questioning avoids unnecessary or repetitive queries, improving user experience and reducing frustration.
-
•
Designing conversational AI as reasoning systems rather than linear scripted flows fundamentally improves interaction quality.
-
•
A multidisciplinary team combining design, data, and engineering perspectives was crucial to solving this AI conversation challenge.
-
•
Shifting from seeing AI as a task execution tool to a trusted, empathetic guide changes user perception and engagement positively.
Notable Quotes
"We are designing how the assistant is trying to reason, moving from scripting responses to orchestrating the AI's cognitive process."
"It's not just about fixing the chatbot, it's about bridging the gap between user expectations and actual experiences."
"LLMs don't just match keywords or labels. They infer meaning, extract subtle nuances, and understand intent behind words."
"The catalog exploration paradox shows how current conversational AI restricts browsing and comparison, creating uncertainty."
"Users frequently felt overwhelmed and misunderstood; this was a significant barrier to a positive shopping experience."
"What if we actively taught the model how to break down and analyze queries like a skilled salesperson would?"
"The AI assistant starts with reasoning and not results, engaging users in intelligent conversation to understand needs."
"Don't design for a response, design for reasoning. Teach AI to think critically, analyze information, and arrive at logical conclusions."
"The assistant asks open-ended questions that focus on what truly matters: performance, budget, and preferences."
"We saw a 2.5 times increase in active monthly users and a 1.5 times increase in purchases attributed to the AI assistant."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Categories are dangerous but not bad."
Peter MorvilleThe Architecture of Understanding
May 13, 2015
"Nobody wants to be told to do your thing unless it’s clear that it helps their thing. It’s just human nature."
Maria GiudiceBecoming a Changemaker by Leading with Design
March 29, 2023
"Afrofuturism breaks down and distorts the heretical notions of objectivity and disciplines haunted by coloniality."
Florence OkoyeAfroFuturism and UX Research
March 27, 2023
"You don’t know how hard it is until you’re leading a user research session yourself."
Anna AvrekhUser Research, Design, and Product - A Love Story
March 11, 2021
"DWI should stand for damn Warren's infertile machine because it was designed on Warren’s typos to solve Warren’s problem."
Samuel ProulxDesigning for Disability, Innovating for Everyone
March 11, 2025
"In Guatemala City, we tropicalize design methods—doing things à la tortres—to fit our unique languages and cultures."
Justin Entzminger Terrance Smith Tracy M. Colunga Mai-Ling GarciaRisk and Reward: How to Diversify the Field of Civic Innovators and Designers
November 17, 2022
"Consent is ongoing; check in repeatedly during interviews about participants’ comfort and willingness."
Uday Gajendar Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Dr. Dawn Emerick Dawn E. Shedrick, LCSWLeading through the long tail of trauma
July 7, 2022
"We created personas that address who the veteran is, what their goals are, their pain points, and their experiences with the VA."
Megan Nipe Lyndsay BoothHuman-Centered Design for Engagement: Maturing from Newsletterville to Personalized, One-to-One Messaging
December 8, 2021
"Creative collaborations often yield the best results, so don't shy away from being inventive in building your research Ops practice."
Noel LambCultivating Business Partnerships to Grow Research Ops
March 21, 2022
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can combining strategic intent with visual skills improve service design communication?
How prevalent are explicit standards of design quality within design teams compared to engineering standards?
How can program or project managers support design ops activities when no dedicated ops role exists?