This video is featured in the Designing with AI 2025 playlist.
Summary
The Challenge Users engaging with the AI shopping assistant often felt constrained by limited options, excessive follow-up questions, and a lack of personalization. These shortcomings led to user fatigue, misunderstandings, and a subpar shopping experience. Insights from user research (UXR) and transcripts revealed that users wanted more intuitive, human-like interactions that catered to their unique needs. The Solution A robust, adaptable framework was designed to transform AI conversations into sales-like consultations. By breaking user queries into three core components—use-case, constraints, and preferences—the framework enabled the bot to understand intent and deliver relevant, personalized results. Key enhancements included: Allowing users to skip questions and navigate freely. Providing contextual help for technical queries. Transitioning to open-ended interactions after gathering essential details to prevent over-questioning. Displaying diverse and curated results aligned with user preferences.
Key Insights
-
•
Traditional conversational AI severely limits visual bandwidth compared to traditional e-commerce interfaces, hindering effective product exploration.
-
•
The catalog exploration paradox highlights the tension between rich visual browsing and conversational limitations in AI assistants.
-
•
The expectation gap occurs when AI fails to understand cultural or contextual nuances, eroding user trust and satisfaction.
-
•
User queries vary widely in specificity; treating all queries the same is a missed opportunity in AI design.
-
•
Structuring user queries into use case, constraints, and preferences enables AI to perform intelligent reasoning like a skilled salesperson.
-
•
Carefully crafted prompt design, rather than large-scale fine tuning, can effectively guide LLM reasoning for better conversational AI.
-
•
Adaptive questioning avoids unnecessary or repetitive queries, improving user experience and reducing frustration.
-
•
Designing conversational AI as reasoning systems rather than linear scripted flows fundamentally improves interaction quality.
-
•
A multidisciplinary team combining design, data, and engineering perspectives was crucial to solving this AI conversation challenge.
-
•
Shifting from seeing AI as a task execution tool to a trusted, empathetic guide changes user perception and engagement positively.
Notable Quotes
"We are designing how the assistant is trying to reason, moving from scripting responses to orchestrating the AI's cognitive process."
"It's not just about fixing the chatbot, it's about bridging the gap between user expectations and actual experiences."
"LLMs don't just match keywords or labels. They infer meaning, extract subtle nuances, and understand intent behind words."
"The catalog exploration paradox shows how current conversational AI restricts browsing and comparison, creating uncertainty."
"Users frequently felt overwhelmed and misunderstood; this was a significant barrier to a positive shopping experience."
"What if we actively taught the model how to break down and analyze queries like a skilled salesperson would?"
"The AI assistant starts with reasoning and not results, engaging users in intelligent conversation to understand needs."
"Don't design for a response, design for reasoning. Teach AI to think critically, analyze information, and arrive at logical conclusions."
"The assistant asks open-ended questions that focus on what truly matters: performance, budget, and preferences."
"We saw a 2.5 times increase in active monthly users and a 1.5 times increase in purchases attributed to the AI assistant."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Each time that goat sees an accessibility issue, he says Billie T get it. Accessibility."
Saara Kamppari-MillerTheme Three Intro
October 4, 2023
"Strasberg believed you can’t honestly portray fear or grief without accessing analogous feelings from your own experience."
Daniel GloydDesigning From the Inside Out: How Method Acting Can Inspire Design Research
February 12, 2026
"Transitions will make or break your cross-device multimodal experiences."
Cheryl PlatzDemystifying Multimodal Design: The Design Practice You Didn't Know You're Doing
April 4, 2024
"Right now, there’s a fear of being replaced by AI, and while a lot of that’s overblown, researchers have a legitimate reason to feel uncomfortable."
Llewyn PaineCoexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
March 11, 2025
"The LAUSD stakeholder felt armed with data and designs to articulate future benefits in a language the school board could understand and quantify."
JD BuckleyCommunicating the ROI of UX within a large enterprise and out on the streets
June 14, 2018
"It should be as easy to run research as brushing your teeth."
Ned DwyerRight horses for the right courses – how and when to democratize research
November 20, 2025
"In the enterprise, complexity and chaos are just another Tuesday."
Husani OakleyTheme Two Intro
June 6, 2023
"Systems thinking requires collaborating with diverse stakeholders rather than working in isolation."
Sheryl CababaExpanding your Design Lens with Systems Thinking
March 28, 2023
"It's okay. I just wish it were a little bit jazzier and sexier."
Dan WillisEnterprise Storytelling Sessions
May 13, 2015
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
In what ways can AI support iterative design beyond initial concept generation?
What is the explore-exploit model, and why is this current period considered an 'explore' phase for UX professionals?
In what ways can viewing research as a design material help tailor insights for better organizational adoption?