Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
In his article for Forbes titled Understanding Fake Agile, Steve Denning refers to SAFe as “codified bureaucracy”. Jared Spool says it’s a “fast path to mediocrity”. But the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is currently in use by many enterprise organizations like NASA, Capital One, FedEx, and the Department of Defense. With so many companies attempting to become as agile as Silicon Valley startups, SAFe is being adopted as a way to scale up Agile software development processes, and many UX teams are having to support it, whether they like it or not.
Key Insights
-
•
SAFe scales agile by organizing multiple agile teams into Agile Release Trains aligned on synchronized iteration schedules.
-
•
Lean UX is typically added to SAFe as an afterthought, creating a hybrid decentralized model where a UX Center of Excellence supports multiple teams.
-
•
Due to limited UX resources, embedding a UX person in every agile team is usually impossible; training team members and using design systems help alleviate this.
-
•
Program Increment (PI) Planning is a key SAFe event to visualize dependencies and align teams around shared work and schedules.
-
•
Working UX one or more iterations ahead of development is important to validate hypotheses but risks creating mini-waterfalls with handoffs.
-
•
Story pointing UX work alongside development stories can improve capacity planning and make UX effort visible to the teams.
-
•
Product Owner and Product Manager roles in SAFe can be confusing and sometimes reversed compared to other agile methodologies, causing role conflicts.
-
•
Smaller SAFe implementations (as low as 100-125 people) can still benefit from the framework, especially for managing inter-team dependencies.
-
•
Effective collaboration between UX, requirements analysts, and business analysts is crucial due to different focuses: user experience vs. business process.
-
•
A risk of SAFe is codified bureaucracy that may isolate agile teams from customers, potentially undermining true business agility.
Notable Quotes
"Each Agile Release Train is a long-lived team of agile teams that delivers solutions incrementally within a value stream."
"If something is not ready by the time the train leaves the station, then it catches the next train."
"There aren’t enough lean UX experts to collaborate with every team, so we create a lean UX Center of Excellence for each value stream."
"Our PI planning events are like 600 people strong, including representatives from across our 6,000 person company."
"Story pointing UX work would help us plan capacity and avoid being surprised by last minute discovery work."
"SAFe is very developer-centric and was originally designed for construction—the code production part of software."
"In SAFe, product owner and product manager roles are reversed from what some teams expect, which causes confusion."
"PI Planning really helps visualize dependencies between teams, which was invisible before."
"If the entire firm isn’t operating the same agile script, you won’t get the benefits of scaled agile."
"Steve Denning says SAFe is codified bureaucracy where the customer is almost totally absent."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Consistency means the same interactions always do the same things; buttons are in the same place, and flows don’t change suddenly."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
November 29, 2023
"Check the people on the board and the advisors because that tells you a lot about the company’s true values."
Max Gadney Andrea Petrucci Joshua Stehr Hannah WickesAssessing UX jobs for impact in climate
August 14, 2024
"When I’m inspired in a meeting, I sometimes have a concerned look because I’m deeply focused, not unhappy."
Shipra Kayan Tess DixonHow Tess Dixon Facilitates Team Engagement and Collaboration at Condé Nast Using Miro
October 1, 2021
"The journey metaphor is better than the sprint because transformation doesn’t have a finishing point."
Bob Baxley Sara Asche Anderson Sharon Bautista Frank Duran Jamie Kaspszak Abbey Smalley Sylas SouzaTheme 4: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"There is still so much work to be done: from dealing with climate change, protecting wildlife, rebuilding infrastructure, feeding the world, ending disease."
Janaki KumarInnovate with Purpose
June 14, 2018
"Design at ExxonMobil isn’t just what designers do; it’s about changing the way people think and solve problems through a human-centered lens."
Lona MooreScaling Design Beyond Designers
June 11, 2021
"You don’t have to be a CFO or accountant, most of the time you won’t even touch balance sheets or cash flow statements."
Giff ConstableFinancial fluency for product leaders: AMA with Giff Constable
April 11, 2024
"Today’s problems come from yesterday’s solutions."
Meghan Hellstern Joanne DongThe Next 100 Years of Civic Design: How Might We Better Rise to Meet the Challenges of Today and Tomorrow?
December 10, 2021
"AI is ambiguous at best because we’re fully in the realm of probabilistic rather than deterministic programming."
Sarah BarrettAI in Real Life: Using LLMs to Turbocharge Microsoft Learn
February 13, 2025
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How does embedding knowledge capture into mandatory processes improve consistency in government projects?
How does intrinsic motivation play a critical role in committing to an academic career in ethics despite job market challenges?
What content and features are available in the free versus gold subscription tiers?