Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

SAFe or Sorry?
Wednesday, May 29, 2019 • Enterprise Community
Share the love for this talk
SAFe or Sorry?
Speakers: Jack Moffett
Link:

Summary

In his article for Forbes titled Understanding Fake Agile, Steve Denning refers to SAFe as “codified bureaucracy”. Jared Spool says it’s a “fast path to mediocrity”. But the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is currently in use by many enterprise organizations like NASA, Capital One, FedEx, and the Department of Defense. With so many companies attempting to become as agile as Silicon Valley startups, SAFe is being adopted as a way to scale up Agile software development processes, and many UX teams are having to support it, whether they like it or not.

Key Insights

  • SAFe scales agile by organizing multiple agile teams into Agile Release Trains aligned on synchronized iteration schedules.

  • Lean UX is typically added to SAFe as an afterthought, creating a hybrid decentralized model where a UX Center of Excellence supports multiple teams.

  • Due to limited UX resources, embedding a UX person in every agile team is usually impossible; training team members and using design systems help alleviate this.

  • Program Increment (PI) Planning is a key SAFe event to visualize dependencies and align teams around shared work and schedules.

  • Working UX one or more iterations ahead of development is important to validate hypotheses but risks creating mini-waterfalls with handoffs.

  • Story pointing UX work alongside development stories can improve capacity planning and make UX effort visible to the teams.

  • Product Owner and Product Manager roles in SAFe can be confusing and sometimes reversed compared to other agile methodologies, causing role conflicts.

  • Smaller SAFe implementations (as low as 100-125 people) can still benefit from the framework, especially for managing inter-team dependencies.

  • Effective collaboration between UX, requirements analysts, and business analysts is crucial due to different focuses: user experience vs. business process.

  • A risk of SAFe is codified bureaucracy that may isolate agile teams from customers, potentially undermining true business agility.

Notable Quotes

"Each Agile Release Train is a long-lived team of agile teams that delivers solutions incrementally within a value stream."

"If something is not ready by the time the train leaves the station, then it catches the next train."

"There aren’t enough lean UX experts to collaborate with every team, so we create a lean UX Center of Excellence for each value stream."

"Our PI planning events are like 600 people strong, including representatives from across our 6,000 person company."

"Story pointing UX work would help us plan capacity and avoid being surprised by last minute discovery work."

"SAFe is very developer-centric and was originally designed for construction—the code production part of software."

"In SAFe, product owner and product manager roles are reversed from what some teams expect, which causes confusion."

"PI Planning really helps visualize dependencies between teams, which was invisible before."

"If the entire firm isn’t operating the same agile script, you won’t get the benefits of scaled agile."

"Steve Denning says SAFe is codified bureaucracy where the customer is almost totally absent."

Ask the Rosenbot
John Cutler
The Alignment Trap
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Dianne Que
Real Talk: Proving Value through a Scrappy Playbook
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Billy Carlson
Pro-level UI Tips for Beginners
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Jaskiran Kang
Why Community is Key to Professionalizing Design
2022 • Civic Design Community
Amy Jiménez Márquez
The Atypical UX Manager Path
2020 • Enterprise Community
Sol Mesz
Hands or Brains? How to Hire for Strategy, Strategically
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Patrick Boehler
The service shift: transforming media organizations to create real value through design
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
Bria Alexander
Theme Two Intro
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Elizabeth Sklar
Co-creating research enablement with your tech org: a case study
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Conference
Tony Turner
Capturing Deep Insights
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Bria Alexander
The Big Question about Resilience: A panel discussion
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Kristin Skinner
Theme 2: Introduction and Provocation
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Sam Proulx
Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Kristin Skinner
Five Years of DesignOps
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Rachael Greene
Building a Design Ops Practice that Really Works (Most of the Time)
2025 • DesignOps Community
Kyria Stephens
Power to Heal: Civic Design in the Aftermath of Tragedy
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold

More Videos

Shahrzad Samadzadeh

"Building relationships beyond roles, as people, makes everything else fall into place."

Shahrzad Samadzadeh

What Is My Value? Two Takes and Some Mistakes

January 8, 2024

Brenna Fallon

"Design your processes around learning. Celebrate especially when you fail—you often learn the most then."

Brenna Fallon

Learning Over Outcomes

October 24, 2019

Ruzanna Rozman

"When we pivoted because of business decisions, we felt anxious but kept adapting together."

Ruzanna Rozman

Getting in Flow with Your Team

January 8, 2024

Sheryl Cababa

"Systems thinking requires collaborating with diverse stakeholders rather than working in isolation."

Sheryl Cababa

Expanding your Design Lens with Systems Thinking

March 28, 2023

Melissa Schmidt

"The secret ingredient to making this work and scale has been identifying and empowering track leads."

Melissa Schmidt Adam Menter

How UX Research Hit It Big in Las Vegas

June 4, 2019

Nathan Curtis

"Design systems are an investment in the future; re-architecture today pays dividends in nimbleness tomorrow."

Nathan Curtis Nalini P. Kotamraju Jack Moffett Dawn Ressel

Discussion

June 9, 2016

Jake Burghardt

"Activating insights multiple times can be necessary before teams truly internalize and act on them."

Jake Burghardt

Stop wasting research: Create new value with insight summaries

July 9, 2025

Kate Towsey

"As more software is being built for specific personas, precise participant targeting becomes more important over time."

Kate Towsey Basel Fakhoury Oren Friedman Graham Gardner

Participant Recruitment and Management Tools

March 12, 2026

Bria Alexander

"The final panel will be grounded in your input from this summit — we want to hear from you in the FigJam link."

Bria Alexander

Opening Remarks

September 9, 2022