Rosenverse
SAFe or Sorry?

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

SAFe or Sorry?

Wednesday, May 29, 2019 • Enterprise Community
Share the love for this talk
SAFe or Sorry?
Speakers: Jack Moffett
Link:

Summary

In his article for Forbes titled Understanding Fake Agile, Steve Denning refers to SAFe as “codified bureaucracy”. Jared Spool says it’s a “fast path to mediocrity”. But the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is currently in use by many enterprise organizations like NASA, Capital One, FedEx, and the Department of Defense. With so many companies attempting to become as agile as Silicon Valley startups, SAFe is being adopted as a way to scale up Agile software development processes, and many UX teams are having to support it, whether they like it or not.

Key Insights

  • •

    SAFe scales agile by organizing multiple agile teams into Agile Release Trains aligned on synchronized iteration schedules.

  • •

    Lean UX is typically added to SAFe as an afterthought, creating a hybrid decentralized model where a UX Center of Excellence supports multiple teams.

  • •

    Due to limited UX resources, embedding a UX person in every agile team is usually impossible; training team members and using design systems help alleviate this.

  • •

    Program Increment (PI) Planning is a key SAFe event to visualize dependencies and align teams around shared work and schedules.

  • •

    Working UX one or more iterations ahead of development is important to validate hypotheses but risks creating mini-waterfalls with handoffs.

  • •

    Story pointing UX work alongside development stories can improve capacity planning and make UX effort visible to the teams.

  • •

    Product Owner and Product Manager roles in SAFe can be confusing and sometimes reversed compared to other agile methodologies, causing role conflicts.

  • •

    Smaller SAFe implementations (as low as 100-125 people) can still benefit from the framework, especially for managing inter-team dependencies.

  • •

    Effective collaboration between UX, requirements analysts, and business analysts is crucial due to different focuses: user experience vs. business process.

  • •

    A risk of SAFe is codified bureaucracy that may isolate agile teams from customers, potentially undermining true business agility.

Notable Quotes

"Each Agile Release Train is a long-lived team of agile teams that delivers solutions incrementally within a value stream."

"If something is not ready by the time the train leaves the station, then it catches the next train."

"There aren’t enough lean UX experts to collaborate with every team, so we create a lean UX Center of Excellence for each value stream."

"Our PI planning events are like 600 people strong, including representatives from across our 6,000 person company."

"Story pointing UX work would help us plan capacity and avoid being surprised by last minute discovery work."

"SAFe is very developer-centric and was originally designed for construction—the code production part of software."

"In SAFe, product owner and product manager roles are reversed from what some teams expect, which causes confusion."

"PI Planning really helps visualize dependencies between teams, which was invisible before."

"If the entire firm isn’t operating the same agile script, you won’t get the benefits of scaled agile."

"Steve Denning says SAFe is codified bureaucracy where the customer is almost totally absent."

Ask the Rosenbot
Ned Dwyer
The Intersection of Design and ResearchOps
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Sam Proulx
Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Shivanjali M.
From Fragmented to Fluent: The Linguistic Approach to Research Knowledge
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Robin Beers
Research as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Deanna Washington
Connecting the Ops: Plenary Panel and Closing Circle
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Chris Geison
Theme 1 Intro
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Dane DeSutter
Keeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Jon Fukuda
Storytelling for DesignOps
2023 • DesignOps Community
Josh Clark
Sentient Design: Crafting Intelligent Interfaces with AI
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Jess Greco
Claiming your power: Practical tools for amplifying your unique voice
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Kit Unger
Theme 2: Discussion
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Erin Weigel
UX Lessons from running more than 1,200 A/B Tests
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Steve Portigal
War Stories LIVE! Q&A-Discussion
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Christian Crumlish
The Pygmalion Effect: In Which a Vibe Coding Experiment Becomes a Million Lines…
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Rikki Teeters
Concept to code: Transforming ideas into functional products with Kiro
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Gold
Aditi Ruiz
Pulse Check: Empathy Mapping Your Product Manager, Pt. 2
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold

More Videos

Andrea Gallagher

"Different organizations need different approaches; it’s hard to generalize research tooling needs."

Andrea Gallagher

The Problem Space

May 16, 2019

Davis Neable

"Investing time in people, relationships, and collaboration pays off in stronger teams and better user experiences."

Davis Neable Guy Segal

How to Drive a Design Project When you Don’t Have a Design Team

June 10, 2021

Brian Moss

"We must keep communication channels open and multiple — including anonymous ones — so people feel safe to speak up."

Brian Moss

What Does it Mean to be a Resilient Research Team?

March 9, 2022

Leah Buley

"This networked micro economy in medical marijuana transformed the world once recreational use was legalized."

Leah Buley

Closing Plenary: The Crisis of Digital

March 31, 2020

Max Gadney

"What is your theory of change? How are you actually going to achieve the outcome you’re aiming for?"

Max Gadney Andrea Petrucci Joshua Stehr Hannah Wickes

Assessing UX jobs for impact in climate

August 14, 2024

Rebecca Topps

"If your product isn’t accessible to assistive technology, participants might blame themselves instead of the product."

Rebecca Topps

Planning and conducting remote usability studies for accessibility

September 10, 2020

Bria Alexander

"Managing to outcome, not output, lets people own their way of working and leverages their best strengths."

Bria Alexander Laura Gatewood Corey Long Daniel Orbach Laine Prokay Deanna Smith

The Big Question about Resilience: A panel discussion

September 23, 2024

John Devanney

"There’s quantitative ways of driving value and qualitative aspects, but we have to break it down into what kind of value we’re aiming at."

John Devanney

The Design Management Office

November 6, 2017

Jesse Zolna

"Non-researchers often think you can just jump in and start asking questions, but that can be inefficient or risky."

Jesse Zolna

Inviting the Whole Org to Come See For Yourself

March 30, 2020

Latest Books All books