Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

SAFe or Sorry?
Wednesday, May 29, 2019 • Enterprise Community
Share the love for this talk
SAFe or Sorry?
Speakers: Jack Moffett
Link:

Summary

In his article for Forbes titled Understanding Fake Agile, Steve Denning refers to SAFe as “codified bureaucracy”. Jared Spool says it’s a “fast path to mediocrity”. But the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is currently in use by many enterprise organizations like NASA, Capital One, FedEx, and the Department of Defense. With so many companies attempting to become as agile as Silicon Valley startups, SAFe is being adopted as a way to scale up Agile software development processes, and many UX teams are having to support it, whether they like it or not.

Key Insights

  • SAFe scales agile by organizing multiple agile teams into Agile Release Trains aligned on synchronized iteration schedules.

  • Lean UX is typically added to SAFe as an afterthought, creating a hybrid decentralized model where a UX Center of Excellence supports multiple teams.

  • Due to limited UX resources, embedding a UX person in every agile team is usually impossible; training team members and using design systems help alleviate this.

  • Program Increment (PI) Planning is a key SAFe event to visualize dependencies and align teams around shared work and schedules.

  • Working UX one or more iterations ahead of development is important to validate hypotheses but risks creating mini-waterfalls with handoffs.

  • Story pointing UX work alongside development stories can improve capacity planning and make UX effort visible to the teams.

  • Product Owner and Product Manager roles in SAFe can be confusing and sometimes reversed compared to other agile methodologies, causing role conflicts.

  • Smaller SAFe implementations (as low as 100-125 people) can still benefit from the framework, especially for managing inter-team dependencies.

  • Effective collaboration between UX, requirements analysts, and business analysts is crucial due to different focuses: user experience vs. business process.

  • A risk of SAFe is codified bureaucracy that may isolate agile teams from customers, potentially undermining true business agility.

Notable Quotes

"Each Agile Release Train is a long-lived team of agile teams that delivers solutions incrementally within a value stream."

"If something is not ready by the time the train leaves the station, then it catches the next train."

"There aren’t enough lean UX experts to collaborate with every team, so we create a lean UX Center of Excellence for each value stream."

"Our PI planning events are like 600 people strong, including representatives from across our 6,000 person company."

"Story pointing UX work would help us plan capacity and avoid being surprised by last minute discovery work."

"SAFe is very developer-centric and was originally designed for construction—the code production part of software."

"In SAFe, product owner and product manager roles are reversed from what some teams expect, which causes confusion."

"PI Planning really helps visualize dependencies between teams, which was invisible before."

"If the entire firm isn’t operating the same agile script, you won’t get the benefits of scaled agile."

"Steve Denning says SAFe is codified bureaucracy where the customer is almost totally absent."

Ask the Rosenbot
Stephanie Wade
Building and Sustaining Design in Government
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Laurent Christoph
Scale the impact of DesignOps in 3D: Diligence, Decision, Discipline
2025 • DesignOps Community
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Key Metrics: Comparing Three Letter Acronym Metrics That Include the Word “Key”
2024 • DesignOps Community
John Calhoun
Have we Reached Our Peak? Spotting the Next Mountain For DesignOps to Climb
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Everything You Need to Know about the Civic Design 2022 Call for Presentations
2022 • Civic Design Community
JP Allen
Navigating the UX Tool Landscape
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Kit Unger
Theme 3 Intro
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Cheryl Platz
Merging Improv with Design
2019 • Enterprise Community
Sam Proulx
Accessibility: An Opportunity to Innovate
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Barb Spanton
Doing Work That Matters: A Look Beyond The Idealistic Notion of 'Doing Meaningful Work'
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
World Usability Day Panel Discussion
2022 • DesignOps Community
Kim Fellman Cohen
Measuring the Designer Experience
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
The Bigger Picture: A Panel Discussion
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Patrick Commarford
Design Staffing for Impact
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Rachel Posman
"Ask Me Anything" with Rachel Posman and John Calhoun, Authors of the Upcoming Rosenfeld Book, The Design Conductors
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Abby Covert
Panel: Collaboration Tools
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold

More Videos

Doug Powell

"We are truly in a golden age for our profession."

Doug Powell

Closing Keynote: Design at Scale

November 8, 2018

Mila Kuznetsova

"Kids are not little adults. You can’t just simplify the text and call it for kids."

Mila Kuznetsova Lucy Denton

How Lessons Learned from Our Youngest Users Can Help Us Evolve our Practices

March 9, 2022

Sarah Gallimore

"Signals are something that’s happening at the horizon, percolating at the fringes of society or in a narrow subset of the population."

Sarah Gallimore

Inspire Progress with Artifacts from the Future

November 18, 2022

Lada Gorlenko

"Field usability testing showed stakeholders immediately how much value UX can add by catching issues before deployment."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Alnie Figueroa

"Our goal is to be AI fluent, not necessarily AI experts."

Alnie Figueroa

The Future of Design Operations: Transforming Our Craft

September 10, 2025

Landon Barnes

"Research is not as easy as putting on a shoe and just doing it; it requires careful consideration and alignment with imperatives."

Landon Barnes

Are My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?

March 10, 2022

Emily Eagle

"In public radio, your listener can’t rewind. We have to design for thoughtful user progression."

Emily Eagle

Can't Rewind: Radio and Retail

June 3, 2019

Malini Rao

"No two re-platforming journeys are exactly the same, and there isn't one single formula that works every time."

Malini Rao

Lessons Learned from a 4-year Product Re-platforming Journey

June 9, 2021

Asia Hoe

"Project management was focused on outputs, assuming the correct feature was already defined."

Asia Hoe

Partnering with Product: A Journey from Junior to Senior Design

November 29, 2023