Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

SAFe or Sorry?
Wednesday, May 29, 2019 • Enterprise Community
Share the love for this talk
SAFe or Sorry?
Speakers: Jack Moffett
Link:

Summary

In his article for Forbes titled Understanding Fake Agile, Steve Denning refers to SAFe as “codified bureaucracy”. Jared Spool says it’s a “fast path to mediocrity”. But the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is currently in use by many enterprise organizations like NASA, Capital One, FedEx, and the Department of Defense. With so many companies attempting to become as agile as Silicon Valley startups, SAFe is being adopted as a way to scale up Agile software development processes, and many UX teams are having to support it, whether they like it or not.

Key Insights

  • SAFe scales agile by organizing multiple agile teams into Agile Release Trains aligned on synchronized iteration schedules.

  • Lean UX is typically added to SAFe as an afterthought, creating a hybrid decentralized model where a UX Center of Excellence supports multiple teams.

  • Due to limited UX resources, embedding a UX person in every agile team is usually impossible; training team members and using design systems help alleviate this.

  • Program Increment (PI) Planning is a key SAFe event to visualize dependencies and align teams around shared work and schedules.

  • Working UX one or more iterations ahead of development is important to validate hypotheses but risks creating mini-waterfalls with handoffs.

  • Story pointing UX work alongside development stories can improve capacity planning and make UX effort visible to the teams.

  • Product Owner and Product Manager roles in SAFe can be confusing and sometimes reversed compared to other agile methodologies, causing role conflicts.

  • Smaller SAFe implementations (as low as 100-125 people) can still benefit from the framework, especially for managing inter-team dependencies.

  • Effective collaboration between UX, requirements analysts, and business analysts is crucial due to different focuses: user experience vs. business process.

  • A risk of SAFe is codified bureaucracy that may isolate agile teams from customers, potentially undermining true business agility.

Notable Quotes

"Each Agile Release Train is a long-lived team of agile teams that delivers solutions incrementally within a value stream."

"If something is not ready by the time the train leaves the station, then it catches the next train."

"There aren’t enough lean UX experts to collaborate with every team, so we create a lean UX Center of Excellence for each value stream."

"Our PI planning events are like 600 people strong, including representatives from across our 6,000 person company."

"Story pointing UX work would help us plan capacity and avoid being surprised by last minute discovery work."

"SAFe is very developer-centric and was originally designed for construction—the code production part of software."

"In SAFe, product owner and product manager roles are reversed from what some teams expect, which causes confusion."

"PI Planning really helps visualize dependencies between teams, which was invisible before."

"If the entire firm isn’t operating the same agile script, you won’t get the benefits of scaled agile."

"Steve Denning says SAFe is codified bureaucracy where the customer is almost totally absent."

Ask the Rosenbot
Jules Monza
Use These Words and Count These Things
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Isaac Heyveld
Expand DesignOps Leadership as a Chief of Staff
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Sarah Williams
A Framework for CX Transformation
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Tony Turner
Capturing Deep Insights
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
George Hinchliffe
Delivering Amazing Experiences
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Melissa Tsang
From Insights to Action: Driving Business Values through DesignOps
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Eduardo Ortiz
Theme 3 Intro
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Wendy Johansson
Design at Scale: Behind the Scenes
2021 • Enterprise Community
John Maeda
About Design Organizations
2019 • DesignOps Community
Prabhas Pokharel
Order and Chaos: New Ways of Collaborating on Synthesis and Storytelling
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Aurobinda Pradhan
Introduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Sofia Quintero
The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Samuel Proulx
From Standards to Innovation: Why Inclusive Design Wins
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Jane Reid
Self-care in User Research
2020 • Advancing Research Community
Kit Unger
Theme 1 Intro
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Matt Duignan
HITS, Microsoft's internal human insight system: From research library to living body of knowledge
2019 • Advancing Research Community

More Videos

Nalini Kotamraju

"Research operations is the spine of any successful research and insights group."

Nalini Kotamraju

Research After UX

March 25, 2024

Dean Broadley

"Constraints can channel focus, but being stuck in them limits potential."

Dean Broadley

Not Black Enough to be White

January 8, 2024

Denise Jacobs

"Designers are change agents. This is part of your passion and what gets you up in the morning."

Denise Jacobs Nancy Douyon Renee Reid Lisa Welchman

Interactive Keynote: Social Change by Design

January 8, 2024

Kim Fellman Cohen

"Our first problem statement was too big, so we refined it to something more doable and actionable."

Kim Fellman Cohen

Measuring the Designer Experience

October 23, 2019

George Aye

"The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don’t have any."

George Aye

That Quiet Little Voice: When Design and Ethics Collide

November 16, 2022

Nathan Curtis

"You have to treat the design system like a product that everyone in your organization will use."

Nathan Curtis

Beyond the Toolkit: Spreading a System Across People & Products

June 9, 2016

Greg Petroff

"We focus on delivering high quality but also moving fast—being comfortable negotiating that tension is important."

Greg Petroff

The Compass Mission

March 10, 2021

Chloe Amos-Edkins

"Understanding culture means looking at a spectrum from global trends down to intimate communities."

Chloe Amos-Edkins

A Cultural Approach: Research in the Context of Glocalisation

March 27, 2023

Mackenzie Cockram

"85% of people were leaving after viewing only one page, showing severe bounce issues."

Mackenzie Cockram Sara Branco Cunha Ian Franklin

Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research from Discovery to Live

December 16, 2022