Scaling Empathy, A Case Study in Change Management
Summary
Organizations of all sizes often struggle to reap the full benefits of change, especially in times of transformation, despite huge investments in technology and process. This is often because employees don't understand how their role is changing. It may seem simple to just clarify roles and responsibilities, but as with consumer facing products, people are unique, complex, and motivated by factors that aren't always easy to discover. Additionally, designing for the employee can also mean designing for stakeholder buy-in. This is a story about a real world approach to building practical application of empathy across multiple disciplines and reporting lines, overcoming reservations, navigating politics, with the goal of building a lasting partnership where employee UX design/execution is a team sport and never outsourced.
Key Insights
-
•
Failing to understand internal culture and employee context can cause well-intentioned projects to fail quickly.
-
•
Scaling empathy requires considering not only users but also multiple internal communities and their distinct pressures.
-
•
Strategic value is realized only when empathy for users and employees is aligned and embraced by all organizational levels.
-
•
Siloed mindsets and rigid roadmaps block cross-team empathy and collaboration.
-
•
Creating advocacy networks or action groups helps translate and spread empathy across teams.
-
•
Embedding team members in other teams’ meetings enhances understanding and collaboration.
-
•
Delivering immediate value before demanding adoption of new practices encourages uptake and excitement.
-
•
Leadership competitiveness can be leveraged to encourage broader empathy-based engagement.
-
•
Employees often don’t perceive how new processes affect their roles without peer-to-peer translation of impact.
-
•
Balancing investments in technology and processes with investments in people is critical for project success.
Notable Quotes
"I didn’t understand the people who would be using it, so it was not received well and shut down quickly."
"We over-emphasized technology and process information and forgot the people inside the organization."
"Everyone was just staying in their lane and focused on delivery, not seeing how their project impacted others."
"We had to connect empathy to strategic value so that executives and teams felt the impact on their work."
"We created advocacy networks that allowed directional communication and peer-to-peer sharing of how roles would change."
"We gave away the recipe with no fee for entry – immediate value first, then learning the process."
"People said, ‘I get it’ when a peer explained how their day actually changed—not from top-down communication."
"The pressures in large organizations make it hard for teams to see the value of empathy and cross-team connection."
"If we release new features too early without alignment, it doesn’t make sense to people and causes confusion."
"We have to think beyond projects to the larger ecosystem and understand the ladder of intended outcomes."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"S****y maps are a Trojan horse for sense-making because they’re disarming and inviting."
Joe ElmendorfShitty Maps: A Trojan Horse for Sensemaking
July 9, 2026
"Designers want more time to prototype and really ensure what ships is successful, but we just don’t have enough people or time."
Kevin M. HoffmanTheme 2: Enterprise Team Journey
June 3, 2019
"Only 8% of older adults are using the internet in contrast to 48% of younger adults."
Rittika BasuAge and Interfaces: Equipping Older Adults with Technological Tools
February 23, 2023
"Design helps build capital and seek comfort, which draws in the most powerful."
George AyeThat Quiet Little Voice: When Design and Ethics Collide
November 16, 2022
"Research and design together tell a continuous story that guides what problems we tackle and how we solve them."
Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig BrookesWhat Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?
March 11, 2021
"Highly trained professionals still default to a presumed 'standard' under pressure, revealing how bias persists."
Kaitlin TaskerFast and Fearless Inclusive Research
March 27, 2023
"Strategic positioning means research is a decision-making tool, not just a service to requests."
Steve Portigal Alba Villamil Sam LadnerThe Future of Research: Bridging the Gaps
July 29, 2021
"Researchers and participants cannot tell the same story because they occupy different locations of power."
Bilan HashiThe Tension Between Story Collecting and Story Telling in Research
March 10, 2021
"Anchor yourself in what you know to be right and true."
Jemma AhmedTheme 1 Intro
March 10, 2026
