Rosenverse
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • •

    70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • •

    AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • •

    Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • •

    AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • •

    ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • •

    Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • •

    Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • •

    AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • •

    AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • •

    Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Pippa Lomas
Paving the Path for Neurodiversity in Design
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Clara Kliman-Silver
UX Futures: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Design
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Alexis Lucio
Scaling Accessibility Through Design Systems
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Uday Gajendar
Day 2 Welcome
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Joshua Graves
We Need To Talk: Managing Ludicrous Requests at Work (Part 3 of 3)
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Brad Peters
Short Take #1: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Tony Turner
Capturing Deep Insights
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Jesse James Garrett
Ready, Steady, Go! Making the Shift to What Comes Next
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Francesca Barrientos, PhD
You Need Your Own Definition of Design Maturity
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Paula Bach
Improving Legacy Software: How Much Better Does it Have to Be?
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Theme Three Intro
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Nicole Aleong
What UX research can learn from other research practices [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Trisha Causley
[Demo] Complexity in disguise: Crafting experiences for generative AI features
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Nidhi Singh Rathore
Embracing participation to unlock deeper truths in commercial research
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Sam Proulx
Designing For Screen Readers: Understanding the Mental Models and Techniques of Real Users
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Jen Cardello
Learning Velocity—The Insights Speedometer
2021 • Advancing Research Community

More Videos

Alla Weinberg

"People work longer hours because of the fear of saying no and fearing job loss, not because it's sustainable."

Alla Weinberg

Workers Are Sick of Change: The Cure is Psychological Safety

June 6, 2023

Megan Nipe

"Nearly three quarters of those surviving violent trauma report alcohol use disorders, which can lead to thoughts of suicide."

Megan Nipe Lyndsay Booth

Human-Centered Design for Engagement: Maturing from Newsletterville to Personalized, One-to-One Messaging

December 8, 2021

Lisanne Norman

"I literally would have to jump up in meetings to introduce myself as the director just to be recognized."

Lisanne Norman

Why I Left Research

March 27, 2023

Elana Chapman

"People with disabilities are very appreciative and willing to help us learn because they understand we may not understand their challenges."

Elana Chapman Li Wen Huang Divyen Sanganee Annabel Weiner

Getting started with accessibility research

February 20, 2025

Dave Malouf

"Inclusive design and accessibility need to move to the forefront with much more intentionality in how we work."

Dave Malouf Patrizia Bertini Jon Fukuda

The Past, Present, and Future of DesignOps: a 2-part DesignOps Community Call (Part 2)

April 28, 2022

Nathan Shedroff

"We need to figure out how to assess design projects and designers better because employers need to make choices, but design resists simple scoring."

Nathan Shedroff Hugh Dubberly Thomas J. McLeish

How Will Design be Taught When the Schools Shut Down?

May 8, 2026

Brennan Hartich

"The design ops menu is not a buffet; teams cherry pick what they actually need."

Brennan Hartich

Communicating and Establishing DesignOps as a New Function

November 7, 2018

Shipra Kayan

"Anonymity in feedback is good, but makes follow-up tricky—managers have to use personal relationships to bridge that gap."

Shipra Kayan Tess Dixon

How Tess Dixon Facilitates Team Engagement and Collaboration at Condé Nast Using Miro 

October 1, 2021

Justin Entzminger

"In Guatemala City, we tropicalize design methods—doing things à la tortres—to fit our unique languages and cultures."

Justin Entzminger Terrance Smith Tracy M. Colunga Mai-Ling Garcia

Risk and Reward: How to Diversify the Field of Civic Innovators and Designers

November 17, 2022

Latest Books All books