Rosenverse
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • •

    70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • •

    AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • •

    Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • •

    AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • •

    ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • •

    Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • •

    Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • •

    AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • •

    AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • •

    Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Justin Entzminger
Risk and Reward: How to Diversify the Field of Civic Innovators and Designers
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Jim Kalbach
Jazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Sabrina Mach
How to Design Your Design Operating Model
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Jeff Gothelf
Who does what by how much?
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
Mark Interrante
Collaboration Flows in Product Development
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Erin Weigel
Failure Friday #6: 90% of Everything I Do is Either Broken or Pointless
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Dave Hora
Research in the Face of Complexity: New Sensibility for New Situations
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Joe Elmendorf
Shitty Maps: A Trojan Horse for Sensemaking
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Alicia Mooty
Design Staffing Models
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Roy Opata Olende
How Zapier Uses ‘All Hands Research’ to Increase Exposure to Users
2020 • Advancing Research Community
Llewyn Paine
Coexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Robert Fabricant
A Genuine Conversation about the Future of UX Research
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Luca Rager
Empowering Gaming at Scale: How Xbox Builds Powerful, Automated, and Distributed Design Systems with Sketch
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Sam Proulx
Mobile Accessibility and You
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Amy Paris
Delivering Equity: Government Services for All Ages, Languages, Sexual Orientations, and Gender Identities
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Yulya Besplemennova
[Demo] Stress-testing GenAI in user research synthesis
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold

More Videos

Dan Willis

"UX design is really about producing usable software, not just pretty deliverables."

Dan Willis

Enterprise Storytelling Sessions

June 14, 2018

Bassel Deeb

"Risk doesn’t usually happen out of the blue; there are driving forces you can watch for."

Bassel Deeb Will Osborn

Do More With Less: Equip and Lead Design Orgs Through Adversity

October 2, 2023

Dianne Que

"We rolled out the playbook without our manager’s approval—scrappy AF."

Dianne Que

Real Talk: Proving Value through a Scrappy Playbook

October 23, 2019

Jorge Arango

"The goal is not to take notes; the goal is to think effectively, as Andy Matus says."

Jorge Arango

The Best of Both Worlds: How to Integrate Paper and Digital Notes (1st of 3 seminars)

April 5, 2024

Patrizia Bertini

"No VP or director has direct responsibility at board level. It’s the C-executives who ultimately decide."

Patrizia Bertini

The (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG

September 11, 2025

Ana Ferreira

"We openly talk about burnout and mental health so people feel comfortable reaching out when they need to."

Ana Ferreira

Designing Distributed: Leading Doist’s Fully Remote Design Team in Six Countries

January 8, 2024

Rachael Greene

"UX research is a team sport and our research process is cross-functional and non-negotiable."

Rachael Greene Alison Davis

Building a Design Ops Practice that Really Works (Most of the Time)

October 2, 2025

Jemma Ahmed

"This transformation is a win-win: we demonstrate solid business value and serve people and stories in more ethical and impactful ways."

Jemma Ahmed Megan Blocker Eduardo Ortiz

Redefining the research toolkit: Expanding methodologies for a changing world

March 12, 2025

Emily Williams

"I want to see pictures of your leadership and board. Do you have women, do you have people of color?"

Emily Williams Nora Fiore

When UX Research and Institutional Racism Collide: A Case Study

March 12, 2021