Rosenverse
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • •

    70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • •

    AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • •

    Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • •

    AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • •

    ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • •

    Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • •

    Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • •

    AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • •

    AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • •

    Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Dan Saffer
Tuning the Turing Machines
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Sam Proulx
Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Rob Mitzel
The Tale of Two Companies: Building a Successful UX Practice in a Century-Old Enterprise
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Lisa Welchman
Cleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Rittika Basu
Age and Interfaces: Equipping Older Adults with Technological Tools
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Christopher Geison
Theme 1 Intro
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Nathan Curtis
Discussion
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Kara Kane
Theme One Intro
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Lisa Gironda
Opener: Chief of Staff–An unexpected journey
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Kevin M. Hoffman
Theme 2: Enterprise Team Journey
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Sara Conklin
A UXer’s 12-Month Journey from Climate Concern to Climate Credibility
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Bria Alexander
State of DesignOps Panel
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Shazia Ali
Communication: Innovative techniques for making your voice heard [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Dan Willis
Enterprise Storytelling Sessions
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Kyle Godbey
Non-linear service design for complex adaptive systems
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Malini Rao
Lessons Learned from a 4-year Product Re-platforming Journey
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold

More Videos

Shanti Mathew

"The layer cake framework helps notice where and what kind of power actually resides in systems."

Shanti Mathew Natalie Sims Natalia Radywyl

Civic Design at Scale: Introducing the Public Policy Layer Cake

December 9, 2021

Fredrik Matheson

"If the system is difficult, the users have a big burden upon them. And in some cases, that’s just how it is."

Fredrik Matheson

First-time users, longtime strategies: Why Parkinson’s Law is making you less effective at work – and how to design a fix.

June 8, 2016

Meredith Black

"We will not hire an asshole. Culture trumps even exceptional talent."

Meredith Black

Scaling Design Culture

November 6, 2017

Tess Dixon

"Having questions about team happiness broken into person, team and product helps clear up confusion in large organizations."

Tess Dixon

C'mon Get Happy

September 29, 2021

"You have to be merciless in your prioritization when everything feels urgent."

World Usability Day Panel Discussion

November 10, 2022

Uday Gajendar

"Enterprises are places where one hand doesn’t know what the other hand is doing and sometimes despises it."

Uday Gajendar

The Rise of Meta-Design: A Starter Playbook

May 19, 2022

John Cutler

"If you are a glue person expecting to be indispensable, you are more dispensable than you think. But if you’re a catalyst moving information and translating to action, that’s more valuable now."

John Cutler

The Alignment Trap

November 29, 2023

Ebru Namaldi

"Designers should not be left to figure things out alone as we grow faster."

Ebru Namaldi

Designing the Designer’s Journey: Scaling Teams, Culture, and Growth Through DesignOps

September 11, 2025

Bill Scott

"I started thinking of the UI layer as the experimentation layer."

Bill Scott

Lean Engineering: Engineering for Learning and Experimentation in the Enterprise

May 14, 2015