Rosenverse
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • 70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Nick Cochran
Growing in Enterprise Design through Making Connections
2019 • Enterprise Community
Dr Chloe Sharp
Using Evidence and Collaboration for Setting and Defending Priorities
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Victor Udoewa
Radical Participatory Design: Decolonizing Participatory Design Processes
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Marc Fonteijn
Increase your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Dan Willis
Enterprise Storytelling Sessions
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Steve Baty
Discussion
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Joe Elmendorf
Shitty Maps: A Trojan Horse for Sensemaking
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Sarah Coyle
Design and Analytics with Sarah Coyle
2020 • DesignOps Community
Andy Warr
Under My (Research) Umbrella: The Benefits and Challenges of Building a Unified Insights Function
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Christian Crumlish
AMA with Christian Crumlish, author of Product Management for UX People
2022 • Enterprise Community
Louis Rosenfeld
The Rosenbot and the Rosenverse: An AMA with Lou Rosenfeld
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Sarah Fathallah
Beyond insights: Rethinking the role of researchers as stewards of organizational wisdom
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Dan Hill
Strategic design, slowdown, and the infrastructures of everyday life
2022 • Enterprise Community
Sarah Williams
Verizon_A Framework for CX Transformation
2024 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Sheryl Cababa
Integrating Systems Thinking Into Your Practice as a Designer
2025 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Angelos Arnis

"Design operations facilitates and magnifies the care that designers can provide to a user's experience."

Angelos Arnis

Navigating the Rapid Shifts in Tech's Turbulent Terrain

October 2, 2023

Jorge Arango

"Culture eats strategy for breakfast—integrating cultures is the hardest and most critical part of mergers."

Jorge Arango

Meeting of the Waters: Designing for Successful Inorganic Growth

August 12, 2021

Marc Fonteijn

"Correlation does not equal causation; we're spotting patterns, not proving them."

Marc Fonteijn

First Insights from the 2025 Service Design Salary(+) Report

December 4, 2024

Dalia El-Shimy

"We have been focused for so long on getting that seat that we haven’t realized that a lot of us are actually already there."

Dalia El-Shimy

So You've Got a Seat at the Table. Now What?

March 31, 2020

Feleesha Sterling

"Rapid research is going quickly; you get a lot of information fast, but the analysis isn’t as deep as other methods."

Feleesha Sterling

Building a Rapid Research Program

May 18, 2023

Jose Coronado

"Dual career paths mean you don’t have to become a manager to grow and get visibility and seniority."

Jose Coronado

From Zero to Hero

September 8, 2022

Shan Shen

"Reducing buttons from six to two and including peripheral information facilitated buying and editing while increasing conversion by 10%."

Shan Shen

Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts

November 29, 2023

Rachael Dietkus, LCSW

"There is a synergy between design and social work values that gives trauma-informed design its meaning and purpose."

Rachael Dietkus, LCSW

Trauma-Responsive Design: Reimagining the Future of Design Now

December 10, 2021

Louis Rosenfeld

"You don’t have to be a PhD or expert to work in climate; your design skills are already valuable."

Louis Rosenfeld Matt Jones Olga Khroustaleva Michael Leggett Karol Munoz

Do you want to work on climate? (Climate UX Discussion Series)

November 15, 2023