Rosenverse
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • 70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Sam Proulx
Understanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Kara Kane
Communities of Practice for Civic Design
2022 • Civic Design Community
Kate Towsey
The State of ResearchOps: More Than Just Theory
2019 • DesignOps Community
Peter Merholz
Customer-Centered Design Organizations
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Bethany Brown
Rewiring operations with service design and AI
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
Bria Alexander
OKRs—Helpful or Harmful?
2022 • DesignOps Community
Harry Max
Failure Friday #5: Lessons from a SaaS Design Failure
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Dave Hoffer
UX Job Search AMA #3 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Chris Geison
What is Research Strategy?
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Tala Tayebi
Voice and influence in an age of noise
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Kristen Honey
"Let’s Talk About Data and Crisis”: Public Digital Service Delivery = Open Data + Human Centered Design
2021 • Civic Design Community
Louis Rosenfeld
GenAI for UXers: A Rosenbot Demo and Discussion
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Alnie Figueroa
The Future of Design Operations: Transforming Our Craft
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Lisa Spitz
Building Trust Through Equitable Research Practices
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
How AI will Change DesignOps Tooling
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Peter Merholz
The 2025 State of UX/Design Organizational Health
2025 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Chloe Amos-Edkins

"Budget and time are the enemies of inclusivity in research."

Chloe Amos-Edkins

A Cultural Approach: Research in the Context of Glocalisation

March 27, 2023

Tricia Wang

"All of our spaces have crumpled and collapsed onto each other — that’s the mess we’re living in right now."

Tricia Wang

Spatial Collapse: Designing for Emergent Culture

January 8, 2024

Milan Guenther

"Public sector is not known for innovation, but frankly, there is a lot of important innovation happening in the public sector and driven by the public sector."

Milan Guenther Benjamin Kumpf

The $212 billion ‘so what?’: unlocking impact in development cooperation

November 20, 2025

Jon Fukuda

"If design, product, and development use different tools, we end up talking past one another."

Jon Fukuda Amy Evans Ignacio Martinez Joe Meersman

The Big Question about Innovation: A Panel Discussion

September 25, 2024

Bria Alexander

"OKRs can sometimes suck the oxygen out of the room if they focus only on bottom-line results, missing process and experience."

Bria Alexander Benson Low Natalya Pemberton Stephanie Goldthorpe

OKRs—Helpful or Harmful?

January 20, 2022

John Taschek

"Analysts are paid to call your babies ugly; but many companies hide those reports—I'm pushing all of them up to leadership."

John Taschek

Making People the X-Factor in the Enterprise

June 15, 2018

Dan Willis

"Are we bold enough to ditch the user interface in favor of a better experience, a transparent one?"

Dan Willis

Enterprise Storytelling Sessions

May 13, 2015

Tracy McGoldrick

"It’s like sending around the Rolls Royce with the champagne bottle – a white glove, concierge service for recruiting partners."

Tracy McGoldrick

IBM User Experience Program—The What, Why and How

October 15, 2021

Alana Washington

"John Calhoun is going to talk to us about reaching our peak and figuring out if we’ve reached our peak and how to find the next one."

Alana Washington

Theme 3 Intro

October 1, 2021