Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • 70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Kara Kane
Theme One Intro
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Uday Gajendar
10 Years of Enterprise UX: Reflecting on the community and the practice
2025 • Enterprise Community
Meghan Hellstern
The Next 100 Years of Civic Design: How Might We Better Rise to Meet the Challenges of Today and Tomorrow?
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Caroline Jarrett
Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Sharon Banh
Reimagining research: What does the field need to grow? [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Cara Maritz
The Art of Extrapolation
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Jon Fukuda
The Big Question about Innovation: A Panel Discussion
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Aleksandra Korczynska
Survey Tools
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Conference
Jemma Ahmed
Redefining the research toolkit: Expanding methodologies for a changing world
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Jacqui Frey
Panel Discussion: Integrating DesignOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Dalia El-Shimy
So You've Got a Seat at the Table. Now What?
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Satyam Kantamneni
Do You Have an Experience Vision?
2023 • Enterprise Community
Jonathan Fairman
Integrating generative AI into enterprise products: A case study from dscout
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Aurobinda Pradhan
Introduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Erika Flowers
AI-Readiness: Preparing NASA for a Data-Driven, Agile Future
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Shawna Hein
Create a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold

More Videos

Emily Danielson

"FEMA is not going to stand up a UX department; it’s our responsibility to witness and find ways to help."

Emily Danielson

“I mean, I can lift a shovel”: Design Skills in Disaster Response

June 9, 2022

Anna Avrekh

"Bad data in, bad data out — making sure research participants are diverse by race, gender, tenure, and location is crucial for inclusive products."

Anna Avrekh Amy Jiménez Márquez Morgan C. Ramsey Catarina Tsang

Diversity In and For Design: Building Conscious Diversity in Design and Research

June 9, 2021

Sam Proulx

"Screen reader users need semantic structure that graphical prototypes typically don’t have, like labeled headings, controls, tables, and landmarks."

Sam Proulx

Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You

October 1, 2021

Louis Rosenfeld

"Every job really is a climate job—there are ways to bring climate focus into any role."

Louis Rosenfeld Matt Jones Olga Khroustaleva Michael Leggett Karol Munoz

Do you want to work on climate? (Climate UX Discussion Series)

November 15, 2023

Dana Bishop

"Attitudinal data alone doesn’t tell us the why behind customer feelings or behaviors, leading to missed improvement opportunities."

Dana Bishop

2022: The Year UX Demonstrates its Business Impact

March 11, 2022

Laura Smith

"We shifted from building each application type individually to creating a platform that planners can use to build their own."

Laura Smith Tom Gayler

Embedding Service Design and Agile Practice within UK Planning Teams to Create Services that Last

December 3, 2024

Robin Beers

"A living systems lens urges us to see wholes, holes, and interdependent relationships in organizations."

Robin Beers

Navigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change

March 13, 2025

Frances Yllana

"Design ops helps our designers and researchers spend most of their time doing their craft while thriving in complex organizations."

Frances Yllana Kaaren Hanson Husani Oakley Dan Olsen

DesignOps Exposed: What do our peers really think of us?

September 11, 2025

Ned Gartside

"There are risks that sustainability tools become gatekeepers or quasi-standards themselves, which we must avoid."

Ned Gartside Mike Gifford Zoe Lopez-Latorre Tzviya Siegman

Navigating accessibility and climate

April 17, 2024