Rosenverse
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • •

    70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • •

    AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • •

    Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • •

    AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • •

    ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • •

    Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • •

    Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • •

    AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • •

    AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • •

    Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Llewyn Paine
Coexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
April Reagan
Look, Think, Act: The Futures-Smart Design Organization
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Steve Portigal
War Stories LIVE! Q&A-Discussion
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Andrea Gallagher
The Problem Space
2019 • Advancing Research Community
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks Day 2
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Bria Alexander
Theme Two Intro
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Dave Hoffer
UX Job Search AMA #2 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Sam Proulx
Accessibility: An Opportunity to Innovate
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Beth Chappell
Leading through ambiguity: Supporting a design team relearning their craft
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Gold
Meredith Black
Building Community and Common Trends to Look for in 2021
2020 • DesignOps Community
Frances Yllana
Theme 2 Intro
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Joseph Williams
Unlocking impact and influence through inclusive hiring in research
2021 • Advancing Research Community
Erin Weigel
Testing and Experimentation Tools
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Yasmine Khan
Checking Bias and Listening to Financially Vulnerable Americans
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Joerg Beringer
Scaling User Research with AI: Continuous Discovery of User Needs in Minutes
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Juhan Sonin
Design Now! The Agenda for Action
2025 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Roberta Dombrowski

"Storytelling isn’t just for qualitative research; it’s also powerful for framing quantitative data to drive decisions."

Roberta Dombrowski Sam Duong Woloszynski

Making Research a Team Sport

March 11, 2022

Laura Klein

"Please don’t chop off that engine until the new one is built because you are not the only one on this plane."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

JD Buckley

"Sometimes you have to give permission to yourself and your team to try something different."

JD Buckley Margot Dear Jim Kalbach Janaki Kumar

COMMUNICATE: Discussion

June 14, 2018

Jen van der Meer

"In Indigenous outcomes, payments are released only when medical and community metrics are met and validated."

Jen van der Meer

Service design performs value

November 19, 2025

Louis Rosenfeld

"Give a s**t about your topic. If you’re not trying to change something, why are you on stage?"

Louis Rosenfeld Jemma Ahmed Christian Crumlish Uday Gajendar Chris Geison

Coffee with Lou #3: What Makes for a Successful UX Conference Presentation?

May 2, 2024

Jacqui Frey

"Leadership is not about having all the answers, it’s about empowering others to own the strategy."

Jacqui Frey

Flow and Superfluidity for Design Orgs

November 7, 2018

Paula Bach

"In the small enterprise user base scenario, you can get down and dirty to know exactly how people use the software and how habit changes will affect them."

Paula Bach

Improving Legacy Software: How Much Better Does it Have to Be?

March 11, 2022

Heidi Trost

"Alert fatigue is real; users can't be burdened with constant security decisions or they'll ignore them."

Heidi Trost

When AI Becomes the User’s Point Person—and Point of Failure

August 7, 2025

Andy Warr

"A research review can increase awareness, improve quality, maintain high standards, provide learning, and promote creativity."

Andy Warr

Under My (Research) Umbrella: The Benefits and Challenges of Building a Unified Insights Function

March 25, 2024