Rosenverse
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • 70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Dan Ward
Failure Friday #1 with Dan Ward
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Adam Thomas
Survival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Joshua Noble
Casual Inference
2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Kathleen Asjes
Research Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Frances Yllana
DesignOps Exposed: What do our peers really think of us?
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Mujtaba Hameed
The new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Snehal Pendharkar
Conducting pre-research with AI agent personas: Pressure-testing concepts for expert workflows
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Gold
Michele Wong
Helping Them Help Us
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Jim Kalbach
Peace is waged with sticky notes: Mapping Real-World Experiences
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Jose Coronado
People First - Design at JP Morgan
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Ivana Ng
Level Up Your Program with ProductOps
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Tim Frick
The journey of building a sustainable design practice
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Samuel Proulx
Designing for Disability, Innovating for Everyone
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Anna Poznyakov
Get The Most Out Of Stakeholder Collaboration—and Maximize Your Research Impact
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Kate Towsey
The State of ResearchOps: More Than Just Theory
2019 • DesignOps Community
Kristen Guth, Ph.D.
Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold

More Videos

Rusha Sopariwala

"Show and tells are not critiques, they’re chances to share progress and practice presentation without pressure."

Rusha Sopariwala

Remote, Together: Craft and Collaboration Across Disciplines, Borders, Time Zones, and a Design Org of 170+

June 9, 2022

Erin Hauber

"Maybe the ambiguity and frequent changes in SAFe could actually be an opportunity, not just a headache."

Erin Hauber

Design is Not the Frosting on the Scaled Agile Layer Cake

October 24, 2019

Vicky Teinaki

"At best, user experience and product management work together in a healthy tension."

Vicky Teinaki Michele Marut Tim Parmee

Short Take #3: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers

December 6, 2022

Lada Gorlenko

"From fast-paced tech worlds, you will appreciate the patience and perseverance it takes to move an old champion."

Lada Gorlenko

Theme 1: Intro

January 8, 2024

Harry Max

"If we could do everything that was important, we would just do it."

Harry Max

Priority Zero: Some Things are More Equal than Others

June 9, 2016

Meredith Black

"I became the Whisperer of the group because I could translate what the business needs were and what the design needs were."

Meredith Black Elyse Hornbacher

Building Community and Common Trends to Look for in 2021

December 17, 2020

Kate Koch

"Defining anti-patterns helps us quickly identify and remedy issues like ineffective meetings or misaligned priorities."

Kate Koch Jean-Claire Fitschen

Flex Your Super Powers: When a Design Ops Team Scales to Power CX

September 29, 2021

Sarah Barrett

"Getting from terrible to not terrible is often more challenging than going from good to delightful."

Sarah Barrett

The "How" of Enterprise Information Architecture

June 6, 2023

Husani Oakley

"AI has eaten the world and will continue to eat the world forever."

Husani Oakley

Theme Three Intro

June 6, 2023