Rosenverse
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • •

    70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • •

    AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • •

    Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • •

    AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • •

    ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • •

    Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • •

    Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • •

    AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • •

    AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • •

    Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Marc Rettig
Discussion
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Sarah Brooks
Theme 3 Intro
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Nick Fine
How UX researchers can partner with (and not be replaced by) AI [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Juhan Sonin
Design Now! The Agenda for Action
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Steve Turbek
Designing Interactive Graphics with AI Code Help
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Gina Mendolia
Therapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Dan Saffer
Tuning the Turing Machines
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Tutti Taygerly
Make Space to Lead
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Kathleen Asjes
Research Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Clara Kliman-Silver
UX Futures: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Design
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Alla Weinberg
Workers Are Sick of Change: The Cure is Psychological Safety
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Sean Fitzell
Craft of User Research: Building Out Jobs to be Done Maps
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
John Cutler
Prioritization for designers and product managers (1st of 3 seminars)
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Heidi Trost
When AI Becomes the User’s Point Person—and Point of Failure
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Daniel J. Rosenberg
Digital Medicine Design
2019 • Enterprise Community
Shipra Kayan
How Tess Dixon Facilitates Team Engagement and Collaboration at Condé Nast Using Miro 
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold

More Videos

Kritika Sony

"When scaling up 3D prints, slicer settings have to be adjusted—something AI didn’t help me with."

Kritika Sony

Moving AI offscreen: Exploring failures, constraints, and recovery in physical game design

June 10, 2026

Steve Baty

"The empathy in defending the opposing team’s idea is very, very powerful and helps find a third way in deadlocked conflicts."

Steve Baty Richard Dalton Maria Giudice Harry Max

Discussion

June 9, 2016

Corey Nelson

"Build relationships before you need them. You can’t create them when the house is on fire."

Corey Nelson Amy Santee

Layoffs

November 15, 2022

Roberta Dombrowski

"A story has a beginning that sets the scene, a middle with rising action, and an end with resolution—this structure applies well to sharing insights."

Roberta Dombrowski Sam Duong Woloszynski

Making Research a Team Sport

March 11, 2022

Briana Thomas

"The project charter is our best friend for accountability, impact, and timelines."

Briana Thomas Christina Rodriguez

When Design Ops Comes in H.O.T. : A Tale of a Transformed Design Org

September 30, 2021

Sheryl Cababa

"Personifying the environment as a stakeholder is like Trojan horsing important climate conversations into the design process."

Sheryl Cababa Alexis Oh

Thinking in systems to address climate with Sheryl Cababa

June 12, 2024

Hugh Dubberly

"The average car today has 60 to 100 sensors generating a terrifying amount of data that will increasingly make its way to the cloud."

Hugh Dubberly

Problems with Problems: Reconsidering the Frame of Designing as Problem-Solving

June 19, 2019

Paul Pangaro, PhD

"Conversation is 21st century design; it's how we share values, align intentions, and coordinate action."

Paul Pangaro, PhD

Systems Disciplines: Table Stakes for 21st Century Organizations

June 6, 2023

Saara Kamppari-Miller

"This was the first time the director saw the team doing something together."

Saara Kamppari-Miller

"Prototype" vs "Prototype"--Breaking Down and Rebuilding Our Understanding of What We Do

October 24, 2019