Rosenverse
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research

Gold
Thursday, March 11, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
Speakers: Joel Branch
Link:

Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) has graduated from science fiction to commoditized widget form, readily able to snap into many processes of daily life. Hence, enterprises of all maturity levels are increasingly eager to explore AI’s roles in their innovation, or outright survival strategies. Concurrently, ethical and responsible development and execution of AI-based solutions will increasingly become critical for purposes of safety and fairness. Ensuring that AI proliferates along the right path will require the infusion of multi-faceted research activities along the entire AI lifecycle. We will discuss the challenges and opportunities regarding this topic in this presentation.

Key Insights

  • •

    70% of enterprise AI projects show little to no business impact, and nearly 90% of data science projects fail to reach production.

  • •

    AI bias, particularly intersectional bias in facial recognition, remains a critical unresolved challenge, exemplified by the Gender Shades project.

  • •

    Black-box AI decision-making hinders stakeholder trust and adoption, due to AI’s probabilistic nature and complexity.

  • •

    AI development teams are overly engineer-centric, lacking inclusion of product researchers and ethicists to address societal and user-centered concerns.

  • •

    ML ops, adapted from DevOps, offers governance and accountability frameworks but currently remains engineer-focused.

  • •

    Expanding ML ops to include human-centered researchers can improve AI explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness.

  • •

    Visualization research is essential to analyze and interpret high-dimensional AI data and uncover hidden biases across intersectional subgroups.

  • •

    AI explainability requires moving beyond feature importance towards causal reasoning and natural language explanations accessible to non-technical stakeholders.

  • •

    AI trust is evolving and hinges on AI’s ability to provide convincing, interpretable answers that humans can understand and scrutinize in dialogue form.

  • •

    Humanizing AI is not simply building human-like interfaces but creating governance frameworks that democratize responsible AI development.

Notable Quotes

"AI development is often uninformed and hurried, resulting in deployments that don’t operate well in the real world."

"Humanizing AI means creating governance frameworks that involve a broad array of research competencies for democratizing safe and effective AI."

"Almost 90% of data science projects do not make it into production—they die on the vine."

"Black box decision making is a hallmark problem—information goes in, something comes out, but we have no clue why."

"Bias is fueled by over-engineering without enough participation from non-technical roles that could reduce it."

"The Gender Shades project exposed how facial recognition algorithms had up to a 33% error rate disparity between demographic groups."

"ML ops offers governance, accountability, and a clear stakeholder responsibility framework borrowed from DevOps."

"We want to increase trust and engagement among end users by helping non-technical stakeholders participate in model evaluation."

"Explainability metrics like trustworthiness and understandability are hard, open research problems needing AI-HCI collaboration."

"AI trust will grow when AI can provide back-and-forth justifications like a human would in conversation."

Ask the Rosenbot
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Theme Three Intro
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Leading through the long tail of trauma
2022 • Enterprise Community
Louis Rosenfeld
You’ve got Gold! A Rosenverse demo with Lou Rosenfeld
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Gold
Jules Monza
Use These Words and Count These Things
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Kate Koch
Flex Your Super Powers: When a Design Ops Team Scales to Power CX
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Ha Phan
Running Out of So-Whats
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Aras Bilgen
Who does the math: A designer’s journey in building an AI-based tutoring app
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Caroline Vize
The State of UX: Five Lessons from 2021 to Accelerate Digital Experience in 2022
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Alicia Mooty
Design Staffing Models
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Matteo Gratton
Can Data and Ethics Live Together?
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Tristin Oldani
Learning the Part I Used to Hand Off: How Building the Systems Made Me a Better Designer
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Taylor Jennings
Repository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Ryan Matthew
DesignOps without Boundaries: Building More with What You Have
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Sam Ladner
Methodologies: Beyond the interview [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Liz Ebengo
The Burden on Children: The Cost of Insufficient Post-Conflict Services and Pathways Forward
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Liam Thurston
Why Your Design Team Is Quitting, And How To Fix It
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold

More Videos

Sabrina Mach

"Leading by strategy with common goals and governance enables better alignment than leading by structure."

Sabrina Mach Nina Wainwright

How to Design Your Design Operating Model

September 29, 2021

Leah Buley

"Artifacts like journey maps and personas often disappear into a void where no one looks at them again."

Leah Buley Joe Natoli

Ask Me Anything with Leah Buley and Joe Natoli, co-authors of The User Experience Team of One (2nd edition)

October 8, 2024

Marc Rettig

"We’ve got to get louder. We outnumber the haters, but we’ve got to be louder."

Marc Rettig

The Urge to Migrate

June 4, 2026

Elena Naids

"It pains me to say, one of the tools they were using was MS Paint."

Elena Naids Liza McRuer

The Power of Difficult Conversations: A Case Study on How We Introduced Design Ops in the Federal Government Space

October 2, 2023

Séamus Byrne

"The internal champion is the ideal choreographer who builds trust, invests in onboarding and bridges the agency and the client teams."

Séamus Byrne

Aligning Teams with Choreography

January 8, 2024

JP Allen

"We’re always taking suggestions for new apps to add to the tools map for later iterations."

JP Allen Holly Holden

Navigating the UX Tools Landscape

October 1, 2021

Mitchell Bernstein

"When you get stuck, fall back to the loop: observe, reflect, and make. Get out and talk to users."

Mitchell Bernstein

Organizing Chaos: How IBM is Defining Design Systems with Sketch for an Ever-Changing AI Landscape

September 29, 2021

Corey Nelson

"Taking time to intentionally create a career strategy helps avoid reactive decisions based on fear."

Corey Nelson Amy Santee

Layoffs

November 15, 2022

Aurobinda Pradhan

"The glue that binds strategy, execution, and measurement is missing in rapidly growing design functions."

Aurobinda Pradhan Shashank Deshpande

Introduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts

September 9, 2022