Summary
In this talk, Kelly, Christian, and Chris explore the unique challenges of conducting UX research and generating insights within large enterprise organizations. They highlight the importance of empathy to bridge cultural divides between tribes such as data and design, as Kelly emphasizes starting with understanding others' perspectives. Christian stresses balancing corporate momentum with addressing critical gaps in knowledge, advising targeting insights that align with business needs and decision-makers’ motivations to maximize impact. Chris illuminates organizational politics where relationships can trump the quality of data or methods, underscoring the value of trust and tailored communication in convincing stakeholders. The panelists also discuss tactical challenges like recruiting participants and executing ethnographic studies in enterprise contexts, advocating for pilot projects and building internal research practices. They recognize the early maturity of enterprise UX and foresee increasing adoption but note that success depends on strategic awareness and PR around insights work. Various practical methods such as intercept interviews, microsurveys, and observation of networked workflows are shared. The conversation includes addressing pitfalls like confirmation bias and bad data, emphasizing data integrity and framing research questions effectively. Together, Kelly, Christian, and Chris provide a nuanced view of how to create meaningful, actionable insights and embed them into large organizations to drive customer-centered product success.
Key Insights
-
•
Empathy is foundational to bridging cultural gaps between different organizational 'tribes' such as design and data teams.
-
•
Both data scientists and designers share a deep commitment to creating awesome customer experiences despite differing toolsets.
-
•
Effective insight work balances leveraging existing corporate momentum with uncovering critical blind spots in knowledge.
-
•
Building trust with senior executives is crucial to successfully influencing decisions with user insights.
-
•
Visualization tailored to how an executive interprets data can turn skepticism into acceptance.
-
•
Enterprise UX research often succeeds by breaking down large organizations into smaller, approachable segments.
-
•
Organizational politics and relationships often outweigh the methodological rigor of insight work in influence.
-
•
Pilot studies and evangelists within companies help overcome fear and budget hesitations around ethnographic research.
-
•
Recruiting ‘impossible’ user groups like data scientists requires strategic high-level buy-in and creative outreach.
-
•
Data quality, understanding research questions, and recognizing confirmation bias are vital to trustworthy analysis.
Notable Quotes
"The core of it is really putting yourself in that other person’s shoes—it’s basic but essential empathy."
"Both tribes really believe in doing awesome for customers, that’s our common ground."
"The weakest insight method might win simply because of the relationship to the power structure."
"Trust is built by showing you’re there to help make them succeed, not just push your agenda."
"Visualizing data in a way executives can interpret is key to shifting from I think to I know."
"Enterprise UX is still nascent—businesses worldwide are just beginning to figure out where UX fits."
"When you look at data without training, confirmation bias makes you just find what you already believe."
"Pilot projects with evangelists inside the company make ethnography manageable and successful."
"Breaking enterprise into small segments lets you apply research methods effectively at scale."
"Building an internal research practice is critical for long-term value and integration of insights."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"By observing Jeff's concerns and asking questions, I was able to show empathy and distract myself from getting defensive."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"We have the responsibility to redistribute our power and include those who have a stake in the work we do."
Aaron Stienstra Lashanda HodgeLeveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government
December 8, 2021
"Captions and subtitles were initially designed for people who are deaf or hard of hearing but over 50% of Americans watch content with subtitles."
Kavana RameshMeaningful inclusion: Practicing accessibility research with confidence
September 24, 2024
"AI has no understanding of consequences — humans are the ones to bring that understanding."
Helen ArmstrongAugment the Human. Interrogate the System.
June 7, 2023
"Math by itself can be misleading and full of biases, but combined with humanities research, it can be very powerful."
Scott PlewesWhy Isn't Your UX Approach Going Viral?: A Mathematical Model
March 28, 2023
"Design thinking is really just a set of methodologies; there’s really no thinking in design thinking."
Christian BasonExpand—Rethinking Design for Public Challenges
September 14, 2022
"Think of the context window like an intern's briefing document: would the intern be able to answer the question with this information?"
Peter Van DijckBuilding impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 3: Understand AI architectures: RAG, Agents, Oh My!
July 30, 2025
"Giving ChatGPT custom instructions is like training your alien."
Soma Ghosh Savina Hawkins Dave Hoffer Rob Thomas Victor UdoewaWhat emerging methods are advancing UX research [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
September 28, 2023
"Reliance on foundational basics applies whether you’ve been a researcher for two months or twenty years."
Steve Portigal Susan Simon-Daniels Tamara Hale Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Q&A-Discussion
March 30, 2020
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What does it mean for design ops to shift from managing existing processes to architecting infrastructure and cultural change at scale?
How did economic and geopolitical factors in 2022–23 affect design leadership roles?
How can design ops balance influence without overstepping boundaries in cross-functional teams?