Leading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
Summary
Key Insights
-
•
Doubling a team’s size can drastically reduce process maturity and create new challenges in scaling tools and workflows.
-
•
Failing to thoroughly vet feedback before acting can lead to choosing suboptimal solutions that cause more disruption.
-
•
Piloting changes on a smaller scale helps uncover issues early and builds stakeholder buy-in before full implementation.
-
•
Assessing the urgency of feedback involves understanding who it impacts, if it blocks critical work, and possible temporary workarounds.
-
•
Feedback should be viewed as data, recognizing whether it reflects the majority or a small subset to avoid biased decisions.
-
•
Locking processes from change for 1-2 months creates stability and sustainability, especially when managing multiple teams.
-
•
Documentation of changes, including rationale, approvals, alternative options, and pilot outcomes, prevents repeating past mistakes.
-
•
Engaging trusted colleagues can help mitigate personal bias when assessing feedback.
-
•
Using anecdotal team feedback helps leaders appreciate the human impact of change and the importance of pacing.
-
•
Managing change frequency is a balance that requires gauging team health through surveys and direct human connection.
Notable Quotes
"If you dug deeper into feedback, you'd find ways to address issues without a big change."
"Leading change is like shopping—take time to find the right store before you buy."
"Piloting your ideas before committing helps prevent disruption and saves energy in the long run."
"Processes are never perfect, but thoughtful testing limits disruption for your team."
"We forget a lot of details over time; documentation saves us from repeating mistakes."
"Assessing feedback urgency means understanding if the issue blocks critical work or if there are workarounds."
"Using pilots can get buy-in from stakeholders who might resist broad change initially."
"Anecdotal feedback from team members helps leaders understand the real impact of change."
"More frequent change isn't always better; good communication and team pulse are key."
"Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Researchers can overcome reluctance to include others by training them closely and collaborating on synthesis to maintain data quality."
Dr Chloe SharpUsing Evidence and Collaboration for Setting and Defending Priorities
November 29, 2023
"If you value innovation and design, then you're investing in creativity."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"Fable’s OZ adapts the System Usability Scale to better measure perceived usability for assistive technology users."
Amber KnablEmpowering innovation: The critical role of inclusive product development in the AI era
June 4, 2024
"Feedback isn’t about liking. Helpful feedback needs to be, is this solving your problem or not."
Dorelle RabinowitzThe Magic Word is Trust
June 15, 2018
"Queerness is change. The power to shape that change is within every one of us."
Dan WillisEnterprise Storytelling Sessions
June 3, 2019
"We grew from two designers to 50 in four months, then over 300 in five years in just the ads design org."
Courtney KaplanTaking it to the next level: Career paths in DesignOps
November 8, 2018
"Seeing frustrations next to system data shifted conversations from blame to true standing."
Bethany BrownRewiring operations with service design and AI
November 20, 2025
"Our job as researchers is not making reports or interviewing users; it’s providing actionable, correct insights."
Laura KleinHuman vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
March 11, 2026
"Many of ChatGPT's organizing themes are at the same level as the basic themes, which is confusing and inappropriate."
Weidan LiQualitative synthesis with ChatGPT: Better or worse than human intelligence?
June 4, 2024