Transforming Strategic Research Capacity through Democratization
Summary
Key Insights
-
•
Fidelity had up to 15 designers per user researcher, causing major research capacity challenges.
-
•
Research delivery time averaged 14 days, prompting teams to sometimes skip research entirely.
-
•
85% of Fidelity’s research projects were evaluative usability studies, limiting strategic impact.
-
•
Democratizing research by training designers in a single method—remote, unmoderated usability studies—enabled faster and more distributed research.
-
•
The democratization program combined education with tool access and ongoing researcher support to maintain quality.
-
•
Post-democratization, research delivery time dropped from 14 days to 3 days, saving 11 days on average.
-
•
Empowering designers to conduct research allowed researchers to focus on more strategic projects, increasing strategic research from 15% to 56%.
-
•
Guardrails like research buddies, presentation feedback, and repository checkpoints ensured research validity despite democratization.
-
•
Clear communication and a shared vision among researchers, designers, and product managers were critical for buy-in and success.
-
•
Key pitfalls included running pilots during holidays, overcrowded classes, lack of breaks between cohorts, and underestimating human administrative costs for scaling.
Notable Quotes
"We had one researcher for every 10 designers, sometimes even one for every 15."
"It was taking an average of 14 days from intake to delivery for most of our research projects."
"Some teams were going rogue or skipping research altogether."
"Our program changed trains people to create high quality, unbiased user research."
"Remote, unmoderated usability studies give designers feedback in less than a day."
"After this program, we saw a shift from only 15% strategic research to 56%."
"Designers would often say, I didn’t realize research was this hard or what you go through is traumatic."
"Don’t schedule your pilot during the holidays — our first pilot had one graduate because it went through December."
"By limiting our classes to six or seven students, we could give better quality feedback."
"Democratization is not about researchers losing jobs. It’s about increasing learning velocity and impact."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Taking stakeholders on the journey by involving them in interviews really changed how they saw the product and business strategy."
Dr Chloe SharpUsing Evidence and Collaboration for Setting and Defending Priorities
November 29, 2023
"The biggest myth of all is you can't teach creativity."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"AI should remain a tool, not a standalone solution, in inclusive product development."
Amber KnablEmpowering innovation: The critical role of inclusive product development in the AI era
June 4, 2024
"The key is of course trust, but in my house the magic word is please."
Dorelle RabinowitzThe Magic Word is Trust
June 15, 2018
"Outside of our keyholes lies information we’re completely oblivious to that can come to haunt us."
Dan WillisEnterprise Storytelling Sessions
June 3, 2019
"DPMs can get overwhelmed quickly because they want to say yes to everything; managers must help say no."
Courtney KaplanTaking it to the next level: Career paths in DesignOps
November 8, 2018
"Don’t overlap sprints. Context slips and decisions unravel."
Bethany BrownRewiring operations with service design and AI
November 20, 2025
"AI cannot notice body language, tone, or environmental context during a research session."
Laura KleinHuman vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
March 11, 2026
"ChatGPT’s approach in analogy generation segmented the narrative into unrelated metaphors, which confused the overall story."
Weidan LiQualitative synthesis with ChatGPT: Better or worse than human intelligence?
June 4, 2024
