Rosenverse
Fast and Fearless Inclusive Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Fast and Fearless Inclusive Research

Gold
Monday, March 27, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
Fast and Fearless Inclusive Research
Speakers: Kaitlin Tasker
Link:

Summary

We will be presenting a simple framework or “toolkit” that can be used to align on the “minimum viable participants” for inclusive research when under pressure.

Intentional user research often gets classified into two categories. One aims to recruit users based on specific, constraint, or viability-driven criteria, e.g., who is most likely to be an early adopter, most likely to engage, or most likely to find value. This type of research is often seen as “fast,” “focused,” and “targeted,” but may overlook meaningful nuance. The other focuses on diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), examining historical frameworks, and patterns of exclusion or injustice, and is viewed as “ethical,” “inclusive,” and “deep” but can also be cumbersome for teams under time or resource pressure.

However, fast and inclusive research are not mutually exclusive. Contrary to the popular belief that building DEI principles into user research slows us down or is just a “nice to have,” we propose instead, that it can accelerate insights by efficiently identifying the highest risk use cases and revealing beneficial design for all.

Key Insights

  • •

    Inclusive research is not inherently fast and must be approached with ethical caution and reflection on bias.

  • •

    Default assumptions in design often invisibly disadvantage marginalized groups, such as women or people of color.

  • •

    Highly educated professionals still revert to defaults under pressure, highlighting the persistence of bias.

  • •

    A frame is a cognitive structure that shapes what we see and how we interpret research, and underdeveloped frames lead to bias.

  • •

    Structured self-reflection on positionality, marginalization, and intersectionality is crucial before conducting research.

  • •

    Iterative framing and team reflection help identify which marginalized perspectives are missing and how to include them.

  • •

    Including diverse stakeholders early, especially at problem framing, improves research relevance and ethical representation.

  • •

    Designing for marginalized intersections often yields insights that improve experiences for the entire population.

  • •

    Industry pressure for speed and minimal resources often conflicts with intentional, inclusive research practices.

  • •

    Creating deliberate space for reflection, listening, and shifting power within teams fosters more inclusive outcomes.

Notable Quotes

"The title of the talk is a misnomer: this work isn't actually that fast and shouldn't be done without fear of consequences."

"The town of Carlsgo wasn't consciously disadvantaging women, they were just following a best practice that ignored different experiences."

"Women are 70% more likely to walk or use public transit, combining trips that are much harder with snow than driving a car."

"We design from our own lens and intentions but repeatedly create harmful consequences for marginalized groups."

"Highly trained professionals still default to a presumed 'standard' under pressure, revealing how bias persists."

"A frame is extremely hard to dislodge from our brains once triggered, so we have to build inclusive frames deliberately."

"You want to set a learning tone for your team and give space for emotional reactions and reflection."

"We need to reckon with how the lenses of the research team differ from those of the participants to avoid colonialist extraction."

"Findings from marginalized groups aren’t just relevant to them but often improve the experience for many more people."

"Frames are not static; they are tools for continuous discovery, reflection, and change."

Ask the Rosenbot
Cennydd Bowles
Exit Interview #2: Rediscovering the ethical heart of design
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Peter Van Dijck
Building new AI skills: Creating outsized UX value with evals
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Gold
Mila Kuznetsova
How Lessons Learned from Our Youngest Users Can Help Us Evolve our Practices
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Everything You Need to Know about the Civic Design 2022 Call for Presentations
2022 • Civic Design Community
Dave Malouf
The Past, Present, and Future of DesignOps: a 2-part DesignOps Community Call (Part 1)
2022 • DesignOps Community
Nina Jurcic
The Design System Rollercoaster: From Enabler and Bottleneck to Catalyst for Change
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Sam Proulx
Accessibility: An Opportunity to Innovate
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Abby Covert
Is the shift greater than the sum of its parts?
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Llewyn Paine
[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Tala Tayebi
Voice and influence in an age of noise
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Mike Oren
Improving Democratized Research with CustomGPTs and Gems
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Jacqui Frey
Scale is Social Work
2020 • DesignOps Community
Farid Sabitov
Theme Four Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Sydney Lawson
Anatomy of a Strong User Panel
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
B. Pagels-Minor
Breaking the Tension: The Power of Enabling Your Employees to Show Up Authentically
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold

More Videos

Louis Rosenfeld

"I didn’t understand just how complex everything was both on the stakeholder and technology side."

Louis Rosenfeld Lashanda Hodge Senongo Akpem Chris Hodowanec

Becoming a Civic Designer: Making the Move from Private to Public Sector

November 17, 2022

Robert Fabricant

"Research is no longer impartial; we’re navigating a changing landscape of trust."

Robert Fabricant

Shifting dynamics: The evolving relationship between researchers, participants, and organizational systems

March 11, 2025

Tracy McGoldrick

"Getting internal teams on board is often the biggest challenge, but once they see the value, it lights a fire."

Tracy McGoldrick

IBM User Experience Program—The What, Why and How

October 15, 2021

Erika Kincaid

"Design review is a time to get comfortable feeling vulnerable and stay curious and open. - Kelly"

Erika Kincaid Brenna Heaps Jessica Tsukimura

Connecting the Dots: How to Foster Collaboration and Build a Strong Design Review Culture

June 8, 2022

Erin Weigel

"Power users would right click and open listings in new tabs to keep their place in search results."

Erin Weigel

Real-world lessons to improve your conversion rates

June 26, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"When you change people’s workflows, you are literally changing power dynamics."

Sofia Quintero

Beyond Tools: The Messy Business of Implementing Research Repositories

March 10, 2022

Jennifer Bolduc

"Attrition is real and painful but also an opportunity if we have a deep and broad hiring funnel."

Jennifer Bolduc Diane Gregorio Emily Day

What's involved with getting people back to work?: A panel discussion

July 1, 2021

Dan Willis

"The prototype caught fire because the motor and axle were misaligned — my design didn’t consider the physical realities."

Dan Willis

Enterprise Storytelling Sessions

June 8, 2016

Samuel Proulx

"For those of us who are blind, braille is very costly to make, bulky, and slow to read compared to audio."

Samuel Proulx

Designing for Disability, Innovating for Everyone

March 11, 2025