Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Have fun with statistics?

Thursday, December 12, 2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
Have fun with statistics?
Speakers: Caroline Jarrett and Erin Weigel
Link:

Summary

Let’s face it, many of us feel daunted by statistics. But we also know that colleagues and clients ask whether our research has “statistically significant” results. Erin’s book Design for Impact helps you to test your hypotheses about improving design, and she guides you through deciding on your effect sizes to help you get those statistically significant results. Caroline’s book Surveys That Work talks about “significance in practice” and she’s not all that convinced about whether it’s worth aiming for statistical significance. Watch this lively session where Erin and Caroline compared and contrasted their ideas and approaches - helped by your questions and contributions.

Key Insights

  • Statistical significance often confuses practitioners because it requires mentally flipping hypotheses and disproving nulls, which is cognitively demanding.

  • Effect size is critical to understanding whether a change detected by statistics is meaningful in practice, a concept often neglected in statistics education.

  • Fast progress isn't necessarily good progress; teams benefit from slowing down and using statistics to ensure they're moving in the right direction.

  • Engineers can be reluctant to implement experiments due to the extra coding load, but they respond well when they understand the learning value gained.

  • Survey results (the numerical outcomes) are often confused with the number of respondents required for statistical significance, leading to misunderstandings.

  • Statistical thresholds like 95% confidence can be adjusted depending on project needs; lower confidence levels are sometimes acceptable.

  • A good hypothesis often starts as an intuitive guess, which gets refined over time through repeated testing and data collection.

  • Qualitative and quantitative research should be viewed as complementary tools in a holistic research approach rather than opposed methods.

  • AI tools can help generate first drafts of survey questions, but human-centered pilot testing is essential to avoid errors and misinterpretations.

  • It's common and acceptable to act on results that are significant in practice but not statistically significant, especially when outcomes clearly affect users.

Notable Quotes

"Statistics is hard because you have to flip flop in your head: think of a hypothesis, then a null hypothesis, then try to disprove the null."

"People confuse statistical significance with significance in practice — they want to know if the change is meaningful, not just mathematically significant."

"Fast is not a virtue in and of itself; moving slower and acting with intention ensures you go in the right direction."

"Engineers hate writing more code, so getting them to buy into experiments means showing the value of the learning on the other side."

"You can have an effect size that matters in practice but isn’t statistically significant, like five users failing a key task in usability testing."

"Most science starts with somebody pulling a number out of their ass — it’s okay to start with a gut instinct or guess."

"Statistics is another tool in our toolbox, part of a hierarchy of evidence that includes qualitative and quantitative methods."

"AI can create first drafts of survey questions, but unless you pilot test with real humans, you won’t know if your audience gets it."

"A lot of people think 95% confidence is the only way, but you can adjust confidence levels based on your situation and needs."

"Start with basics like means, minimums, and ranges — statistics rapidly becomes less mysterious and more useful with practice."

Ask the Rosenbot
Cennydd Bowles
Responsible Design in Reality
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Adam Thomas
Survival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Jack Moffett
UX Metrics That Matter and The Future of our Design at Scale Conference: A Community Conversation
2022 • Enterprise Community
Alissa Briggs
How to Coach Enterprise Experimentation
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Alba Villamil
Stereotyped by Design: Pitfalls in Cross-Cultural User Research
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Jose Coronado
From Zero to Hero
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Maria Giudice
Remaking the Making Company: Moving from Product to Experience
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Michelle Chin
The DesignOps Starter Kit
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Samuel Proulx
From Standards to Innovation: Why Inclusive Design Wins
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
Sam Proulx
Understanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Maria Taylor
Knowledge is Power: Managing the Lifeblood of the Design Org
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Jill Fruchter
Inconvenient Insights: The Researcher's Role is to Stay Curious
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Sofia Quintero
Beyond Tools: The Messy Business of Implementing Research Repositories
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Julie Gitlin
Design as an Agent of Digital Transformation at JPMC
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Mac Smith
Measuring Up: Using Product Research for Organizational Impact
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Dolly Parikh
Exit Interview #7: Journey of a Social Entrepreneur
2026 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Maria Giudice

"Design is not a noun. Design is an active verb."

Maria Giudice

Remaking the Making Company: Moving from Product to Experience

June 9, 2016

Christian Crumlish

"If you want to improve the product team’s understanding, frame UX value in terms of their language and goals, not just UX jargon."

Christian Crumlish

AMA with Christian Crumlish, author of Product Management for UX People

March 24, 2022

Rima Campbell

"Quantitative data boils complex situations down to single numbers that are easy to grasp and discuss."

Rima Campbell Amrit S Bhachu

Increase Productivity and Drive Business Impact

September 24, 2024

Sam Proulx

"Accessibility was considered kind of an inspiring hack, an inspirational rarity."

Sam Proulx

To Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility

June 10, 2022

Victor Udoewa

"Design futures are not always in the future; sometimes they reflect constraints of budget, resources, or political will."

Victor Udoewa

Radical Participatory Design: Decolonizing Participatory Design Processes

December 10, 2021

Jon Fukuda

"AI won’t transform all things at once; it’s about piloting and delivering discrete business value first."

Jon Fukuda Amy Evans Ignacio Martinez Joe Meersman

The Big Question about Innovation: A Panel Discussion

September 25, 2024

Rachael Dietkus, LCSW

"There is a synergy between design and social work values that gives trauma-informed design its meaning and purpose."

Rachael Dietkus, LCSW

Trauma-Responsive Design: Reimagining the Future of Design Now

December 10, 2021

Kyria Stephens

"Gunshots were a routine sound growing up. We became numb to it."

Kyria Stephens Marlon Kerner

Power to Heal: Civic Design in the Aftermath of Tragedy

November 17, 2022

Niko Laitinen

"Low-threshold peer designing exponentially develops confidence very quickly."

Niko Laitinen

Adaptable Org Design for Resilient Times

June 10, 2021