Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
Let’s face it, many of us feel daunted by statistics. But we also know that colleagues and clients ask whether our research has “statistically significant” results. Erin’s book Design for Impact helps you to test your hypotheses about improving design, and she guides you through deciding on your effect sizes to help you get those statistically significant results. Caroline’s book Surveys That Work talks about “significance in practice” and she’s not all that convinced about whether it’s worth aiming for statistical significance. Watch this lively session where Erin and Caroline compared and contrasted their ideas and approaches - helped by your questions and contributions.
Key Insights
-
•
Statistical significance often confuses practitioners because it requires mentally flipping hypotheses and disproving nulls, which is cognitively demanding.
-
•
Effect size is critical to understanding whether a change detected by statistics is meaningful in practice, a concept often neglected in statistics education.
-
•
Fast progress isn't necessarily good progress; teams benefit from slowing down and using statistics to ensure they're moving in the right direction.
-
•
Engineers can be reluctant to implement experiments due to the extra coding load, but they respond well when they understand the learning value gained.
-
•
Survey results (the numerical outcomes) are often confused with the number of respondents required for statistical significance, leading to misunderstandings.
-
•
Statistical thresholds like 95% confidence can be adjusted depending on project needs; lower confidence levels are sometimes acceptable.
-
•
A good hypothesis often starts as an intuitive guess, which gets refined over time through repeated testing and data collection.
-
•
Qualitative and quantitative research should be viewed as complementary tools in a holistic research approach rather than opposed methods.
-
•
AI tools can help generate first drafts of survey questions, but human-centered pilot testing is essential to avoid errors and misinterpretations.
-
•
It's common and acceptable to act on results that are significant in practice but not statistically significant, especially when outcomes clearly affect users.
Notable Quotes
"Statistics is hard because you have to flip flop in your head: think of a hypothesis, then a null hypothesis, then try to disprove the null."
"People confuse statistical significance with significance in practice — they want to know if the change is meaningful, not just mathematically significant."
"Fast is not a virtue in and of itself; moving slower and acting with intention ensures you go in the right direction."
"Engineers hate writing more code, so getting them to buy into experiments means showing the value of the learning on the other side."
"You can have an effect size that matters in practice but isn’t statistically significant, like five users failing a key task in usability testing."
"Most science starts with somebody pulling a number out of their ass — it’s okay to start with a gut instinct or guess."
"Statistics is another tool in our toolbox, part of a hierarchy of evidence that includes qualitative and quantitative methods."
"AI can create first drafts of survey questions, but unless you pilot test with real humans, you won’t know if your audience gets it."
"A lot of people think 95% confidence is the only way, but you can adjust confidence levels based on your situation and needs."
"Start with basics like means, minimums, and ranges — statistics rapidly becomes less mysterious and more useful with practice."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
More Videos
"I hadn’t realized that we were both going to need that advice."
Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II
March 30, 2020
"Build relationships before you need them. You can’t create them when the house is on fire."
Corey Nelson Amy SanteeLayoffs
November 15, 2022
"Mixed methods research, combining qualitative and quantitative, gives the fullest understanding of customer experience."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"Self-report is not the end all; people often don’t know why they behave certain ways, especially regarding automatic motivations like deeply ingrained mental models."
Amy BucherHarnessing behavioral science to uncover deeper truths
March 12, 2025
"Momentum in users is like energy in fluid—strong motivation drives fast, decisive movement."
David SternbergUncovering the hidden forces shaping user behavior
July 17, 2025
"Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024
"Provocative prototypes provoke conversation and surface unspoken values."
Jennifer StricklandAdopting a "Design By" Method
December 9, 2021
"We realized we were solving problems of a design practice when our organization had actually scaled to an organizational level."
Rachel Posman John CalhounA Closer Look at Team Ops and Product Ops (Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin)
November 19, 2020
"Service design is 10% connecting the dots and 90% creating the conditions that bring those dots closer together."
Gina MendoliaTherapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
December 3, 2024
