Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Have fun with statistics?

Thursday, December 12, 2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
Have fun with statistics?
Speakers: Caroline Jarrett and Erin Weigel
Link:

Summary

Let’s face it, many of us feel daunted by statistics. But we also know that colleagues and clients ask whether our research has “statistically significant” results. Erin’s book Design for Impact helps you to test your hypotheses about improving design, and she guides you through deciding on your effect sizes to help you get those statistically significant results. Caroline’s book Surveys That Work talks about “significance in practice” and she’s not all that convinced about whether it’s worth aiming for statistical significance. Watch this lively session where Erin and Caroline compared and contrasted their ideas and approaches - helped by your questions and contributions.

Key Insights

  • Statistical significance often confuses practitioners because it requires mentally flipping hypotheses and disproving nulls, which is cognitively demanding.

  • Effect size is critical to understanding whether a change detected by statistics is meaningful in practice, a concept often neglected in statistics education.

  • Fast progress isn't necessarily good progress; teams benefit from slowing down and using statistics to ensure they're moving in the right direction.

  • Engineers can be reluctant to implement experiments due to the extra coding load, but they respond well when they understand the learning value gained.

  • Survey results (the numerical outcomes) are often confused with the number of respondents required for statistical significance, leading to misunderstandings.

  • Statistical thresholds like 95% confidence can be adjusted depending on project needs; lower confidence levels are sometimes acceptable.

  • A good hypothesis often starts as an intuitive guess, which gets refined over time through repeated testing and data collection.

  • Qualitative and quantitative research should be viewed as complementary tools in a holistic research approach rather than opposed methods.

  • AI tools can help generate first drafts of survey questions, but human-centered pilot testing is essential to avoid errors and misinterpretations.

  • It's common and acceptable to act on results that are significant in practice but not statistically significant, especially when outcomes clearly affect users.

Notable Quotes

"Statistics is hard because you have to flip flop in your head: think of a hypothesis, then a null hypothesis, then try to disprove the null."

"People confuse statistical significance with significance in practice — they want to know if the change is meaningful, not just mathematically significant."

"Fast is not a virtue in and of itself; moving slower and acting with intention ensures you go in the right direction."

"Engineers hate writing more code, so getting them to buy into experiments means showing the value of the learning on the other side."

"You can have an effect size that matters in practice but isn’t statistically significant, like five users failing a key task in usability testing."

"Most science starts with somebody pulling a number out of their ass — it’s okay to start with a gut instinct or guess."

"Statistics is another tool in our toolbox, part of a hierarchy of evidence that includes qualitative and quantitative methods."

"AI can create first drafts of survey questions, but unless you pilot test with real humans, you won’t know if your audience gets it."

"A lot of people think 95% confidence is the only way, but you can adjust confidence levels based on your situation and needs."

"Start with basics like means, minimums, and ranges — statistics rapidly becomes less mysterious and more useful with practice."

Ask the Rosenbot
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Meghan Bausone
Systems Thinking and Design Innovation: Working with Leverage Points in Rural Maternal Health Systems
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Joshua Noble
Casual Inference
2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Luca Rager
Empowering Gaming at Scale: How Xbox Builds Powerful, Automated, and Distributed Design Systems with Sketch
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Taylor Jennings
Repository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Cheryl Platz
Demystifying Multimodal Design: The Design Practice You Didn't Know You're Doing
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Lija Hogan
Doing more with more: Lessons from the Front Lines of Democratization
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Charlotte Lee
Theme 1 Intro
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Yulya Besplemennova
[Demo] Stress-testing GenAI in user research synthesis
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Jim Kalbach
Jazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Soma Ghosh
What emerging methods are advancing UX research [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Rebecca Gimenez
Work in Progress: Service Design at Airbnb
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
John Cutler
The Alignment Trap
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Erika Flowers
The Handoff is Dead: Design-Led Engineering with AI Agents
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Laura Weiss
There is No Playbook: Leader as Coach During Challenging Times
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Josina Vink
Navigating the pitfalls of systems thinking in service design
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold

More Videos

Bria Alexander

"It’s about us, the design ops practitioners, and what we need today to be better at our jobs."

Bria Alexander

Theme Two Intro

October 3, 2023

Ariba Jahan

"When the pandemic hit, those in the resilient 'yellow' zone had enough reserve to readjust and come back."

Ariba Jahan

Team Resiliency Through a Pandemic

January 8, 2024

Cornelius Rachieru

"On lower layers, research spaces are limited and focused, while at higher layers, problem spaces are ambiguous and require holistic approaches."

Cornelius Rachieru

Handling Complexity: Framing a Scale of Design

June 9, 2021

Megan Clegg

"Olivia isn’t disabled, she’s just in a situation that makes accessibility critical."

Megan Clegg Michael Haggerty-Villa Alexis Morin

Space for Everyone: Reframing Accessibility Through a Wider Lens

June 10, 2021

Saara Kamppari-Miller

"I call this an anti org chart because it’s organic, messy, and structures emerge rather than imposed."

Saara Kamppari-Miller

Cartography for Design Communities

September 10, 2025

Kara Kane

"Civic design and government design practice have reached many milestones in the past 10 years."

Kara Kane

Theme One Intro

November 16, 2022

Natalia Radywyl

"Sovereignty was never ceded."

Natalia Radywyl

Co-Designing New Power in Australia's Public Sector

November 16, 2022

Nancy Douyon

"The nobility complex is when we in the West unintentionally create solutions without accounting for our own biases."

Nancy Douyon

We'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex

June 15, 2018

Peter Van Dijck

"Eval is the engineering word for evaluation, but also what researchers and UX designers naturally do."

Peter Van Dijck

Building the Rosenbot

June 4, 2024