Summary
For those of us in roles that aim to link experiences, see things end-to-end, or understand systems as ecosystems, the constant currents of change can make it feel like we’re endlessly adapting just to keep up. We long for a stable point of definition and clarity amid all this motion. In this talk, I’ll draw from my experience across various roles and companies to help you recognize and navigate the broader forces shaping our related fields. Using metaphors like oxbows, rivers, and estuaries, and with practical examples, I’ll share tactics for navigating change with intention, helping you stay grounded in the long game while seizing “act now” opportunities.
Key Insights
-
•
Integrative roles such as service design, product management, and UX research face unique boundary-spanning challenges involving complex cognitive and emotional labor.
-
•
Organizational maturity is nonlinear; fast-moving, product-led companies and slower, service-design-mature companies have complementary strengths.
-
•
There is a widespread 'battle of models' as different teams create overlapping sense-making frameworks like journey maps, value streams, and architectural diagrams.
-
•
Trying to force one unified model across an organization is typically ineffective; embracing diverse models and finding commonalities is more productive.
-
•
The river metaphor (water, obstacles, route, markers, safety) is powerful for understanding how to read and navigate organizational change currents.
-
•
Oxbow lakes metaphor warns that pushing hard in one direction can isolate teams or disciplines when larger economic or organizational 'floods' reshape the context.
-
•
Estuaries metaphor highlights the creative potential at boundaries where different disciplines and perspectives mix, but also the sensitivity and fragility of such ecosystems.
-
•
Patient opportunism—choosing when to leverage currents and when to push against them—is critical to long-term success and avoiding burnout in integrative roles.
-
•
Many key decisions impacting customer experience happen in engineering or architecture teams that may not traditionally include service design participation.
-
•
Perceptions of progress can be skewed; although some disciplines feel stagnated, other evolving disciplines offer opportunities for collaboration and innovation.
Notable Quotes
"You have to go from being able to deliver a message in three bullets and then turn around in the next moment and deliver a massive service blueprint or customer journey."
"Maturity is not linear; the tanker company had a lot to learn from the speedboat, and vice versa."
"Everyone is circling around similar topics but in very different ways—there’s a battle of models but more similarities than differences."
"Sometimes leaders focus so much on scanning the river they’re not observing the surroundings—the banks tell you if the river is deep or shallow."
"If you need to cross a dangerous river, you don’t paddle straight into it; you use the opposing force of the river to move forward."
"Trying to force one preeminent model for the company is a recipe for disaster—embrace models and understand why people are using them."
"It is impossible to survive in this industry by pushing against the current all the time; you must put yourself in positions to leverage the current."
"Some of the most important decisions for service design happen on whiteboards among engineers, often without service design representation."
"The estuary is highly resilient but also very sensitive to industrial waste—creative collaboration areas in organizations are similar."
"Patient opportunism means most of the time having the current at your back and only occasionally angling directly against it to avoid burnout."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Even when we bring the data together, we’re still not necessarily synthesizing very well."
Brad Peters Anne MamaghaniShort Take #1: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers
December 6, 2022
"I like to think of myself as a DJ at a party, amplifying the power of design so more people can dance to the future."
Lona MooreScaling Design Beyond Designers
June 11, 2021
"Radically adaptive experiences bend to your current wants and needs, creating unique, unpredictable journeys."
Josh Clark Veronika KindredSentient Design, AI, and the Radically Adaptive Experience (1st of 3 seminars)
January 15, 2025
"If we can’t provide research as a service at scale, we need to make sure the teams are equipped to do it on their own."
Erin May Roberta Dombrowski Laura Oxenfeld Brooke HintonDistributed, Democratized, Decentralized: Finding a Research Model to Support Your Org
March 10, 2022
"When I gave the model my list of interview questions, it actually made for a really bizarre participant experience because the model just went down the line of the different questions."
Tara TresselInvestigating qualitative depth of AI-moderated interviews
March 10, 2026
"Workshops often reveal gaps in documentation, which is a spicy take but true."
Charles Lee Jennie YipBuilding a New Home for the Atlassian Design System
October 22, 2020
"We are not replacing teachers; we are enhancing their ability to teach effectively."
Kristin SkinnerFive Years of DesignOps
September 29, 2021
"User researchers stop at findings and insights, but often do not advocate for a direction."
Megan BlockerGetting to the “So What?”: How Management Consulting Practices Can Transform Your Approach to Research
March 26, 2024
"Systems change happens at the human scale by making structures and humans visible so we can investigate and change them together."
Shanti Mathew Natalie Sims Natalia RadywylCivic Design at Scale: Introducing the Public Policy Layer Cake
December 9, 2021
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Why is human-in-the-loop important in AI-assisted user research according to Survicate's experience?
What privacy and security considerations arise when using AI with participant data in research tools?
Can AI accurately detect participant behavior discrepancies between what is said and what is done?