Oxbows, Rivers, and Estuaries: How to navigate the currents of change (without burning out)
Summary
For those of us in roles that aim to link experiences, see things end-to-end, or understand systems as ecosystems, the constant currents of change can make it feel like we’re endlessly adapting just to keep up. We long for a stable point of definition and clarity amid all this motion. In this talk, I’ll draw from my experience across various roles and companies to help you recognize and navigate the broader forces shaping our related fields. Using metaphors like oxbows, rivers, and estuaries, and with practical examples, I’ll share tactics for navigating change with intention, helping you stay grounded in the long game while seizing “act now” opportunities.
Key Insights
-
•
Integrative roles such as service design, product management, and UX research face unique boundary-spanning challenges involving complex cognitive and emotional labor.
-
•
Organizational maturity is nonlinear; fast-moving, product-led companies and slower, service-design-mature companies have complementary strengths.
-
•
There is a widespread 'battle of models' as different teams create overlapping sense-making frameworks like journey maps, value streams, and architectural diagrams.
-
•
Trying to force one unified model across an organization is typically ineffective; embracing diverse models and finding commonalities is more productive.
-
•
The river metaphor (water, obstacles, route, markers, safety) is powerful for understanding how to read and navigate organizational change currents.
-
•
Oxbow lakes metaphor warns that pushing hard in one direction can isolate teams or disciplines when larger economic or organizational 'floods' reshape the context.
-
•
Estuaries metaphor highlights the creative potential at boundaries where different disciplines and perspectives mix, but also the sensitivity and fragility of such ecosystems.
-
•
Patient opportunism—choosing when to leverage currents and when to push against them—is critical to long-term success and avoiding burnout in integrative roles.
-
•
Many key decisions impacting customer experience happen in engineering or architecture teams that may not traditionally include service design participation.
-
•
Perceptions of progress can be skewed; although some disciplines feel stagnated, other evolving disciplines offer opportunities for collaboration and innovation.
Notable Quotes
"You have to go from being able to deliver a message in three bullets and then turn around in the next moment and deliver a massive service blueprint or customer journey."
"Maturity is not linear; the tanker company had a lot to learn from the speedboat, and vice versa."
"Everyone is circling around similar topics but in very different ways—there’s a battle of models but more similarities than differences."
"Sometimes leaders focus so much on scanning the river they’re not observing the surroundings—the banks tell you if the river is deep or shallow."
"If you need to cross a dangerous river, you don’t paddle straight into it; you use the opposing force of the river to move forward."
"Trying to force one preeminent model for the company is a recipe for disaster—embrace models and understand why people are using them."
"It is impossible to survive in this industry by pushing against the current all the time; you must put yourself in positions to leverage the current."
"Some of the most important decisions for service design happen on whiteboards among engineers, often without service design representation."
"The estuary is highly resilient but also very sensitive to industrial waste—creative collaboration areas in organizations are similar."
"Patient opportunism means most of the time having the current at your back and only occasionally angling directly against it to avoid burnout."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Every manager who works with me knows their responsibility includes sourcing candidates for diverse backgrounds."
Dantley DavisLeadership & Diversity—A Fireside Chat with Dantley Davis
September 17, 2020
"At Adobe, we have a product equity team measuring how generative AI impacts gender, race, and other biases."
Frances Yllana Jorge Arango Maria Taylor Briana ThomasThe Big Question about Impact: A Panel Discussion
September 24, 2024
"What we do can potentially be bigger than optimizing conversion rates; it can help build a more peaceful world."
Jim KalbachPeace is waged with sticky notes: Mapping Real-World Experiences
June 14, 2018
"Design pairs gave strength in numbers, faster turnarounds, and more impact especially when paired with product managers."
Sarah Kinkade Mariana Ortiz-ReyesDesign Management Models in the Face of Transformation
June 8, 2022
"I had you all do a warm-up before we started to help everyone be present and calm."
Reginé GilbertAsking the Right Questions: Life, Hope and Moving Forward During the Pandemic
June 10, 2022
"The only thing any of us can control is how quickly we learn and then act based on that learning."
Robin BeersNavigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change
March 13, 2025
"I didn’t want to be an AI guy. That was never my goal."
Paul FordNew work, new words: A glossary for AI
June 9, 2026
"A centralized model for design systems can be problematic because it distances the team from end users."
Dan DonaldDesign Systems as a Vehicle for Systemic Change
June 1, 2023
"Changing branding and the look and feel should be possible with very quick and easy interactions, not taking another 10 weeks to customize."
George Abraham Stefan IvanovDesign Systems To-Go: Reimagining Developer Handoff, and Introducing App Builder (Part 2)
October 1, 2021