Oxbows, Rivers, and Estuaries: How to navigate the currents of change (without burning out)
Summary
For those of us in roles that aim to link experiences, see things end-to-end, or understand systems as ecosystems, the constant currents of change can make it feel like we’re endlessly adapting just to keep up. We long for a stable point of definition and clarity amid all this motion. In this talk, I’ll draw from my experience across various roles and companies to help you recognize and navigate the broader forces shaping our related fields. Using metaphors like oxbows, rivers, and estuaries, and with practical examples, I’ll share tactics for navigating change with intention, helping you stay grounded in the long game while seizing “act now” opportunities.
Key Insights
-
•
Integrative roles such as service design, product management, and UX research face unique boundary-spanning challenges involving complex cognitive and emotional labor.
-
•
Organizational maturity is nonlinear; fast-moving, product-led companies and slower, service-design-mature companies have complementary strengths.
-
•
There is a widespread 'battle of models' as different teams create overlapping sense-making frameworks like journey maps, value streams, and architectural diagrams.
-
•
Trying to force one unified model across an organization is typically ineffective; embracing diverse models and finding commonalities is more productive.
-
•
The river metaphor (water, obstacles, route, markers, safety) is powerful for understanding how to read and navigate organizational change currents.
-
•
Oxbow lakes metaphor warns that pushing hard in one direction can isolate teams or disciplines when larger economic or organizational 'floods' reshape the context.
-
•
Estuaries metaphor highlights the creative potential at boundaries where different disciplines and perspectives mix, but also the sensitivity and fragility of such ecosystems.
-
•
Patient opportunism—choosing when to leverage currents and when to push against them—is critical to long-term success and avoiding burnout in integrative roles.
-
•
Many key decisions impacting customer experience happen in engineering or architecture teams that may not traditionally include service design participation.
-
•
Perceptions of progress can be skewed; although some disciplines feel stagnated, other evolving disciplines offer opportunities for collaboration and innovation.
Notable Quotes
"You have to go from being able to deliver a message in three bullets and then turn around in the next moment and deliver a massive service blueprint or customer journey."
"Maturity is not linear; the tanker company had a lot to learn from the speedboat, and vice versa."
"Everyone is circling around similar topics but in very different ways—there’s a battle of models but more similarities than differences."
"Sometimes leaders focus so much on scanning the river they’re not observing the surroundings—the banks tell you if the river is deep or shallow."
"If you need to cross a dangerous river, you don’t paddle straight into it; you use the opposing force of the river to move forward."
"Trying to force one preeminent model for the company is a recipe for disaster—embrace models and understand why people are using them."
"It is impossible to survive in this industry by pushing against the current all the time; you must put yourself in positions to leverage the current."
"Some of the most important decisions for service design happen on whiteboards among engineers, often without service design representation."
"The estuary is highly resilient but also very sensitive to industrial waste—creative collaboration areas in organizations are similar."
"Patient opportunism means most of the time having the current at your back and only occasionally angling directly against it to avoid burnout."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Love principle is about emotionally supporting users, celebrating achievements, and creating visually beautiful products."
Yunyan Li Anna Le Jen KimUX Best Practices
June 11, 2021
"I felt this was a slippery slope—the blurring of lines between roles and responsibilities."
Allan LowsonRehashing the Double Diamond: Collaborating across functions with AI-assisted prototyping
June 9, 2026
"Every day is a chance to check: is this how I want to be? This is a long-haul, marathon effort."
Denise Jacobs Nancy Douyon Renee Reid Lisa WelchmanInteractive Keynote: Social Change by Design
January 8, 2024
"It’s either too late in the product cycle and we’re wasting money because we find usability issues after development."
Renee BouwensLanding Product Impact: Aligning Research as a Foundational Driver for Delivering the World’s Best Products
December 15, 2023
"Democratization is not research anarchy where anybody can talk to any customer for any reason with no oversight."
Jemma Ahmed Steve Carrod Chris Geison Dr. Shadi Janansefat Christopher NashDemocratization: Working with it, not against it [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
July 24, 2024
"Sometimes you’re too early. Don’t fear. File this away and keep your powder dry."
Sam LadnerHow Research Can Drive Strategic Foresight
March 9, 2022
"Reflection in action involves noticing surprise, questioning assumptions, experimenting, and reflecting on the move."
Yoel SumitroActions and Reflections: Bridging the Skills Gap among Researchers
March 9, 2022
"Direct action rarely gets what we want in complex systems; instead, we must know what we can actually manage."
Dave HoraResearch in the Face of Complexity: New Sensibility for New Situations
August 27, 2025
"You can’t evaluate bias if the AI can’t explain itself."
Daniel J. RosenbergDesigning with and for Artificial Intelligence
August 11, 2022
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How will the roles of designers, product managers, and engineers evolve as AI blurs traditional boundaries?
How do cultural differences like individualism versus collectivism influence responses to AI and job automation?
What are the technical challenges designers face when trying to run and update production code locally?