When UX Research and Institutional Racism Collide: A Case Study
Summary
Our recent UX engagement on a federal grant focused on a challenge in Alzheimer’s research: Black, Hispanic, and/or Latinx people are diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease more frequently than their white counterparts, yet participate in clinical trials, particularly prevention trials, at a lower rate. We were tasked with solving “usability issues” that prevented underrepresented populations from participating in research. Predictably, we surfaced more about inequality than usability. In this talk, we will share some of the mistakes we made and lessons we learned about broadening the definition of usability. Additionally, we will discuss how we articulated systemic inequality as part of our usability findings, and how this experience continues to influence our thinking about usability, inclusivity and anti-racism in our present research endeavours.
Key Insights
-
•
Usability in marginalized communities must consider historical trauma and distrust beyond standard metrics like time or error rate.
-
•
Clinical trial registries underrepresent Black and Hispanic Latino participants despite higher Alzheimer’s incidence.
-
•
Questions about race on forms can spark skepticism and suspicion due to historical abuses and systemic racism.
-
•
Showing diverse leadership on organizational about pages significantly boosts trust for participants.
-
•
Users evaluate organizations through leadership representation and background checks, not just website content.
-
•
Financial incentives for clinical trials are a valid motivator and sign of respect, especially for marginalized populations.
-
•
Designing for equity requires expanding the researcher’s role beyond checking usability boxes to confronting systemic issues.
-
•
Participant storytelling helps counter biased assumptions about motivations like altruism versus payment.
-
•
Building digital relationships with communities harmed by systemic racism requires transparency and reciprocity.
-
•
Researchers must be willing to take risks and be bold to advocate for equity despite client or stakeholder discomfort.
Notable Quotes
"My race has been treated like guinea pigs for most of our existence."
"Black people in general are sometimes looked at as disposable."
"Showing is better than telling, especially when it comes to equity."
"A website has no meaningful identity outside of the people it represents."
"I want to see pictures of your leadership and board. Do you have women, do you have people of color?"
"Payment is an important part of the research relationship for many users."
"There is no perfect user, and motivations can coexist within a single person."
"Mentioning incentives can build trust by signaling reciprocity."
"It's wrong to expect people to want to do more work with less motivation."
"Sometimes you just have to be a little bit bold and be willing to use your power and privilege to advocate for what you know to be true."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Rapid low-fidelity prototypes let us get quick feedback without stakeholders focusing on minor visual details."
Yunyan Li Anna Le Jen KimUX Best Practices
June 11, 2021
"We went from stitching wireframes to actually designing in code—no more simulacra."
Allan LowsonRehashing the Double Diamond: Collaborating across functions with AI-assisted prototyping
June 9, 2026
"I appreciate your allyship when I'm in the room, but I appreciate it more when I'm not in the room."
Denise Jacobs Nancy Douyon Renee Reid Lisa WelchmanInteractive Keynote: Social Change by Design
January 8, 2024
"At Meta, one product partner said quality doesn’t matter because we’re bringing in $90 billion a year."
Renee BouwensLanding Product Impact: Aligning Research as a Foundational Driver for Delivering the World’s Best Products
December 15, 2023
"Democratization is not research anarchy where anybody can talk to any customer for any reason with no oversight."
Jemma Ahmed Steve Carrod Chris Geison Dr. Shadi Janansefat Christopher NashDemocratization: Working with it, not against it [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
July 24, 2024
"You have to be careful not to be too weird; mental models differ internationally."
Sam LadnerHow Research Can Drive Strategic Foresight
March 9, 2022
"Knowing in action is the intuition practiced by competent designers, a core of artistry."
Yoel SumitroActions and Reflections: Bridging the Skills Gap among Researchers
March 9, 2022
"Democratization of research is interesting but not a one-size-fits-all; it needs quick assessment of what a team truly needs."
Dave HoraResearch in the Face of Complexity: New Sensibility for New Situations
August 27, 2025
"The AI is looking through material and that material’s changing every day."
Daniel J. RosenbergDesigning with and for Artificial Intelligence
August 11, 2022
