Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Learning Velocity—The Insights Speedometer
Summary
Measuring the success of research efforts is a critical capability in maturing our discipline and increasing our influence. This Advancing Research call is an opportunity to hear about “learning velocity,” how it’s being applied at Fidelity Investments, and what that could mean for you. Fidelity’s Jen Cardello, head of UX Research & Insights, and Jen Otto, head of Research Operations, shares how learning velocity has become a significant outcome that drives both ResearchOps initiatives (e.g., democratization) and the way they conduct and measure the effectiveness of research at Fidelity. Jen and Jen outline what learning velocity is and how it fits into Fidelity’s outcomes-based approach to research strategy.
Key Insights
-
•
Fidelity's UX research team faced huge scale challenges with 600+ product teams and only 35 researchers, making ubiquity impossible.
-
•
Focusing on research quantity, such as more studies faster, is counterproductive and considered poison; instead, learning velocity is the priority.
-
•
The democratization program trained over 200 designers and product partners to independently run unmoderated usability tests, cutting insight turnaround from 14 days to 3 days.
-
•
Quality control in democratization was ensured via a buddy system and approval gating in the testing platform to maintain high research standards.
-
•
Lighthouse centralized all UX research insights with strict standards on metadata and titling to reduce redundancy and make insights easily discoverable.
-
•
Lighthouse integration with collaboration tools like Microsoft Teams encouraged organic sharing and started building insight virality and empathy culture.
-
•
Continuous Discovery and Feedback (CDF) introduced a steady sprint cadence with dedicated researchers per initiative, aligned to living learning agendas prioritizing research questions.
-
•
CDF enabled transparency and cross-team collaboration, letting teams track when questions were posed and answered, speeding prioritization and strategic alignment.
-
•
Rapid recruiting innovations, including app push notifications and online scheduling, transformed a 4-6 week participant recruitment process down to hours or days.
-
•
Cultural acceptance was crucial; designers embraced democratization for autonomy and faster validation, while researchers accepted a shift from execution to facilitation roles.
Notable Quotes
"We cannot be everywhere. So is the goal to conduct more studies faster? And we said no, it’s not. That’s poison."
"The focus is on helping the organization learn faster to make smart, human-centered decisions."
"We had a backlog that made turnaround times at least 14 days; now teams can get answers within three days through democratization."
"Lighthouse reduces time spent searching for insights by having everything in one place."
"Democratization is about letting go of some research and enabling teams to learn from customers directly."
"The buddy system ensures quality by requiring study review and approval before launching."
"Continuous Discovery runs every two to three weeks with dedicated researchers tied to specific product journeys."
"Recruiting used to take 4 to 6 weeks; now, with app push notifications, we can fill interviews within an hour and a half."
"Designers want to learn how to do research because they get autonomy and faster feedback, not just waiting weeks."
"We shifted from an output mindset of how much work we do to an outcome mindset of the impact our work delivers."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We all want to design for scale, but empathy alone is sometimes a shortcoming when thinking about scale."
Nancy DouyonWe'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex
June 15, 2018
"Our big idea was big and they wanted it, but what they wanted way more was the foundational features."
Sarah FlamionComplex Problem? Add Clarity by Combining Research and Systems Thinking
March 31, 2020
"We must create spaces that allow nature to thrive within our cities."
Lena ShenkarenkoCollaborative Wireframing for Creating Team Alignment and Shipping Better Products
October 21, 2020
"Participants are usually very forgiving if you’re not a perfect screen reader as long as you explain what you’re doing."
Elana Chapman Li Wen Huang Divyen Sanganee Annabel WeinerGetting started with accessibility research
February 20, 2025
"China blew up one of their satellites with a missile, creating tons of debris, proving they can threaten our satellites."
Michal Anne RogondinoSaving Outer Space: The First UX Design System for Our Nation’s Satellites
January 8, 2024
"Position your discovery work as de-risking investments rather than just fuel for innovation or empathy building."
Mike OrenWhy Pharmaceutical's Research Model Should Replace Design Thinking
March 28, 2023
"Design and research at Compass have become so integrated that we become these powerful partners driving the product vision."
Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig BrookesWhat Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?
March 11, 2021
"The establishment mindset is colonialism manifest in the design world."
Jennifer StricklandAdopting a "Design By" Method
December 9, 2021
"The organization is bottom-up; there are no top-down yearly objectives we have to meet."
Mark BoultonOps without Designers
November 7, 2018
