Summary
Participant recruitment is often regarded as the most difficult part of any design project. Oftentimes companies rely on recruiting agencies to handle finding participants. While there are some advantages to this approach, and cases where outsourcing is the best option, nowadays bringing research in-house can be simple, flexible, cost-effective, and fast. During this session we’ll be diving into the top 5 benefits of bringing your recruitment efforts in house.
Key Insights
-
•
In-house recruitment can significantly reduce study timelines, enabling rapid project launches and participant scheduling.
-
•
Working with recruitment agencies often incurs delays due to quoting processes and long lead times, sometimes requiring months of planning.
-
•
Transparency in recruitment allows researchers to directly monitor applicant qualifications and screening progress, reducing the risk of inaccuracies.
-
•
Recruitment costs can escalate quickly when using panels; in-house options can cut these expenses substantially.
-
•
Direct communication with participants fosters trust and enhances engagement, leading to more reliable study feedback.
-
•
The ability to control participant screening reduces the chances of bias and falsified data.
-
•
Using in-house recruitment simplifies scheduling and offers better flexibility for changes or last-minute scheduling needs.
-
•
Participants can easily be notified or rescheduled via direct communication tools integrated into the recruitment platform.
-
•
In-house recruitment allows researchers to better manage participant data and engagement, ensuring higher-quality results.
-
•
Utilizing a dedicated platform like User Interviews helps in reducing hidden fees typically associated with third-party recruitment.
Notable Quotes
"Bringing recruitment in-house means I can launch a project as soon as possible."
"Working with a panel requires about two weeks just to get quotes, which can really slow things down."
"There are so many hidden fees when working through panels; costs can end up being doubled."
"The average recruit fee for using User Interviews is usually around $45 to $90 per person."
"You can own your recruitment process from end to end, which is really exciting."
"It's crucial to communicate with your participants to manage their expectations and build trust."
"Flexibility in scheduling can really improve your workflow and participant engagement."
"With User Interviews, you get to see who is applying and who qualifies, which gives you supreme control."
"In-house recruitment minimizes the risk of engaging with professional test takers or scammers."
"Managing participant communication directly leads to smoother sessions and trustworthy responses."
More Videos
"Design operations is never done; it's always evolving."
Kristin Skinner Kamdyn MooreGroup Activity: A Deep Dive Into Value and Outcomes
October 23, 2019
"For complex tasks, notes need to stick around somehow; this refers to evergreen notes."
Jorge ArangoThe Best of Both Worlds: How to Integrate Paper and Digital Notes (1st of 3 seminars) (Videoconference)
April 5, 2024
"The video board is a digital canvas where your research comes to life."
Prabhas Pokharel Mayo NissenOrder and Chaos: New Ways of Collaborating on Synthesis and Storytelling
March 10, 2022
"The assistive technology tools on mobile are free and built into the devices, making access easier."
Sam ProulxMobile Accessibility: Why Moving Accessibility Beyond the Desktop is Critical in a Mobile-first World
March 10, 2022
"It's vital to weave a narrative into research insights to compel actionable responses from decision-makers."
Roberta Dombrowski Sam Duong WoloszynskiMaking Research a Team Sport
March 11, 2022
"We risk imposing one dominant way of designing over others."
Josina VinkNavigating the pitfalls of systems thinking in service design
December 4, 2024
"Our profession is undergoing shifts that go beyond our control, but we can identify leverage points to create change."
Angelos ArnisNavigating the Rapid Shifts in Tech's Turbulent Terrain
October 2, 2023
"If we can partner with someone doing well in the government space, we can mitigate our risk."
Ted NewardTheme 4: Enterprise Organizational Journey
June 4, 2019
"When they see a better way to do things, they’re more likely to buy into that change."
Maria SkaadenPanel Discussion: Methodologies and Work Environments
November 8, 2018
