A Consistent Culture of Design
Summary
Phil Gilbert outlines IBM's ambitious design transformation over two and a half years, aiming to embed a culture of design across 380,000 employees. He introduces the 'culture quotient' framework, emphasizing artifacts created by behaviors, the degree to which the culture embraces them, and duration of that embrace. IBM’s approach includes hiring over 450 formally trained designers, building relationships with top design schools like SCAD and RISD, and surrounding junior hires with experienced design leads such as Doug Powell and Denise Burton. Gilbert highlights the creation of rigorous intern programs led by Devon O’Brien from SCAD and the development of IBM Design Thinking as a lightweight, collaborative practice empowering multidisciplinary teams including product managers and engineers. Instead of a top-down mandate, IBM adopted an opt-in approach, accelerating early success and sustainable adoption. They also introduced a design language that balances consistency with implementation freedom, and purpose-built flexible design studios like the Austin location, encouraging movement and collaboration. Global studios in Germany, England, China, and other locations form a network unified by digital tools and collaboration platforms. Gilbert closes with cultural notes on change as a constant, unity without uniformity, and the importance of empowerment, collaboration, and the willingness to fail gracefully, validated by devotion from leadership including CEO Ginni Rometty.
Key Insights
-
•
Design culture can be understood and shaped using a culture quotient formula: artifacts created × level of cultural embrace × duration of embrace.
-
•
IBM set an ambitious goal to hire 1,000 formally trained designers within five years, hiring over 450 in two and a half years.
-
•
IBM emphasizes 'people plus practices plus places = artifacts' to generate meaningful design outcomes.
-
•
IBM Design Thinking is a lightweight practice focusing on collaboration around artifacts, not rigid processes.
-
•
An opt-in approach to embedding design thinking helped IBM accelerate early wins, avoiding top-down enforcement.
-
•
IBM built deep relationships with top design universities to recruit diverse new talent directly from schools such as SCAD, RISD, and Stanford D-School.
-
•
IBM created formal career paths for designers parallel to engineering, including Distinguished Designer and Design Principal levels.
-
•
IBM’s design language focuses on giving broad guidance instead of rigid pattern libraries, encouraging implementation freedom and evolution.
-
•
The Austin design studio was purpose-built with movable walls and spaces to foster dynamic, radical collaboration and creativity.
-
•
The program’s success depends on empowering not only designers but all IBM employees to become design thinkers who opt into the culture.
Notable Quotes
"We could create a sustainable culture of design and use it as our leading edge weapon of transformation."
"Culture isn’t just behavior over time, it’s the artifacts that culture creates and embraces over time."
"People plus practices plus places equals artifacts."
"IBM Design Thinking is about collaborating around artifacts and frameworks, not prescribing the process teams must follow."
"We decided to make it an opt-in program and that accelerated early wins and self-selected positive outcomes."
"Design thinking is the scientific method for the 21st century."
"We had an engineering culture that confused uniformity with design, and consistency with design."
"Our design language gives broad ditches on either side of the road with some nuance, but no rigid libraries at first."
"The Austin studio’s walls can be put up and taken down by a 90-pound person on a Home Depot shopping cart."
"We’re showing people how to collaborate like crazy and how to fail gracefully."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Systems thinking is an essential part of my own portfolio or playbook as a design leader."
Uday GajendarTheme One Intro
June 6, 2023
"The value of a design system looks different depending on if you’re a developer, designer, or stakeholder."
Dan DonaldDesign Systems as a Vehicle for Systemic Change
June 1, 2023
"Rapid research is really great if you wanna promote research within your organization, but it’s not supposed to be the only thing you do."
Feleesha SterlingBuilding a Rapid Research Program
May 18, 2023
"Only 38% of people actually looked at the company review information, even though it was crucial."
Jeff Ephraim Bander Ariane Rahn Philipp ReiterEye Tracking Gamechanger: Why Smartphone Eye Tracking will Revolutionize Your UX Research
March 11, 2022
"Accessibility is now considered not just a moral necessity and a human right but a business good because accessible products are better and easier for everyone to use."
Sam ProulxUnderstanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
June 6, 2023
"How do they grow and organize their teams to keep up? How do they scale their processes? How do they maximize efficiency and quality?"
Jemma AhmedTheme 2 Intro
January 8, 2024
"An AI algorithm that didn’t explicitly consider race still produced racial disparities by using healthcare costs as a proxy."
Raven VealDark Metrics: Illuminating the Negative Impact of Digital Health Design
March 12, 2021
"We have a daily seven-by-seven meeting where research shares insights monthly, and sometimes more often depending on projects."
Nicole Wright Ned DwyerDemocratizing Research at HoneyBook
March 9, 2022
"Most former extremists don’t come up with the idea of involvement themselves, somebody always approaches them."
Jim KalbachPeace is waged with sticky notes: Mapping Real-World Experiences
June 14, 2018
