Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Research Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Gold
Thursday, March 10, 2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Share the love for this talk
Research Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Speakers: Kathleen Asjes
Link:

Summary

The pros and cons of democratizing user research are heavily debated. Often this is seen as a black and white scenario where we are solely in favour or against it. But what about all the shades of grey we can explore? Depending on the situation there are both benefits and dangers that lie in democratizing our research practice. Kathleen will share her experience with research democratization. Based on this she will show a framework that will help you assess when it is an appropriate tool to further research maturity and when it might derail you.

Key Insights

  • Research democratization empowers non-researchers to conduct research but requires careful management to avoid poor quality and misuse.

  • Lisa Reichelt warns that research can be misused to prematurely validate ideas, suggesting no research is better than bad research.

  • Jared Spool critiques the term democratization, highlighting risks of arrogance in delegating research to others solely for convenience.

  • Kathleen proposes a framework based on organizational research maturity and researcher presence to guide when democratization helps or hinders.

  • When research maturity and presence are both high, democratization is optional and can build empathy but is not necessary.

  • In medium maturity but high researcher presence contexts, democratization helps others learn research by doing, improving early-stage involvement.

  • Low researcher presence but high maturity organizations can use democratization to advocate for more research investment.

  • In low maturity and low researcher presence situations, democratization can overwhelm lone researchers with administrative burden rather than freeing them.

  • Research done by democratized teams may lack coordination, risking duplicated effort and isolated insights.

  • Teaching others research skills supports professional growth and confidence but must be balanced with researchers’ hands-on practice needs.

Notable Quotes

"Research democratization is all about empowering people who are not researchers to start doing research themselves."

"If you have to choose between doing bad research or no research at all, you’re better off not doing it — Lisa Reichelt."

"Democratization can be used arrogantly if we just let others do research so we can pick what’s fun for ourselves — Jared Spool."

"Research maturity refers to how research knowledge and impact permeate the organization, not individual skills."

"Involving non-researchers firsthand helps them understand research’s complexity and when to bring in experts."

"Research democratization rarely frees up strategic research time; it often increases facilitation and ops work."

"Sometimes democratized research happens in silence, with little coordination, causing duplicated efforts."

"Allowing others to experience research firsthand can convert them into advocates for hiring more researchers."

"Sharing your skills and teaching others can boost your confidence and professional development."

"Democratization requires different approaches; there’s no one-size-fits-all solution."

Ask the Rosenbot
Alissa Briggs
How to Coach Enterprise Experimentation
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Shipra Kayan
Make your research synthesis speedy and more collaborative using a canvas
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Ian Swinson
Designing and Driving UX Careers
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Erin Weigel
Failure Friday #6: 90% of Everything I Do is Either Broken or Pointless
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Megan Blocker
Getting to the “So What?”: How Management Consulting Practices Can Transform Your Approach to Research
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Nalini Kotamraju
Research After UX
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Llewyn Paine
Day 1 Using AI in UX with Impact
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Caroline Jarrett
Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Dorelle Rabinowitz
The Magic Word is Trust
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Michele Wong
Helping Them Help Us
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Robert Schwartz
We're Here for the Humans
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Mariah Hay
Ethics in Tech Education: Designing to Provide Opportunity for All
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Asia Hoe
Partnering with Product: A Journey from Junior to Senior Design
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Greg Petroff
Everything is About to Change: Software as Material
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Lada Gorlenko
Theme 1: Intro
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Kaitlin Tasker
Fast and Fearless Inclusive Research
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold

More Videos

Giff Constable

"You’re never going to convince business people with product language, but you can with financial language they care about."

Giff Constable

Financial fluency for product leaders: AMA with Giff Constable

April 11, 2024

Kritika Yadav

"Don't design for a response, design for reasoning. Teach AI to think critically, analyze information, and arrive at logical conclusions."

Kritika Yadav

Optimizing AI Conversations: A Case Study on Personalized Shopping Assistance Frameworks

June 10, 2025

Alla Weinberg

"Meetings tell us what kind of conversations we are having and what kind of conversations we are not having."

Alla Weinberg

How to Build and Scale Team Safety

January 8, 2024

Harry Brignull

"From a legal point of view, taking money from people without their true consent is a tangible harm."

Harry Brignull Mark Leiser Robert Stribley

Beyond Clicks and Tricks: Why deceptive design has grown into a regulatory faultline

January 16, 2026

Kit Unger

"We’re typically designing products to solve really complex issues."

Kit Unger

Theme 2: Introduction

June 10, 2021

Sofia Quintero

"When you change people’s workflows, you are literally changing power dynamics."

Sofia Quintero

Beyond Tools: The Messy Business of Implementing Research Repositories

March 10, 2022

Jeff Gothelf

"The hardest part is changing the measure of success from output to outcomes, specifically changes in customer behavior."

Jeff Gothelf

The Intersection of Lean and Design

January 10, 2019

Kit Unger

"Our aspirations and anxieties are our users and messages, our passions and pet peeves."

Kit Unger Lada Gorlenko

Theme 3 Intro

June 10, 2022

Jorge Arango

"I resist premature optimization of tagging and structure; I want to be 80% there rather than perfect and distracted."

Jorge Arango

The Best of Both Worlds: How to Integrate Paper and Digital Notes (1st of 3 seminars)

April 5, 2024