Summary
In 2017, The Home Depot announced a $1.2 billion supply chain investment with the goal of better meeting the changing needs of both do-it-yourself and professional customers. This commitment, which was originally intended to come to full fruition on a five-year timeline, got an unexpected speed boost in the form of the COVID-19 pandemic. Home Depot saw an unprecedented increase in the volume of deliveries and a need for expanded deliveries capabilities and flexibility. This growth has not been without pain. Unlocking these capabilities necessitated transitioning away from siloed fulfillment channels to unified technological, operational, and communication experiences. Here, the THD Deliveries UX team saw an opportunity to deliver value at scale: dynamic supply chain configuration. This is the story of how Home Depot scaled their deliveries supply network administration to support an ever more dynamic and transparent deliveries network that serves their business and centers their customers’ and associates’ experiences.
Key Insights
-
•
Home Depot had four separate supply chains with siloed teams and systems causing fragmented delivery experiences.
-
•
Customer delivery expectations changed drastically after Amazon introduced two-day Prime shipping, pressuring Home Depot to modernize.
-
•
Anar built trust from the ground up by interviewing every individual contributor to understand their perspectives and define success metrics.
-
•
Anar created visual maps consolidating engineering and business contexts to bridge understanding gaps.
-
•
Rachel learned that moving partners from passive avoidance to active resistance reveals their fears and motivations, enabling better influence.
-
•
Persuasion tactics like consistency and consensus helped Rachel get senior leadership engaged and attending UX meetings.
-
•
Translating UX questions into telling statements rather than interrogative questions improved credibility with direct communicators.
-
•
Redefining empathy from problem-based to solution-based helped overcome the 'us vs. them' mindset between UX and supply chain partners.
-
•
Consolidating 10 configurable tools into one holistic supply chain management system improved scalability and user context understanding.
-
•
Cross-silo collaboration is rapidly replacing siloed decision-making, fostering shared information and customer-first priorities.
Notable Quotes
"Home Depot is the sixth largest private company in the US with over 500,000 employees, yet our deliveries experience was embarrassingly bad."
"Two-thirds of our internal team had experienced a late or lost delivery, reflecting real customer frustration."
"When I started, the team didn’t understand what the point of UX on the back end was; I had to win their hearts and minds."
"Engineers didn’t understand why they were building what they were building, and product managers didn’t understand what engineers were building."
"Moving partners from passive to resistant helped reveal their fears and motivations so we could tailor our conversations to them."
"Asking questions made our direct communication partners think I didn’t know what I was talking about; telling statements worked better."
"Empathy isn’t about absorbing everyone’s emotions; it’s about shifting from problem empathy to solution empathy."
"Involving partners means tell me and I forget, show me and I may remember, involve me and I will understand."
"We consolidated over ten tools into one supply chain management system with a user-led team of 4 UXers, 2 product managers, and 6 engineers."
"Before, silos ruled. Now, teams share information and make cross-supply chain decisions focused on customers and associates."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We do not have online indicators in our communication software, so people know they shouldn’t wait for an immediate response."
Ana FerreiraDesigning Distributed: Leading Doist’s Fully Remote Design Team in Six Countries
January 8, 2024
"User research can sound intimidating, so our first step was to make it simpler and more approachable."
Roy Opata OlendeHow Zapier Uses ‘All Hands Research’ to Increase Exposure to Users
August 6, 2020
"Teams only think about a specific customer obsession persona and lose sight of upstream or downstream effects and other personas."
Kit Unger Jackie Ho Veevi Rosenstein Vasileios XanthopoulosTheme 2: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"Not growing the team was disheartening but led me to create training for partners to start taking a user-centered approach themselves."
Abbey Smalley Sylas SouzaScaling UX Past the Size of Your Team
January 8, 2024
"AI has no understanding of consequences — humans are the ones to bring that understanding."
Helen ArmstrongAugment the Human. Interrogate the System.
June 7, 2023
"We answer questions differently when we’re living life and doing activities than when we’re sitting down facing the camera."
Bas Raijmakers, PhD (RCA) Charley Scull Prabhas PokharelWhat Design Research can Learn from Documentary Filmmaking
March 11, 2022
"If a group session with middle schoolers goes off the rails, one-on-one sessions can save the research."
Mila Kuznetsova Lucy DentonHow Lessons Learned from Our Youngest Users Can Help Us Evolve our Practices
March 9, 2022
"Using analogy is very difficult for AI because it requires a unique human ability to connect and engage through storytelling."
Weidan LiQualitative synthesis with ChatGPT: Better or worse than human intelligence?
June 4, 2024
"If you want to improve the product team’s understanding, frame UX value in terms of their language and goals, not just UX jargon."
Christian CrumlishAMA with Christian Crumlish, author of Product Management for UX People
March 24, 2022
