Summary
In this insightful fireside chat, Mike, a seasoned design lead with over 15 years of experience, discusses his evolving relationship with user research and design leadership. Although he humbly admits to not being a researcher himself, Mike highlights the critical role that research played at Twitter and now at Kraken, one of the world's largest digital asset exchanges. He emphasizes that research should be seen as a time-saving and impact-enhancing discipline rather than a bottleneck, particularly when advocating for research teams to be compensated equally to engineers, reflecting their technical expertise and influence. Mike also shares strategies for building and scaling research departments, including hiring, delegation, and organizational alignment, stressing the importance of securing high-level champions such as a CEO or CTO. He explains the unique challenges of conducting sensitive remote research in the crypto space, where privacy and geopolitical issues matter deeply. When addressing common resistance by engineering teams to research, Mike identifies hubris, lack of exposure to strong research, and directive leadership as key factors. He advocates for a culture where team members proactively improve processes beyond their defined roles, supported by behavioral evaluation frameworks rather than outcome-based ones, fostering equity and collective growth. Mike concludes with practical advice to mirror engineering career ladders for researchers to simplify compensation and promotion discussions and reinforce research's equal footing within tech organizations. The conversation is rich with reflections on equity, efficiency, and culture-building in research and design.
Key Insights
-
•
Research, when done well, saves time and prevents costly misdirection, making it an investment rather than a delay.
-
•
Researchers should be paid equally to engineers because their technical skills are equally essential to product success.
-
•
Aligning research teams under influential company leaders, like the CEO or CTO, is key to gaining organizational support.
-
•
Building research teams involves thoughtful hiring pacing to balance individual contributors and managers.
-
•
Remote research in sensitive areas like crypto requires special attention to privacy and geopolitical concerns rarely seen in consumer products.
-
•
Many engineering teams resist research due to hubris, lack of exposure to quality research, or top-down mandates ignoring user evidence.
-
•
Encouraging team members to contribute beyond their explicit roles improves processes and strengthens the team culture.
-
•
Evaluating researchers and designers on behaviors rather than outcomes ensures fairness and accounts for project context variability.
-
•
The research function should report to the part of the organization that can best leverage it, which may vary by company and context.
-
•
Mirroring engineering career frameworks for researchers simplifies compensation and promotion conversations, providing clarity and equity.
Notable Quotes
"I know less about research than anybody at this entire conference, I guarantee."
"At Twitter, I learned how much we were failing users globally despite thinking we were doing excellent work."
"Designers and researchers should get paid like engineers—it's time to value them the same."
"Research is there to save you time, not to take up time."
"If you go a day without making a single decision, that means all decisions in your team have been made correctly."
"I want people on my team to get outside their lane to help improve the team beyond their direct responsibilities."
"Many engineering teams think they know best and would rather take a road to nowhere than wait for research."
"Remote research in crypto is about much more than flipping through a feed; it involves sensitive financial data and privacy concerns."
"You have to find your champion as high up in the company as possible to push for research and equitable pay."
"Mirroring engineering’s career ladder for researchers stops weird conversations about titles and pay differences."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The six-month calibration cycle in tech gamifies performance but discourages a long-term vision for career longevity."
Chelsey GlassonExit Interview #3: Same as It Ever Was: What Leaving Tech Taught Me About Change
December 17, 2025
"There is a world of difference between what a participant says and what they actually do, and AI misses that completely."
Laura KleinHuman vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
March 11, 2026
"Imagine going to the hospital for an emergency and the doctor doesn’t believe you’re in pain because AI says so."
Dr. Jamika D. BurgeBroad Strokes: Connecting Design, Research, and AI to the World Around Us
June 7, 2023
"I may be ruining his experience because I’m forgetting it’s his experience, not mine."
Iram ShahClosing Keynote: The View from the Top
June 4, 2019
"The 10 am policy extinguished all fires by morning to protect timber but ended thousands of naturally occurring fires, intensifying disasters decades later."
Alicia D. JohnsonDisasters and the 21st Century
December 10, 2021
"We need to become data ethicists and curators, not just data vacuum cleaners, to prioritize quality data."
Lija Hogan Milan Mijatovic Sam Proulx Louis RosenfeldThree Years Out: Perspectives on the Near-Term Future of User Research
March 15, 2024
"We started to see children and teenagers as users, not just audiences."
Sofía Delsordo Kassim VeraPublic Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter
December 8, 2021
"Friction can be good, especially when protecting private information."
Ron BronsonDesign, Consequences & Everyday Life
November 18, 2022
"Creativity means a change in perception, moving from what is familiar to what may seem ridiculous initially."
Richard BuchananCreativity and Principles in the Flourishing Enterprise
June 15, 2018