Fireside Chat
Summary
In this insightful fireside chat, Mike, a seasoned design lead with over 15 years of experience, discusses his evolving relationship with user research and design leadership. Although he humbly admits to not being a researcher himself, Mike highlights the critical role that research played at Twitter and now at Kraken, one of the world's largest digital asset exchanges. He emphasizes that research should be seen as a time-saving and impact-enhancing discipline rather than a bottleneck, particularly when advocating for research teams to be compensated equally to engineers, reflecting their technical expertise and influence. Mike also shares strategies for building and scaling research departments, including hiring, delegation, and organizational alignment, stressing the importance of securing high-level champions such as a CEO or CTO. He explains the unique challenges of conducting sensitive remote research in the crypto space, where privacy and geopolitical issues matter deeply. When addressing common resistance by engineering teams to research, Mike identifies hubris, lack of exposure to strong research, and directive leadership as key factors. He advocates for a culture where team members proactively improve processes beyond their defined roles, supported by behavioral evaluation frameworks rather than outcome-based ones, fostering equity and collective growth. Mike concludes with practical advice to mirror engineering career ladders for researchers to simplify compensation and promotion discussions and reinforce research's equal footing within tech organizations. The conversation is rich with reflections on equity, efficiency, and culture-building in research and design.
Key Insights
-
•
Research, when done well, saves time and prevents costly misdirection, making it an investment rather than a delay.
-
•
Researchers should be paid equally to engineers because their technical skills are equally essential to product success.
-
•
Aligning research teams under influential company leaders, like the CEO or CTO, is key to gaining organizational support.
-
•
Building research teams involves thoughtful hiring pacing to balance individual contributors and managers.
-
•
Remote research in sensitive areas like crypto requires special attention to privacy and geopolitical concerns rarely seen in consumer products.
-
•
Many engineering teams resist research due to hubris, lack of exposure to quality research, or top-down mandates ignoring user evidence.
-
•
Encouraging team members to contribute beyond their explicit roles improves processes and strengthens the team culture.
-
•
Evaluating researchers and designers on behaviors rather than outcomes ensures fairness and accounts for project context variability.
-
•
The research function should report to the part of the organization that can best leverage it, which may vary by company and context.
-
•
Mirroring engineering career frameworks for researchers simplifies compensation and promotion conversations, providing clarity and equity.
Notable Quotes
"I know less about research than anybody at this entire conference, I guarantee."
"At Twitter, I learned how much we were failing users globally despite thinking we were doing excellent work."
"Designers and researchers should get paid like engineers—it's time to value them the same."
"Research is there to save you time, not to take up time."
"If you go a day without making a single decision, that means all decisions in your team have been made correctly."
"I want people on my team to get outside their lane to help improve the team beyond their direct responsibilities."
"Many engineering teams think they know best and would rather take a road to nowhere than wait for research."
"Remote research in crypto is about much more than flipping through a feed; it involves sensitive financial data and privacy concerns."
"You have to find your champion as high up in the company as possible to push for research and equitable pay."
"Mirroring engineering’s career ladder for researchers stops weird conversations about titles and pay differences."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Always design a thing by considering it in this next largest temporal context — a day in a month, a decade in a century."
Sarah Auslander Betsy Ramaccia Gordon RossInsights Panel
November 18, 2022
"Designing for AI means designing for behavior because you will not always get the same result for the same question."
Lukas Moro“Feels Like Paper!”: Interfacing AI through Paper
June 11, 2025
"Even though Craig and I work closely every day, we haven’t met in person yet, which shows how remote collaboration works well for us."
Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig BrookesWhat Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?
March 11, 2021
"We chose to focus on research because we wanted to mirror, a bit more robust, the capability of the design teams to understand client needs."
Benjamin RealMaturity Models: A Core Tool for Creating a DesignOps Strategy
October 1, 2021
"Safety is a state of our nervous system, not simply a feeling or relationship."
Alla WeinbergDesign Teams Need Psychological Safety: Here’s How to Create It
September 8, 2022
"Burnout isn’t caused by working too much; it happens when people aren’t stimulated."
Meredith BlackScaling Design Culture
November 6, 2017
"There’s no good or bad data, there’s how you use it and how you come together to create shared understanding."
Jill FruchterInconvenient Insights: The Researcher's Role is to Stay Curious
March 29, 2023
"You should not try to deliver your playbook from the ivory tower of design ops. It just will not be successful."
Gabrielle VerderberDocumentation Your Team Will Actually Use
October 3, 2023
"If you don’t need a designer to create designs, what happens to designers?"
Llewyn PaineDay 1 Using AI in UX with Impact
June 10, 2025
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What lessons from AI design in public health are transferable to other high-stakes sectors?
How has the shape of work evolved from foraging through farming and manufacturing to today's AI-driven economy?
How can designers and developers share a collaborative workspace that includes both design and code artifacts?