Summary
In this talk, Phil and Nathan engage in a deep discussion about transforming corporate culture through design thinking and relationship-driven work, particularly within IBM. Phil shares his ongoing journey since 2010 in scaling design practices across a vast, distributed organization, emphasizing organic team-level adoption and executive support for designers. Nathan highlights the centrality of relationships and shared meaning in driving value, asserting that culture and innovation emerge from deliberate, sustained conversations and experiences rather than mere persuasion. Both speakers underscore the importance of listening deeply to individuals across silos and acknowledging the complex risk environment of organizations. The discussion reveals how design must not only speak the language of business but innovate it, balancing youthful openness with experience, and how successful change initiatives require finding allies, framing wins in business terms, and piloting safely to gradually shift mindsets. Practical tactics include ethnography on internal stakeholders, framing successes to evidence new possibilities, and reframing risk to enable experimentation. The speakers reflect on historical shifts that emphasized numbers over relationships and articulate a hopeful, adaptive approach to embedding design as a cultural craft in traditionally rigid business settings.
Key Insights
-
•
Design transformation in large companies like IBM succeeds when designers are embedded within business teams rather than centralized in studios.
-
•
Changing organizational culture is more effective through experiential learning and behavior change than through mere persuasion or theory.
-
•
Relationships are fundamental to innovation and culture, yet difficult to visualize and quantify within organizations.
-
•
Listening deeply and non-judgmentally to individuals at all levels enables building empathy and meaningful connections that foster change.
-
•
Risk-taking is essential for innovation, but organizations must balance it with risk management through dialogue and safe-to-fail experiments.
-
•
Embedding design at scale requires executive support with direct communication channels while enabling organic growth from the team level.
-
•
Meaning and identity in design add value especially when buyers and users differ, requiring research on both to align priorities.
-
•
Youthful openness to learning can be more valuable than years of experience when adopting new cultural approaches to design.
-
•
Framing design efforts in terms of existing business goals and language helps secure allies and advance cultural change.
-
•
Top-down mandates alone often fail to create lasting change; combining grassroots adoption with leadership support is more effective.
Notable Quotes
"It’s really about design doing, not just knowing the theory but acting and behaving differently."
"Without relationship, there is no value. You can’t have culture without relationships either."
"Every team that’s come into the program has self-selected in. They want in and are trying to do the right thing."
"A leader is someone who clearly communicates a vision that other people want to follow."
"The conversation about risk needs to shift to what’s the acceptable amount compared to the value of the opportunity."
"Listening deeply with no judgment allows you to start making profound invitations across silos."
"Most people don’t come to work to make their own life harder or work on a bad product."
"We rejected a studio model because designers should take business direction from the teams they’re embedded in."
"We’re building a program here that lasts through 2025 and 2030, so we can take risks on entry level folks."
"You have to speak the language of business and innovate that language to show what design can do together."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"I dreamed about work every night for a year as I was learning the language of corporate tech jargon and ux terms."
Rachel Radway Katie Bingham Joe WiertelThe Many Paths Of Design Operations
September 8, 2022
"The question who are most people is confusing when applied to assistive technology users in usability scales."
Sam ProulxSUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
September 29, 2021
"Service design has a critical role in mapping human and agent interactions in an AI and automation world."
Dharani PereraThe mandala of service design: unlocking alignment and action through service design
November 20, 2025
"Collecting habit path data in every study over time builds a data set that informs product decisions."
Paula BachImproving Legacy Software: How Much Better Does it Have to Be?
March 11, 2022
"Match the moment. Calibrate the altitude and the type of feedback to the context."
Vanessa VarinFeedback: The Other F-Word
September 10, 2025
"We have this tendency that once we’ve made this big mega map, we think we’ve captured the system in its entirety."
Josina VinkNavigating the pitfalls of systems thinking in service design
December 4, 2024
"We are people who are chosen — our craft is to interact with other people, and that’s not what we’re seeing in the world around us."
Robert FabricantShifting dynamics: The evolving relationship between researchers, participants, and organizational systems
March 11, 2025
"If you hire by portfolio visual impact, industry experience, and price alone, you’re probably making the wrong choice."
Melinda BelcherInsider preview of Enterprise Experience 2020
May 28, 2020
"Designers need to be facilitators of other people's expertise and knowledge, not just creators of designed things."
Sheryl CababaExpanding Your Design Lens with Systems Thinking
February 23, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can UX researchers move beyond being translators to designing processes for collective team reasoning?
Why does AI still fall short in fully automating proposal writing for bespoke research projects?
What organizational structures make it difficult to integrate UX research insights with growth metrics?