Summary
In this high-pressure scenario, the challenge was to conduct 17 user interviews in three days and synthesize a comprehensive report in just one additional day. I’ll explore how we used AI to streamline the research process, from transcription to synthesis, and how tools like ChatGPT contributed to efficient data processing and insight generation. We’ll reflect on the potential and pitfalls of using AI in accelerated user research, from practical aspects to more philosophical considerations on potential changes to the research process. Takeaways Practical insights into integrating AI with traditional research methodologies to expedite the research process An overview of the effectiveness of AI transcription and synthesis tools in real-world research scenarios Critical examination of AI's role in data processing and how it compares with human analysis Strategic considerations for service designers when employing AI to support rapid user research Reflection on the ethical implications and potential impact on the quality of insights and researcher well-being when relying on AI to speed up research processes
Key Insights
-
•
Generative AI speeds textual content generation and navigation but needs human guidance for meaningful interpretation.
-
•
AI struggles to track and assign specific interviewees to user archetypes without explicit human instruction.
-
•
A semi-automated workflow combining AI brainstorming and human refinement delivers faster synthesis under tight deadlines.
-
•
ChatGPT excels at brainstorming clustering parameters and generating detailed archetype descriptions when properly guided.
-
•
AI can retrieve relevant interview quotes but often requires multiple prompt iterations to produce longer, contextually fitting excerpts.
-
•
Visual generation of archetypes using DALL·E currently yields poor results and often contradicts instructions.
-
•
Token limits can constrain transcript processing, but newer models like GPT-4 improve handling of larger inputs.
-
•
AI behaves like an 'alien intern'—powerful but unaware of design research processes and simple context details unless taught.
-
•
Using AI as a creative partner helps overcome cognitive overload, especially in rapid, solo research scenarios.
-
•
Less experienced researchers require caution when using AI tools, as expert evaluation is crucial for output quality.
Notable Quotes
"Gene AI can really help to speed up synthesis moments connected to textual content generation and navigation."
"AI behaves like an alien intern because it’s not capable of making sense of some things easy for us."
"I approached the GPT as if it were my human colleague, asking very open questions."
"It couldn’t find specific interviewees for user archetypes, so I had to adapt and guide the process."
"This is a hero moment because it accelerates and simplifies exploration of clustering options."
"Text generation is the biggest superpower of ChatGPT in research synthesis right now."
"Visuals from DALL·E didn’t work well; I asked multiple times to remove cables but they still appeared."
"AI can help manage cognitive overload and speed up work when you have short timeframes and no team."
"You need a lot of annoying handholding with the AI: reminding it of how many people you have or simple things."
"I wouldn’t leave AI tools to juniors because it’s crucial to have your own experience to evaluate outputs."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"This is where UX and product strategy bring huge value—defining what good means rather than leaving it to engineers alone."
Peter Van DijckBuilding impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 2: Evals are your moat
July 23, 2025
"We need to end the reign of features and complexity—too much time making stuff, not enough using it."
Chris Geison Cristen Torrey Eric MahlstedtWhat is Research Strategy?: A Panel of Research Leaders Discuss this Emergent Question
March 4, 2021
"There’s a frustrating gap between what a designer envisions and what actually gets implemented, leaving live prototypes inconsistent."
Jack BeharHow to Build Prototypes that Behave like an End-Product
December 6, 2022
"Not growing the team was disheartening but led me to create training for partners to start taking a user-centered approach themselves."
Abbey Smalley Sylas SouzaScaling UX Past the Size of Your Team
January 8, 2024
"Who needs a designer when we have generative AI?"
Jon FukudaTheme One Intro
October 2, 2023
"If an experiment I design made the front page news tomorrow, how would I feel about it?"
Erin WeigelGet Your Whole Team Testing to Design for Impact
July 24, 2024
"Applying traditional frameworks to design ops is like trying to fit a star in a box."
John Calhoun Rachel PosmanMeters, Miles, and Madness: New Frameworks to Measure the (Elusive) Value of DesignOps
September 24, 2024
"Listen hard, change fast."
Jacqui Frey Dan WillisPanel Discussion: Integrating DesignOps
November 7, 2018
"Starting with one line of business and showing success creates a trickle effect for broader organizational adoption."
Amy EvansHow to Create Change
September 25, 2024
