Summary
In this high-pressure scenario, the challenge was to conduct 17 user interviews in three days and synthesize a comprehensive report in just one additional day. I’ll explore how we used AI to streamline the research process, from transcription to synthesis, and how tools like ChatGPT contributed to efficient data processing and insight generation. We’ll reflect on the potential and pitfalls of using AI in accelerated user research, from practical aspects to more philosophical considerations on potential changes to the research process. Takeaways Practical insights into integrating AI with traditional research methodologies to expedite the research process An overview of the effectiveness of AI transcription and synthesis tools in real-world research scenarios Critical examination of AI's role in data processing and how it compares with human analysis Strategic considerations for service designers when employing AI to support rapid user research Reflection on the ethical implications and potential impact on the quality of insights and researcher well-being when relying on AI to speed up research processes
Key Insights
-
•
Generative AI speeds textual content generation and navigation but needs human guidance for meaningful interpretation.
-
•
AI struggles to track and assign specific interviewees to user archetypes without explicit human instruction.
-
•
A semi-automated workflow combining AI brainstorming and human refinement delivers faster synthesis under tight deadlines.
-
•
ChatGPT excels at brainstorming clustering parameters and generating detailed archetype descriptions when properly guided.
-
•
AI can retrieve relevant interview quotes but often requires multiple prompt iterations to produce longer, contextually fitting excerpts.
-
•
Visual generation of archetypes using DALL·E currently yields poor results and often contradicts instructions.
-
•
Token limits can constrain transcript processing, but newer models like GPT-4 improve handling of larger inputs.
-
•
AI behaves like an 'alien intern'—powerful but unaware of design research processes and simple context details unless taught.
-
•
Using AI as a creative partner helps overcome cognitive overload, especially in rapid, solo research scenarios.
-
•
Less experienced researchers require caution when using AI tools, as expert evaluation is crucial for output quality.
Notable Quotes
"Gene AI can really help to speed up synthesis moments connected to textual content generation and navigation."
"AI behaves like an alien intern because it’s not capable of making sense of some things easy for us."
"I approached the GPT as if it were my human colleague, asking very open questions."
"It couldn’t find specific interviewees for user archetypes, so I had to adapt and guide the process."
"This is a hero moment because it accelerates and simplifies exploration of clustering options."
"Text generation is the biggest superpower of ChatGPT in research synthesis right now."
"Visuals from DALL·E didn’t work well; I asked multiple times to remove cables but they still appeared."
"AI can help manage cognitive overload and speed up work when you have short timeframes and no team."
"You need a lot of annoying handholding with the AI: reminding it of how many people you have or simple things."
"I wouldn’t leave AI tools to juniors because it’s crucial to have your own experience to evaluate outputs."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Being comfortable with ambiguity means having team members who can bring structure to uncertainty."
Bassel Deeb Will OsbornDo More With Less: Equip and Lead Design Orgs Through Adversity
October 2, 2023
"It's time for us to shift our focus away from justifying our existence to leveraging our skills to drive strategy and measure impact."
Sarah Alvarado Nalini P. Kotamraju Anne Mamaghani Peter MerholzHow to make UX research leadership more effective [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
October 26, 2023
"Researchers were obsessed with scientific rigor while designers used balance, feelings, or intuition as their rigor."
Yoel SumitroActions and Reflections: Bridging the Skills Gap among Researchers
March 9, 2022
"Design Ops in government requires a lot of diplomacy – it’s about managing relationships and stakeholder expectations."
Michael LandEstablishing Design Operations in Government
February 18, 2021
"You earn your seat at the table by championing excellent customer experience and rallying the project team behind it."
Karen PascoeDeveloping Experience Teams and Talent in the Enterprise
June 8, 2016
"The biggest thing for me is that bots bring our human values to AI and help curb abuses."
Greg NudelmanDesigning Conversational Interfaces
November 14, 2019
"Chief of staff roles can be the Whip who troubleshoots operational issues, the Quarterback who frees the chief design officer, or the Forward who drives strategic foresight."
Silke Bochat5 Antifragile Strategies for a DesignOps 2.0
September 23, 2024
"The standard SUS question about needing a technical person to use the system is frustrating because many assistive tech users are very technical themselves."
Sam ProulxSUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
September 29, 2021
"I am responsible not just for insights but for my team's well-being, legal commitments, and fiduciary responsibilities."
Nalini P. KotamrajuTwo Jobs in One: Being a “Leader who is a Researcher” and a “Researcher who is a Leader"
March 10, 2021
