Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
In an environment of UX staff reductions, a focus on tangible design skills and tool expertise, quarterly profits, and angst over what AI means for the future of everyone’s jobs, what place does “theory” have? As designers and researchers we engage in theory every day by hypothesizing: “If we design it like this, then we will have outcome X.” The bigger the problem you’re trying to solve, the more important it becomes to have a theoretical framework about why you’re doing what you’re doing. The breathless parade of AI releases present the biggest challenges (and potential opportunities) in many years. As designers we should have a posture on how to shape how AI is used and its impacts. Much as the mid-century modernists developed coherent frameworks for understanding the relationship between form, function, and human needs, using novel technologies coming out of World War II, we must now articulate theories that help us make sense of this new landscape where intelligence itself has become a design material. Join UX researcher/strategist Adam Richardson and UX design leader Uday Gajendar for an exploration of how we might develop the theoretical foundations designers need to thoughtfully shape AI interactions.
Key Insights
-
•
Design theory provides a crucial framework to push back against AI hype and ground action in humanistic values.
-
•
Historical design movements like Arts and Crafts, Modernism, and Mid-century Modernism reflect responses to societal changes, integrating technology with human-centered ideals.
-
•
UX design originated from longstanding human-computer interaction research and established theories that are currently underutilized.
-
•
Affordances, once central to usable design, have been diminished in favor of flat aesthetics and revenue-driven incremental improvements.
-
•
Victor Papanek’s view of design as a liberal art calls for conscientious, sustainable, and socially responsible design against mass consumerism.
-
•
Design movements must be collective, hopeful, sustainable, and stand for meaningful ideals rather than oppose something or rely solely on individual passion.
-
•
Skill boot camps and tactical learning alone do not foster critical design movements or sustained impact.
-
•
Craft in digital design spans trade (making), stage (facilitating discussions), and statecraft (political relationship-building), all essential for successful design initiatives.
-
•
Systems thinking is needed to comprehend and communicate the cascading effects and trade-offs of AI and design decisions.
-
•
The presence of the maker's touch, embodying imperfection and care, is a vital human quality at risk of being lost in AI-generated work.
Notable Quotes
"Theory at its most fundamental just means if something A happens, then something B will happen."
"Designers are theorists whether they realize it or not — they create solutions that have intended and unintended consequences."
"Mass production is here to stay; how do we make it more humanistic?"
"Affordances seem to have fallen to the wayside in favor of flat design and revenue optimization."
"A movement needs to stand for something, be collective, hopeful, sustainable, and tangible."
"Skill boot camps don’t create a movement; they’re tactical and don’t provide a cohesive set of ideas."
"Craft means intent and care even in digital products; for example, the bounce animation of Google Maps’ pin shows someone cared."
"Knowledge is the material we’re working with in AI design, not just pixels or code."
"AI-generated imagery feels too shiny and perfect — unlike the human-made objects that carry flaws and presence of the maker."
"Trying to figure all this out in business settings is nearly impossible; we have to step away and foster ongoing conversations."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We need to work on relationships with stakeholders because that’s how things get done in complex systems."
Boon Yew ChewMaking Sense of Systems—and Using Systems to Make Sense of the Enterprise
June 6, 2023
"Statistical significance tells you if a change is likely not random, but it does not tell you if the change matters to your business."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"We have immature teams where design is still seen as aesthetic rather than strategic experience functionality."
Patrizia Bertini Alexandra Mengoni LeónPushing DesignOps’ Influence into New Global Markets
September 9, 2022
"If you can’t tell me your workflow, don’t talk about your tools."
Jacqui FreyScale is Social Work
March 19, 2020
"If you can crack the code on making a child and their parents more comfortable in healthcare, you can map those principles to adults."
Robert SchwartzWe're Here for the Humans
June 9, 2017
"What was important was that in the eyes of the customer, I conveyed the part authentically."
Tamara HaleWar Stories LIVE! Tamara Hale
March 30, 2020
"A kickback is a free flowing and life giving gathering that transforms and electrifies throughout the night."
Zariah CameronReDesigning Wellbeing for Equitable Care in the Workplace
September 23, 2024
"Synthetic personas created with AI are a horrible substitute for real user research."
Dave Hoffer Joanne WeaverUX Job Search AMA #3 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
July 16, 2025
"Stakeholder support is pretty important because if people on your team just don’t have time, they’re not gonna be able to commit to their roles."
Feleesha SterlingBuilding a Rapid Research Program
May 18, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What systematic approach can design ops use for better decision making to avoid costly mistakes?
What does it mean for design ops to shift from managing existing processes to architecting infrastructure and cultural change at scale?
How can automation tools like Coda improve product planning and cross-team collaboration?