Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
NPS, SUS, HEART, CSAT, CES, CLI—the list of ambiguous acronyms goes on and on. Companies are under more pressure than ever to measure and quantify their results and their interactions with customers, but finding the right metric and the right approach is a challenging process that risks leaving key factors behind as you commit to one sole standard. However, what if there is another way to measure digital transformation and how people see your services? This is what this presentation will focus on. You will learn how to navigate the pitfalls of standardized metrics—with their pros and cons—and learn how to build and implement a custom metric framework that incorporates the best aspects of Net Promoter Score, Customer Effort Score, System Usability Scale, and other, into one cohesive and modern whole aimed at developing the actionability and traceability of your operations and customer services. Attendees takeaways include: how to develop a custom framework without losing benchmarking capability, identifying gaps and needs from this framework that is not focused solely on operational numbers, and how to wade through the murky waters of digital experience quantification. Bring your best questions and leave with actionable insights that you can put in use immediately.
Key Insights
-
•
NPS often obscures diverse customer experiences by aggregating different user segments into a single score.
-
•
Custom metric frameworks combining behavioral, attitudinal, and quality-of-experience data yield richer insights than standardized metrics.
-
•
Separating attitudinal (feelings) and behavioral (actions) metrics avoids the risk of conflating different dimensions of user experience.
-
•
Quantitative data should be supplemented with qualitative verbatims analyzed via sentiment analysis for fuller context.
-
•
Business leadership prefers simple headline metrics, so complex multi-dimensional data must be distilled carefully, often accompanied by storytelling.
-
•
Existing UX metrics frameworks like NASA TLX, SUS, SuperQ, and Google HEART offer valuable components but may need adaptation for specific digital contexts.
-
•
Designing useful metrics starts by clarifying goals, then defining quantity, signals, timeframe, and scope explicitly.
-
•
High conversion rates alone can be misleading without considering total volume of conversions and user behaviors in context.
-
•
Customer sentiment is complex and may not align directly with retention or recommendation behavior, so metrics must capture nuance.
-
•
Short, targeted surveys on key user journeys help balance depth of insight with user willingness to respond.
Notable Quotes
"A user-centered measurement should not be one dimensional because people are complex."
"NPS scores can rise overall, yet new and existing customers might have completely different views that get obscured."
"A metric is usually the result of a relation between two measures, not interchangeable with a measure itself."
"Customers tend to inflate negative feelings in surveys, but that doesn't always reflect their actual behavior."
"We aim to keep the reporting simple for stakeholders while incorporating multiple data points in the background."
"Combining behavioral and attitudinal data helps us understand not just what users do, but how they feel about it."
"We use sentiment analysis on verbatims to quantify positive, neutral, and negative customer feedback over time."
"Designing a metric starts with the goals, not the metric itself."
"Conversion rate alone isn’t sufficient; total conversions and traffic volume also matter."
"Including human stories alongside numbers helps business leaders grasp the complexity behind the metrics."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The more you can help product managers reduce risk, the more they will look at you as their best friend."
Catt SmallMoving from Execution to Strategy as a Designer
December 6, 2022
"Rules and responsibilities documents give people concrete steps they can take towards accessibility."
Laura SchaeferDesignOps: A Conduit for Inclusion
September 9, 2022
"The hardest part is knowing what needs to change but not having the influence to change it."
Eric ShumakeDiagnosis UX: Building Influence in Healthcare Design
April 9, 2026
"We can’t be there for every behavior after the nudge, nor do we necessarily want to be."
Marieke McCloskeyUser Science: Product Analytics & User Research
March 11, 2021
"In procurement, throwing things over the fence just doesn’t work; collaboration builds trust."
Melissa Eggleston Maya Israni Florence Kasule Owen Seely Andrea SchneiderPractical People Skills for Building Trust on Teams and with Partners
December 9, 2021
"The business doesn’t just want to do design better; they want the outcomes that design can make possible."
Jess GrecoCreating a Basis for Change: Scaling Design Maturity
June 8, 2022
"We make life or death decisions with design much more often than typical software design."
Teresa SwinglerLook, Up in the Sky! UX/UI for Aerospace
October 27, 2022
"If it’s not usable it’s not valuable."
Product and Design at Bloomberg: A 15-year Evolution
December 6, 2022
"Nearly 30 years into my career, I’m doing the most rewarding work of my life helping modernize military space systems."
Michal Anne RogondinoSaving Outer Space: The First UX Design System for Our Nation’s Satellites
January 8, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Why is prior authorization such a persistent problem and how can patient-centered solutions be designed around it?
What are effective behaviors that design operations teams should focus on to deliver value and build trust?
How can human-centric companion metrics be paired with traditional business metrics?