Don't botch the bot: Designing interactions for AI
Summary
It seems like every company is adding a conversational AI chatbot to their website lately, but how do you actually go about making these experiences valuable and intuitive? Savannah Carlin will present a case study on a conversational AI chatbot—Marqeta Docs AI—that she designed for a developer documentation site in the fintech industry. She will share her insights, mistakes, and perspectives on how to use AI in a meaningful, seamless way, especially for companies like Marqeta that operate in highly regulated industries with strict compliance standards. The talk will use specific examples and visuals to show what makes conversational AI interactions uniquely challenging and the design patterns that can address those challenges. These include managing user expectations, handling errors or misunderstandings within the conversation, and ensuring that users can quickly judge the quality of a bot’s response. You’ll gain a deeper understanding of the intricacies involved in designing interactions for AI, along with practical advice you can apply in your own design processes. Take-aways What to consider before you add AI to your product to ensure it will be valuable, usable, and safe for its intended workflows The interactions that are unique to conversational AI experiences and the design patterns that work for them Common challenges in designing conversational AI experiences and how to overcome them
Key Insights
-
•
Defining a clear and specific primary use case is crucial before starting any generative AI chatbot project.
-
•
High-quality, thoroughly reviewed training data is foundational to delivering accurate and useful AI outputs.
-
•
Initial state messaging must clearly frame what the chatbot can and cannot help with to reduce irrelevant or off-topic queries.
-
•
Loading indicators for AI text responses should be subtle, with progress reflected by text appearing rather than distracting animations.
-
•
Supporting efficient scrolling and prompt review is vital since users frequently check and refine their inputs against often long answers.
-
•
Error states in AI chatbots shift from traditional fixed errors to helping users write better prompts to get more relevant results.
-
•
Transparency about accuracy, AI limitations, and source citations builds user trust, especially in regulated domains like FinTech.
-
•
Providing users with prompt engineering guidance via documentation significantly improves the quality of chatbot interactions.
-
•
Accessibility considerations, like keyboard navigation and screen reader compatibility, must be integrated from the start, especially given the large text outputs.
-
•
Chatbots can reduce customer support friction and encourage users to ask questions they might not have otherwise, enhancing user engagement with the product.
Notable Quotes
"If you have any doubts about the quality of the training data, do not proceed."
"You want to assist people in framing the interaction and setting their expectations correctly so they know how to be successful."
"The biggest difference with error states in AI bots is helping people write prompts effectively, not just recovering from simple failures."
"Loading text itself is a loading indicator; the letters appearing show progress better than jumpy animations."
"People often forget what they wrote and then want to check their prompt again before refining it."
"Every output should have at least three source links, almost like citations in a research paper."
"We had to be very careful about accuracy because we're in FinTech and compliance is critical."
"People started asking questions to the bot that they wouldn’t have taken the time to email about."
"It’s really important to be clear and transparent about what the tool is good at and what it’s not good at."
"Accessibility testing included making sure everyone could navigate it using a keyboard alone."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We allowed participants to look at all the photos taken and decide which ones to keep or delete."
Sarah FathallahLessening the Research Burden on Vulnerable Communities
March 30, 2020
"You can design the best service in the most terrible system and not improve the whole."
Luke Roberts Christian Bason, Ph.D. Amanda Woolley Ben ReasonPanel Discussion
December 4, 2024
"Applying systems thinking means changing one part affects the whole system — there’s no linearity in relationships."
Patrizia BertiniDesignOps + KPIs = Measure your Impact!
January 8, 2024
"Having honest conversations about where you want to grow can turn around a relationship or project."
Jennifer Bolduc Diane Gregorio Emily DayWhat's involved with getting people back to work?: A panel discussion
July 1, 2021
"Every piece of research we’ve conducted represents valuable context and insights that can still guide us today."
Katie HansenFinding the unknown in the known: Harnessing meta-analysis and literature review
March 12, 2025
"Design handoff is really about cozying up with engineers and getting closer to the final product."
Shipra Kayan Robert Kortenoeven Eileen TangEmerging principles for using AI in Design: What the product design team at Miro has learned from deeply integrating AI in their workflow
June 11, 2025
"Actors as standardized patients allow safe practice of healthcare scenarios when live environment testing is too risky."
Carol MassaDesigning Health: Integrating Service Design, Technology, and Strategy to Transform Patient and Clinician Experiences
December 3, 2024
"Private educators were surprisingly open to collaborating because they were hungry for change."
Sarah AuslanderIncremental Steps to Drive Radical Innovation in Policy Design
November 18, 2022
"Multimodal design is the design practice you probably don’t realize you’re doing already."
Cheryl PlatzDemystifying Multimodal Design: The Design Practice You Didn't Know You're Doing
April 4, 2024
