Summary
The Internet and Web have reached a tipping point. We’re now witnessing the surfacing of harmful patterns and norms that we designed—often unintentionally—into our products, services, and communities, and the world we live in. Designers who work in the enterprise are, like their peers in startups and big dotcoms, vulnerable and culpable and need to consider some big questions: How well do we manage our data? How inclusive are our development practices? How broadly and deeply do we think about the impact of what we build and deploy before we scale it for our customer base? We need to move forward with intent. We need to govern our digital spaces. A necessary first step towards that goal involves designers examining—with honesty and introspection—our role in the creation of what’s online. The World Wide Web is nothing more than the accumulation of what digital makers have put there. We made this mess, and we need to talk about how we are going to clean it up. Digital governance expert Lisa Welchman will reflect on how 25 years of passionate and agile web development got us where we are today, and the consequences of the lack of self-governance by the digital maker community. She will show us a path forward from this mess, outlining questions we can ask and steps we can take to govern better what we have created and what we will create in the future.
Key Insights
-
•
Digital governance is fundamentally about decision making and organizational responsibility, not just tools or workflows.
-
•
Many digital governance failures stem from unclear ownership of strategy, policy, and standards within organizations.
-
•
Collaborative governance involves multiple levels: core strategy teams, distributed content makers, working groups, and community contributors.
-
•
External vendors often deepen digital silos if not properly integrated into governance frameworks.
-
•
Governance can be designed to enable speed and innovation, not just control or restriction.
-
•
The internet and digital technologies undergo a lengthy maturation cycle similar to historic technologies like automobiles.
-
•
Algorithmic biases often reflect organizational biases; fixing algorithms requires fixing institutions.
-
•
Proactive digital safety can be conceptualized like crash-test dummies for online systems, focusing on inclusivity, morality, and safety.
-
•
Participation in internet and web governance organizations like W3C or the Internet Society is crucial but underutilized by digital professionals.
-
•
Generosity and sharing cultures, as exemplified by the development of the three-point seatbelt, are critical for progressing digital governance.
Notable Quotes
"People can have the same values and ideas but if you don’t tune them properly, you just don’t get what you want."
"Digital governance is about who’s supposed to make the decision, not what the decision is."
"Governance isn’t the byproduct of a project; digital is a system you have to design and iterate continuously."
"You can’t expect people to comply with standards if you don’t know who they are."
"Your external vendors may not have your organizational best interests at heart because it’s not their business model."
"Governance frameworks can facilitate whatever pace or style of work an organization wants."
"Every bad thing that can happen in the real world can now happen on the internet — and every good thing too."
"Human biases are the real problem behind algorithmic bias because organizations embed those biases first."
"We are the fix — everything online is made by people, so we can change it together."
"Governance participation isn’t optional if you want to avoid reactive impositions down the line."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
















More Videos

"There is still so much work to be done: from dealing with climate change, protecting wildlife, rebuilding infrastructure, feeding the world, ending disease."
Janaki KumarInnovate with Purpose
June 14, 2018

"You can’t make anyone else care. We’re asking the wrong question."
Sarah BarrettThe "How" of Enterprise Information Architecture
June 6, 2023

"Asking for help and humbling yourself is one of the most powerful ways to grow as a researcher."
Sam Ladner Megan Blocker Tanvi Dhond Katie Hansen Ricardo MartinsMethodologies: Beyond the interview [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
September 4, 2024

"UX researchers at Shopify travel across product lines to share expertise and knowledge continuously."
Alëna IouguinaDesigning Systems at Scale
November 7, 2018

"All it takes to be a good boss and a good teammate is being a darn good human being."
Kit Unger Lada GorlenkoTheme 3 Intro
June 10, 2022

"In enterprise, people often just want to not get fired — that’s a very important need."
Christian RohrerInsight Types That Influence Enterprise Decision Makers
May 13, 2015

"Acknowledging and validating what someone has told you creates psychological safety and trust in leadership."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Uday Gajendar Dr. Dawn Emerick Dawn E. Shedrick, LCSWLeading through the long tail of trauma
July 13, 2022

"Technology does not have a mind of its own; people with power set its trajectory and we can influence that."
Cennydd Bowles Dan Rosenberg Lisa WelchmanDay 1 Panel
June 4, 2024

"I honestly have gotten the most value out of just spending one-to-ones with folks and asking what matters to you and what we should achieve as a team."
Catt SmallMoving from Execution to Strategy as a Designer
December 6, 2022
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Where do operational boundaries typically break down, and how can early cross-discipline involvement help?
What role does storytelling at project milestones play in communicating design work to leadership in the federal government?
Why is it important to assign distinct roles to different AI agents when collaborating on a software project?