Summary
The Internet and Web have reached a tipping point. We’re now witnessing the surfacing of harmful patterns and norms that we designed—often unintentionally—into our products, services, and communities, and the world we live in. Designers who work in the enterprise are, like their peers in startups and big dotcoms, vulnerable and culpable and need to consider some big questions: How well do we manage our data? How inclusive are our development practices? How broadly and deeply do we think about the impact of what we build and deploy before we scale it for our customer base? We need to move forward with intent. We need to govern our digital spaces. A necessary first step towards that goal involves designers examining—with honesty and introspection—our role in the creation of what’s online. The World Wide Web is nothing more than the accumulation of what digital makers have put there. We made this mess, and we need to talk about how we are going to clean it up. Digital governance expert Lisa Welchman will reflect on how 25 years of passionate and agile web development got us where we are today, and the consequences of the lack of self-governance by the digital maker community. She will show us a path forward from this mess, outlining questions we can ask and steps we can take to govern better what we have created and what we will create in the future.
Key Insights
-
•
Digital governance is fundamentally about decision making and organizational responsibility, not just tools or workflows.
-
•
Many digital governance failures stem from unclear ownership of strategy, policy, and standards within organizations.
-
•
Collaborative governance involves multiple levels: core strategy teams, distributed content makers, working groups, and community contributors.
-
•
External vendors often deepen digital silos if not properly integrated into governance frameworks.
-
•
Governance can be designed to enable speed and innovation, not just control or restriction.
-
•
The internet and digital technologies undergo a lengthy maturation cycle similar to historic technologies like automobiles.
-
•
Algorithmic biases often reflect organizational biases; fixing algorithms requires fixing institutions.
-
•
Proactive digital safety can be conceptualized like crash-test dummies for online systems, focusing on inclusivity, morality, and safety.
-
•
Participation in internet and web governance organizations like W3C or the Internet Society is crucial but underutilized by digital professionals.
-
•
Generosity and sharing cultures, as exemplified by the development of the three-point seatbelt, are critical for progressing digital governance.
Notable Quotes
"People can have the same values and ideas but if you don’t tune them properly, you just don’t get what you want."
"Digital governance is about who’s supposed to make the decision, not what the decision is."
"Governance isn’t the byproduct of a project; digital is a system you have to design and iterate continuously."
"You can’t expect people to comply with standards if you don’t know who they are."
"Your external vendors may not have your organizational best interests at heart because it’s not their business model."
"Governance frameworks can facilitate whatever pace or style of work an organization wants."
"Every bad thing that can happen in the real world can now happen on the internet — and every good thing too."
"Human biases are the real problem behind algorithmic bias because organizations embed those biases first."
"We are the fix — everything online is made by people, so we can change it together."
"Governance participation isn’t optional if you want to avoid reactive impositions down the line."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We want concrete evidence that we are helping people make better decisions in their lives."
Patrick Boehler Madison KarasThe service shift: transforming media organizations to create real value through design
November 19, 2025
"Do what you can, where you are, with what you have — that’s how you show you can deliver."
Ted Booth Sam Ladner Fredrik Matheson Russ UngerDiscussion
June 8, 2016
"If any of those adjectives do not apply to how you’re feeling right now, we wanna know."
Louis Rosenfeld Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
October 2, 2023
"Inclusion means not just who’s on the program but who you’re researching and collaborating with as you create your presentation."
Louis Rosenfeld Jemma Ahmed Christian Crumlish Uday Gajendar Chris GeisonCoffee with Lou #3: What Makes for a Successful UX Conference Presentation?
May 2, 2024
"You could never do all this marketing alone—it’s all hands on deck, relying on different strengths and creativity across the team."
Molly FargotsteinMultipurpose Communication & UX Research Marketing
September 12, 2019
"We’re exploring if design ops should host a cross-product scrum team focused on visionary redesigns to have bigger impact."
Chris MosesStretching the Definition of DesignOps with Product Development
November 7, 2018
"It’s not just about being technically good; understanding people’s motivations is key to great app experience."
Nick CochranGrowing in Enterprise Design through Making Connections
June 3, 2019
"The missing hub is the design planning and management tool."
Jon Fukuda Ellie KryslDesign Planning and Management Support
October 3, 2023
"John Calhoun is going to talk to us about reaching our peak and figuring out if we’ve reached our peak and how to find the next one."
Alana WashingtonTheme 3 Intro
October 1, 2021
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can service design approaches support innovation decision-making in large public sector institutions like the OECD?
What are de-risking sessions in service design and how do they help prepare stakeholders for co-creation?
How can program or project managers support design ops activities when no dedicated ops role exists?