Summary
The Internet and Web have reached a tipping point. We’re now witnessing the surfacing of harmful patterns and norms that we designed—often unintentionally—into our products, services, and communities, and the world we live in. Designers who work in the enterprise are, like their peers in startups and big dotcoms, vulnerable and culpable and need to consider some big questions: How well do we manage our data? How inclusive are our development practices? How broadly and deeply do we think about the impact of what we build and deploy before we scale it for our customer base? We need to move forward with intent. We need to govern our digital spaces. A necessary first step towards that goal involves designers examining—with honesty and introspection—our role in the creation of what’s online. The World Wide Web is nothing more than the accumulation of what digital makers have put there. We made this mess, and we need to talk about how we are going to clean it up. Digital governance expert Lisa Welchman will reflect on how 25 years of passionate and agile web development got us where we are today, and the consequences of the lack of self-governance by the digital maker community. She will show us a path forward from this mess, outlining questions we can ask and steps we can take to govern better what we have created and what we will create in the future.
Key Insights
-
•
Digital governance is fundamentally about decision making and organizational responsibility, not just tools or workflows.
-
•
Many digital governance failures stem from unclear ownership of strategy, policy, and standards within organizations.
-
•
Collaborative governance involves multiple levels: core strategy teams, distributed content makers, working groups, and community contributors.
-
•
External vendors often deepen digital silos if not properly integrated into governance frameworks.
-
•
Governance can be designed to enable speed and innovation, not just control or restriction.
-
•
The internet and digital technologies undergo a lengthy maturation cycle similar to historic technologies like automobiles.
-
•
Algorithmic biases often reflect organizational biases; fixing algorithms requires fixing institutions.
-
•
Proactive digital safety can be conceptualized like crash-test dummies for online systems, focusing on inclusivity, morality, and safety.
-
•
Participation in internet and web governance organizations like W3C or the Internet Society is crucial but underutilized by digital professionals.
-
•
Generosity and sharing cultures, as exemplified by the development of the three-point seatbelt, are critical for progressing digital governance.
Notable Quotes
"People can have the same values and ideas but if you don’t tune them properly, you just don’t get what you want."
"Digital governance is about who’s supposed to make the decision, not what the decision is."
"Governance isn’t the byproduct of a project; digital is a system you have to design and iterate continuously."
"You can’t expect people to comply with standards if you don’t know who they are."
"Your external vendors may not have your organizational best interests at heart because it’s not their business model."
"Governance frameworks can facilitate whatever pace or style of work an organization wants."
"Every bad thing that can happen in the real world can now happen on the internet — and every good thing too."
"Human biases are the real problem behind algorithmic bias because organizations embed those biases first."
"We are the fix — everything online is made by people, so we can change it together."
"Governance participation isn’t optional if you want to avoid reactive impositions down the line."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
More Videos
"In 2023, design leaders were being restructured out and design relegated to a tactical, downstream function."
Doug PowellDesignOps and the Next Frontier: Leading Through Unpredictable Change
September 11, 2025
"Sustained collaboration with communities through advisory groups can help steer research to be more equitable."
Jemma Ahmed Subhasree Chatterjee Robert Fabricant Alexandra Jayeun Lee Ben RobinsCollaboration: learning from other fields beyond our own [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
August 7, 2024
"Storytelling helps gain people’s attention, build empathy, and improve understanding and recall of key points."
Sara LogelYour Colleagues are Your Users Too
March 29, 2023
"Are you really doing user centered teamwork when you're thinking about growing a team?"
Holly ColeUnderstanding Experiences: When you have to do more than work
November 8, 2018
"We need honest, transparent conversations about futures because the impacts can be huge and wide-ranging."
April ReaganLook, Think, Act: The Futures-Smart Design Organization
October 1, 2021
"Women experience systemic inequality simply by navigating a world that isn’t designed for them."
Mansi GuptaWomen-Centric Research: What, Why, How
March 29, 2023
"We’re not teaching the model anything; we’re improving our prompts and context."
Peter Van DijckHands-on AI #1: Let’s write your first AI eval
October 8, 2025
"My ideal state would be to sprout like a potato. That explains everything else."
Dem Gerolemou Alexis Oh Neef RehmanClimate technology fundamentals
May 15, 2024
"When the world outside is crazy, the team needs to know that at least design ops has things under control internally."
Maggie DieringerCreating Consistency Through Constant Change
January 8, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What challenges and opportunities arise when implementing new workflow processes in large legacy companies like Microsoft?
How does design ops anticipate and prepare teams for technological disruption and evolving designer roles?
What are effective strategies for designers to introduce systems thinking in organizations resistant to broad perspectives?