Summary
The Internet and Web have reached a tipping point. We’re now witnessing the surfacing of harmful patterns and norms that we designed—often unintentionally—into our products, services, and communities, and the world we live in. Designers who work in the enterprise are, like their peers in startups and big dotcoms, vulnerable and culpable and need to consider some big questions: How well do we manage our data? How inclusive are our development practices? How broadly and deeply do we think about the impact of what we build and deploy before we scale it for our customer base? We need to move forward with intent. We need to govern our digital spaces. A necessary first step towards that goal involves designers examining—with honesty and introspection—our role in the creation of what’s online. The World Wide Web is nothing more than the accumulation of what digital makers have put there. We made this mess, and we need to talk about how we are going to clean it up. Digital governance expert Lisa Welchman will reflect on how 25 years of passionate and agile web development got us where we are today, and the consequences of the lack of self-governance by the digital maker community. She will show us a path forward from this mess, outlining questions we can ask and steps we can take to govern better what we have created and what we will create in the future.
Key Insights
-
•
Digital governance is fundamentally about decision making and organizational responsibility, not just tools or workflows.
-
•
Many digital governance failures stem from unclear ownership of strategy, policy, and standards within organizations.
-
•
Collaborative governance involves multiple levels: core strategy teams, distributed content makers, working groups, and community contributors.
-
•
External vendors often deepen digital silos if not properly integrated into governance frameworks.
-
•
Governance can be designed to enable speed and innovation, not just control or restriction.
-
•
The internet and digital technologies undergo a lengthy maturation cycle similar to historic technologies like automobiles.
-
•
Algorithmic biases often reflect organizational biases; fixing algorithms requires fixing institutions.
-
•
Proactive digital safety can be conceptualized like crash-test dummies for online systems, focusing on inclusivity, morality, and safety.
-
•
Participation in internet and web governance organizations like W3C or the Internet Society is crucial but underutilized by digital professionals.
-
•
Generosity and sharing cultures, as exemplified by the development of the three-point seatbelt, are critical for progressing digital governance.
Notable Quotes
"People can have the same values and ideas but if you don’t tune them properly, you just don’t get what you want."
"Digital governance is about who’s supposed to make the decision, not what the decision is."
"Governance isn’t the byproduct of a project; digital is a system you have to design and iterate continuously."
"You can’t expect people to comply with standards if you don’t know who they are."
"Your external vendors may not have your organizational best interests at heart because it’s not their business model."
"Governance frameworks can facilitate whatever pace or style of work an organization wants."
"Every bad thing that can happen in the real world can now happen on the internet — and every good thing too."
"Human biases are the real problem behind algorithmic bias because organizations embed those biases first."
"We are the fix — everything online is made by people, so we can change it together."
"Governance participation isn’t optional if you want to avoid reactive impositions down the line."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If you are not on Slack, you are missing out on one of the biggest and most interactive parts of our conference."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
June 10, 2021
"Teaching others through hands-on projects and training sessions creates long-term advocates and grows your design footprint."
Stephanie WadeBuilding and Sustaining Design in Government
December 8, 2021
"Attendee cohorts meet daily in small groups with facilitators to share learning goals and deepen engagement."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Victor Udoewa Jennifer StricklandEverything You Need to Know about the Civic Design 2022 Call for Presentations
May 17, 2022
"You have to push against 200,000 years of human evolution to get researchers to create reusable knowledge."
Matt DuignanAtomizing Research: Trend or Trap
March 30, 2020
"Culture is the stories that we tell both ourselves and other people about who we are."
Deanna MitchellDesigning with culture: Unlocking impactful insights for Product and UX
March 12, 2025
"People often confuse prioritization with sequencing – understanding relative importance is one thing, but when and how you do things matters too."
John Cutler Harry MaxPrioritization for designers and product managers (1st of 3 seminars)
June 13, 2024
"I’m still early on in measuring accessibility impact but tying early bug fixes to ROI is promising."
Deanna Washington Bria Alexander Jon Fukuda Saara Kamppari-Miller Farid SabitovConnecting the Ops: Plenary Panel and Closing Circle
September 9, 2022
"What extent do our organizations become who they are because of the stories we tell them about who they could be?"
Brigette MetzlerScaling ResearchOps: Helping Researchers do Their Best Work
March 30, 2020
"The most important part of asking for feedback is not just the feedback itself, but introducing folks to the ideas and getting them on board."
Crystal PhilcoxThe Many Faces of Operations
November 6, 2017
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
In what ways has the measurement of service design impact evolved since the first edition?
How does the second edition of the service design book address the relationship between service design and digital products?
How can teams ensure their design and research tools support accessibility and inclusion?