Cleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers
Summary
The Internet and Web have reached a tipping point. We’re now witnessing the surfacing of harmful patterns and norms that we designed—often unintentionally—into our products, services, and communities, and the world we live in. Designers who work in the enterprise are, like their peers in startups and big dotcoms, vulnerable and culpable and need to consider some big questions: How well do we manage our data? How inclusive are our development practices? How broadly and deeply do we think about the impact of what we build and deploy before we scale it for our customer base? We need to move forward with intent. We need to govern our digital spaces. A necessary first step towards that goal involves designers examining—with honesty and introspection—our role in the creation of what’s online. The World Wide Web is nothing more than the accumulation of what digital makers have put there. We made this mess, and we need to talk about how we are going to clean it up. Digital governance expert Lisa Welchman will reflect on how 25 years of passionate and agile web development got us where we are today, and the consequences of the lack of self-governance by the digital maker community. She will show us a path forward from this mess, outlining questions we can ask and steps we can take to govern better what we have created and what we will create in the future.
Key Insights
-
•
Digital governance is fundamentally about decision making and organizational responsibility, not just tools or workflows.
-
•
Many digital governance failures stem from unclear ownership of strategy, policy, and standards within organizations.
-
•
Collaborative governance involves multiple levels: core strategy teams, distributed content makers, working groups, and community contributors.
-
•
External vendors often deepen digital silos if not properly integrated into governance frameworks.
-
•
Governance can be designed to enable speed and innovation, not just control or restriction.
-
•
The internet and digital technologies undergo a lengthy maturation cycle similar to historic technologies like automobiles.
-
•
Algorithmic biases often reflect organizational biases; fixing algorithms requires fixing institutions.
-
•
Proactive digital safety can be conceptualized like crash-test dummies for online systems, focusing on inclusivity, morality, and safety.
-
•
Participation in internet and web governance organizations like W3C or the Internet Society is crucial but underutilized by digital professionals.
-
•
Generosity and sharing cultures, as exemplified by the development of the three-point seatbelt, are critical for progressing digital governance.
Notable Quotes
"People can have the same values and ideas but if you don’t tune them properly, you just don’t get what you want."
"Digital governance is about who’s supposed to make the decision, not what the decision is."
"Governance isn’t the byproduct of a project; digital is a system you have to design and iterate continuously."
"You can’t expect people to comply with standards if you don’t know who they are."
"Your external vendors may not have your organizational best interests at heart because it’s not their business model."
"Governance frameworks can facilitate whatever pace or style of work an organization wants."
"Every bad thing that can happen in the real world can now happen on the internet — and every good thing too."
"Human biases are the real problem behind algorithmic bias because organizations embed those biases first."
"We are the fix — everything online is made by people, so we can change it together."
"Governance participation isn’t optional if you want to avoid reactive impositions down the line."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"After a year of D for D, nothing had changed. The initiative looked like just another check box."
Kaaren HansonStop Talking, Start Doing
June 9, 2017
"Being a positive deviant means confronting challenges with limited resources but innovative, community-based approaches."
Bria Alexander Ariel Kennan Charlotte Lee Sarah Brooks Emily Lessard Gordon Ross Joanne DongReflect and Chart Forward
December 10, 2021
"We have to remix familiar tools and frameworks so people in the organization recognize and trust them."
Ryan RumseyBusiness Influence Without Losing Your Soul
January 14, 2021
"Find your senior executive ally who understands design and go talk to them first — it works."
Amy MarquezINVEST: Discussion
June 15, 2018
"In a hierarchical culture, you ask permission; in an entrepreneurial culture, you ask forgiveness."
Megan BlockerA Selectively Scrappy Approach to ResearchOps
November 8, 2018
"Instructional design is definitely not just teaching classes; most of the ways I’ve applied ID have been straight into UX."
Zen RenTaking Inspiration from Instructional Design for Research
March 10, 2022
"We can start small, test and validate quickly with a three-week tag team—one PM, one designer, one researcher."
Ted NewardTheme 4: Enterprise Organizational Journey
June 4, 2019
"The hardest part is knowing what needs to change but not having the influence to change it."
Eric ShumakeDiagnosis UX: Building Influence in Healthcare Design
April 9, 2026
"Well-set-up AI systems pulling data from multiple company sources will have more context, but it’s still limited compared to human understanding."
Laura KleinHuman vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
March 11, 2026
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are best practices for onboarding and operationalizing UX research tools post-procurement to ensure adoption?
Why is play and hands-on experimentation critical when teaching design and AI to new learners?
Will AI eventually replace unmoderated usability testing with simulations of user behavior?