Summary
The Internet and Web have reached a tipping point. We’re now witnessing the surfacing of harmful patterns and norms that we designed—often unintentionally—into our products, services, and communities, and the world we live in. Designers who work in the enterprise are, like their peers in startups and big dotcoms, vulnerable and culpable and need to consider some big questions: How well do we manage our data? How inclusive are our development practices? How broadly and deeply do we think about the impact of what we build and deploy before we scale it for our customer base? We need to move forward with intent. We need to govern our digital spaces. A necessary first step towards that goal involves designers examining—with honesty and introspection—our role in the creation of what’s online. The World Wide Web is nothing more than the accumulation of what digital makers have put there. We made this mess, and we need to talk about how we are going to clean it up. Digital governance expert Lisa Welchman will reflect on how 25 years of passionate and agile web development got us where we are today, and the consequences of the lack of self-governance by the digital maker community. She will show us a path forward from this mess, outlining questions we can ask and steps we can take to govern better what we have created and what we will create in the future.
Key Insights
-
•
Digital governance is fundamentally about decision making and organizational responsibility, not just tools or workflows.
-
•
Many digital governance failures stem from unclear ownership of strategy, policy, and standards within organizations.
-
•
Collaborative governance involves multiple levels: core strategy teams, distributed content makers, working groups, and community contributors.
-
•
External vendors often deepen digital silos if not properly integrated into governance frameworks.
-
•
Governance can be designed to enable speed and innovation, not just control or restriction.
-
•
The internet and digital technologies undergo a lengthy maturation cycle similar to historic technologies like automobiles.
-
•
Algorithmic biases often reflect organizational biases; fixing algorithms requires fixing institutions.
-
•
Proactive digital safety can be conceptualized like crash-test dummies for online systems, focusing on inclusivity, morality, and safety.
-
•
Participation in internet and web governance organizations like W3C or the Internet Society is crucial but underutilized by digital professionals.
-
•
Generosity and sharing cultures, as exemplified by the development of the three-point seatbelt, are critical for progressing digital governance.
Notable Quotes
"People can have the same values and ideas but if you don’t tune them properly, you just don’t get what you want."
"Digital governance is about who’s supposed to make the decision, not what the decision is."
"Governance isn’t the byproduct of a project; digital is a system you have to design and iterate continuously."
"You can’t expect people to comply with standards if you don’t know who they are."
"Your external vendors may not have your organizational best interests at heart because it’s not their business model."
"Governance frameworks can facilitate whatever pace or style of work an organization wants."
"Every bad thing that can happen in the real world can now happen on the internet — and every good thing too."
"Human biases are the real problem behind algorithmic bias because organizations embed those biases first."
"We are the fix — everything online is made by people, so we can change it together."
"Governance participation isn’t optional if you want to avoid reactive impositions down the line."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"It’s not about giving up power, it’s about gaining authority through partnership and trust."
Jacqui FreyScale is Social Work
March 19, 2020
"Government contracts are huge but require heavy compliance and long timelines—heads we win, tails we lose little."
Ted NewardTheme 4: Enterprise Organizational Journey
June 4, 2019
"Most design ops professionals work fewer than 40 hours per week, with Europeans more likely to keep this balance than their US counterparts."
Angelos ArnisState of DesignOps: Learnings from the 2021 Global Report
October 1, 2021
"What would it look like if we could ask, how do I make this the absolute best environment for complex problem solving, instead of how do I take away all the annoying hard problems?"
John CutlerThe Alignment Trap
November 29, 2023
"It pains me to say, one of the tools they were using was MS Paint."
Elena Naids Liza McRuerThe Power of Difficult Conversations: A Case Study on How We Introduced Design Ops in the Federal Government Space
October 2, 2023
"Design maturity dictates how much influence design has outside the design group, impacting policy, finance, and other teams' decisions."
Sarah WilliamsVerizon_A Framework for CX Transformation
January 8, 2024
"We’ve enabled exposure hours for our entire teams, taking the heat off our recruiters."
Vicky Teinaki Michele Marut Tim ParmeeShort Take #3: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers
December 6, 2022
"There is no big idea — sometimes we just need to get the basics right and reset expectations."
Pippa LomasPaving the Path for Neurodiversity in Design
October 4, 2023
"We cannot be everywhere. So is the goal to conduct more studies faster? And we said no, it’s not. That’s poison."
Jen Cardello Jennifer OttoLearning Velocity—The Insights Speedometer
September 16, 2021
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Why should service designers not wait for briefs before engaging with projects?
How do professional services or consulting environments differ in design team health compared to in-house design teams?
Why do private sector innovation models often fail when applied directly to public sector organizations?