Summary
The Internet and Web have reached a tipping point. We’re now witnessing the surfacing of harmful patterns and norms that we designed—often unintentionally—into our products, services, and communities, and the world we live in. Designers who work in the enterprise are, like their peers in startups and big dotcoms, vulnerable and culpable and need to consider some big questions: How well do we manage our data? How inclusive are our development practices? How broadly and deeply do we think about the impact of what we build and deploy before we scale it for our customer base? We need to move forward with intent. We need to govern our digital spaces. A necessary first step towards that goal involves designers examining—with honesty and introspection—our role in the creation of what’s online. The World Wide Web is nothing more than the accumulation of what digital makers have put there. We made this mess, and we need to talk about how we are going to clean it up. Digital governance expert Lisa Welchman will reflect on how 25 years of passionate and agile web development got us where we are today, and the consequences of the lack of self-governance by the digital maker community. She will show us a path forward from this mess, outlining questions we can ask and steps we can take to govern better what we have created and what we will create in the future.
Key Insights
-
•
Digital governance is fundamentally about decision making and organizational responsibility, not just tools or workflows.
-
•
Many digital governance failures stem from unclear ownership of strategy, policy, and standards within organizations.
-
•
Collaborative governance involves multiple levels: core strategy teams, distributed content makers, working groups, and community contributors.
-
•
External vendors often deepen digital silos if not properly integrated into governance frameworks.
-
•
Governance can be designed to enable speed and innovation, not just control or restriction.
-
•
The internet and digital technologies undergo a lengthy maturation cycle similar to historic technologies like automobiles.
-
•
Algorithmic biases often reflect organizational biases; fixing algorithms requires fixing institutions.
-
•
Proactive digital safety can be conceptualized like crash-test dummies for online systems, focusing on inclusivity, morality, and safety.
-
•
Participation in internet and web governance organizations like W3C or the Internet Society is crucial but underutilized by digital professionals.
-
•
Generosity and sharing cultures, as exemplified by the development of the three-point seatbelt, are critical for progressing digital governance.
Notable Quotes
"People can have the same values and ideas but if you don’t tune them properly, you just don’t get what you want."
"Digital governance is about who’s supposed to make the decision, not what the decision is."
"Governance isn’t the byproduct of a project; digital is a system you have to design and iterate continuously."
"You can’t expect people to comply with standards if you don’t know who they are."
"Your external vendors may not have your organizational best interests at heart because it’s not their business model."
"Governance frameworks can facilitate whatever pace or style of work an organization wants."
"Every bad thing that can happen in the real world can now happen on the internet — and every good thing too."
"Human biases are the real problem behind algorithmic bias because organizations embed those biases first."
"We are the fix — everything online is made by people, so we can change it together."
"Governance participation isn’t optional if you want to avoid reactive impositions down the line."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Community and ‘the phone a friend’ are what get you through the hardest parts of working in government."
Sarah Brooks Jennifer PahlkaFireside chat with Sarah Brooks and Jen Pahlka
October 21, 2021
"Vulnerability in communication — admitting what you don't know — is a strength that builds trust."
Margot BloomsteinFostering Trust in Your Brand and Beyond
March 12, 2020
"Stakeholders start demanding better digital experiences at work because they expect the same quality they have at home."
Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne RogondinoTheme 1: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"If knowledge is difficult to find or hard to use, then all the great information doesn’t really help anyone."
Maria TaylorKnowledge is Power: Managing the Lifeblood of the Design Org
October 3, 2023
"People said graphical user interfaces are bad for accessibility and that blind people would have to stick to command lines forever."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
September 9, 2022
"Often we’re seen just as people who create personas or blueprints, but that’s not even what’s needed."
Dharani PereraThe mandala of service design: unlocking alignment and action through service design
November 20, 2025
"If we’re not able to talk about research as a basket of potential investments driving innovation or de-risking decisions, maybe we don’t deserve a seat at the table."
Chris GeisonWhat is Research Strategy?
March 11, 2021
"Both of our perspectives changed, and now we’re seeing that come to fruition through the product we’re building."
Scott Jensen Sarah Delaney Carmen LiuShort Take #2: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers
December 6, 2022
"If you feel uncomfortable or bullied, please let us know because it’s very important to keep the vibes positive."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
October 3, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How should I choose communication channels and message formats to effectively share research insights?
What are the challenges and opportunities posed by democratization of user research within organizations?
How can firsthand client involvement in field research contribute to long-term advocacy and support for ethnographic methods?