Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
This video is featured in the Evals + Claude playlist.
Summary
If you’re a product manager, UX researcher, or any kind of designer involved in creating an AI product or feature, you need to understand evals. And a great way to learn is with a hands-on example. In this second talk in the series, Peter Van Dijck of the helpful intelligence company will show you how to create an eval for an AI product using an LLM as a judge (when we use a Large Language Model to evaluate the output of another Large Language Model). We’ll have a look at how that works, but also dig into why this even works. Are we creating problems for ourselves when we let an LLM judge itself? This talk is hands on; and there will be plenty of time for questions. You will go away understanding when and how to use LLM as a judge, and build some product sense around how the best AI products today are built, and how that can help you use them more effectively yourself.
Key Insights
-
•
Evals are a foundational feedback loop defining what 'good' means for AI products, helping to measure and improve systems continuously.
-
•
Evaluating fuzzy, subjective AI outputs requires innovative approaches such as using LLMs as judges to score results.
-
•
Binary (yes/no) scoring is more reliable than rating scales with ranges because LLMs lack internal memory and consistency.
-
•
Starting evals early (week one of a project) drastically improves AI product outcomes, but many teams delay due to perceived complexity.
-
•
High-risk or important tasks should be prioritized for evals instead of attempting broad coverage.
-
•
Assigning a dedicated owner or 'benevolent dictator' for evals who works closely with domain experts accelerates feedback and quality.
-
•
Creating a written constitution of principles helps concretize AI behavior goals and guides prompt and model training.
-
•
Most current eval tooling is too technical, slowing iteration cycles and making expert involvement inefficient.
-
•
Custom feedback interfaces tailored to expert users significantly speed up evaluating AI outputs in domains like healthcare and law.
-
•
Diverse perspectives from UX, product, strategy, and domain experts are critical in defining and refining what 'good' means in AI systems.
Notable Quotes
"Evals are everywhere, right? Everybody's talking about evals. It is like one of the key things in developing useful AI products."
"You want to ask an LLM to evaluate the fuzzy stuff because there’s no black and white output."
"LLMs don’t have memory, so rating on a scale from one to five is pretty random. Better to have yes or no answers."
"One of the biggest problems in AI building is evolving your prompts and having a fast feedback loop."
"By starting to categorize risk in detail, you naturally lead to better prompts and better evals."
"A constitution is a very good exercise: write down your system’s principles and values to help guide its behavior."
"Use custom systems for experts to quickly review and rate outputs, making feedback cycles much faster."
"Evals define a shared definition of good with tests to measure it, and that is the secret sauce for building great AI products."
"Model companies are students in a classroom wanting good points—they’re happy to run external expert evals to improve."
"The more I work with evals, the more I think UX and product people need to be involved because of the need for diverse perspectives."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Digitaf changed the way parents experience early childhood by connecting them to affordable municipal services."
Sarah AuslanderIncremental Steps to Drive Radical Innovation in Policy Design
November 18, 2022
"The lipstick on the pig—cosmetic fixes give little impact without addressing deeper usability and business value."
Uday Gajendar Lada Gorlenko Dave Malouf Louis Rosenfeld Dan Willis10 Years of Enterprise UX: Reflecting on the community and the practice
June 18, 2025
"You will never get to the point where you don't have to teach UX over and over again because people forget and new people come in."
Susan WeinschenkEvaluating the Maturity of UX in Your Organization
January 15, 2020
"Voice control on mobile was developed primarily to support people with disabilities."
Sam ProulxMobile Accessibility: Why Moving Accessibility Beyond the Desktop is Critical in a Mobile-first World
September 8, 2022
"We thought a maturity model for user-centered design would have shown senior stakeholders the impact we were having, but we never had time to build it."
Kara KaneCommunities of Practice for Civic Design
April 7, 2022
"Some of the most important decisions for service design happen on whiteboards among engineers, often without service design representation."
John CutlerOxbows, Rivers, and Estuaries: How to navigate the currents of change (without burning out)
December 3, 2024
"When organizations have regime change, shifting high leverage points can cause catastrophic effects, sometimes destructive and unintended."
Erin Hoffman-JohnThis Game is Never Done: Design Leadership Techniques from the Video Game World
November 6, 2017
"I think to understand how they work, it’s not just understanding how they operate, it’s understanding how to make the sausage rather than consume the sausage."
Tom Armitage Carla Diana Kanene Ayo HolderDay 2 Panel: Looking ahead: Designing with AI in 2026
June 11, 2025
"Nudge to me now is much more about wiggle it and see what happens rather than expecting exact outcomes."
Jen BriselliLearning Is The Engine: Designing & Adapting in a World We Can’t Predict
April 16, 2025
