Why Ethics Can't Save Tech
Summary
As fake news floods our feeds and small businesses suffer due to disruption from startups, many tech designers are hearing exhortations to focus on ethics. There are tool kits, checklists and even a sort of hippocratic oath for designers to take. These efforts are laudable and understandable, and they can help in some ways -- notably, in reducing harms of bias. But ethics also have limits because private sector capitalism is a force that is much bigger than anything that any one person can do. Instead, a countervailing force, such as the public sector, is needed to shape our technology. How might designers better understand, and even seek to work with and strengthen the public sector -- whose role it is to shape society? Alexandra is the author of the new Rosenfeld Media title, Deliberate Intervention: Using Policy and Design to Blunt the Harms of New Technology
Key Insights
-
•
Ethical design can address some tech pain points but often fails to prevent systemic harms that occur beyond individual user experiences.
-
•
Systemic harms often emerge after technology deployment and are difficult to detect through standard UX research focused on pain points.
-
•
Many harms in technology contradict core business models, making them controversial and hard to fix through design alone.
-
•
Policy, driven by collective values, complements UX design’s focus on profit and user delight and is essential to mitigate societal harms.
-
•
Designers who understand both user problems and policy landscapes can more effectively advocate for harm reduction through legislation and regulation.
-
•
Cross-sector collaboration between design and policy is still nascent but shows promising examples like regulatory sandboxes in fintech.
-
•
User-centered design methods can and should be incorporated into various stages of the policy cycle to improve policymaking.
-
•
International contexts reveal different relationships between UX, capitalism, and public sector involvement, highlighting the uniqueness of the US tech ecosystem.
-
•
Civil society and consumer voices play a critical role in influencing design and technology policy, often pushing for accessibility and ethical considerations.
-
•
Designers should abandon the savior complex and recognize their influence has limits, encouraging collaborative systemic approaches.
Notable Quotes
"Design ethics can impact some harms of new technology but not all."
"Standard design research looks for pain points, not harms, and harms often cannot be identified in typical user research."
"Many tech harms run counter to business goals and can be controversial to address."
"Policy is ideally driven by values, while UX in the private sector is driven by delight and profit."
"How do we as designers connect more deeply with the policy world? That’s still a developing thing."
"Technology moves faster than policymaking — that’s the pacing problem we need to address."
"User-centered design methods can be used at every stage of policy making, from intention setting to evaluation."
"We should reconsider the savior complex designers sometimes have — we’re not all powerful."
"The future of our technology cannot and should not rest solely on the ethics of individual designers."
"I’m totally freaked out by facial recognition and wonder why we don’t get together as consumers to push back on bad designs."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Love principle is about emotionally supporting users, celebrating achievements, and creating visually beautiful products."
Yunyan Li Anna Le Jen KimUX Best Practices
June 11, 2021
"We introduced a context diamond and prototype diamond to impose guardrails around AI-assisted prototyping."
Allan LowsonRehashing the Double Diamond: Collaborating across functions with AI-assisted prototyping
June 9, 2026
"Every day is a chance to check: is this how I want to be? This is a long-haul, marathon effort."
Denise Jacobs Nancy Douyon Renee Reid Lisa WelchmanInteractive Keynote: Social Change by Design
January 8, 2024
"The sum is greater than the parts—how qualitative and quantitative research play together."
Renee BouwensLanding Product Impact: Aligning Research as a Foundational Driver for Delivering the World’s Best Products
December 15, 2023
"All data has bias, all data has problems, and all data has limitations. It’s about where on the spectrum that sits and being clear on your provenance."
Jemma Ahmed Steve Carrod Chris Geison Dr. Shadi Janansefat Christopher NashDemocratization: Working with it, not against it [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
July 24, 2024
"The boss’s son is no longer the default backup boss; there are now written rules accessible to all."
Sam LadnerHow Research Can Drive Strategic Foresight
March 9, 2022
"Students cannot be taught what they need to know; they can only be coached to absorb it through demonstration."
Yoel SumitroActions and Reflections: Bridging the Skills Gap among Researchers
March 9, 2022
"Monitoring for weak signals and early signs of emergence is as important as intervention itself."
Dave HoraResearch in the Face of Complexity: New Sensibility for New Situations
August 27, 2025
"Garbage in, garbage out—if the requirements are wrong, the AI will instantly create a useless UX."
Daniel J. RosenbergDesigning with and for Artificial Intelligence
August 11, 2022
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are best practices for building and scaling eval data sets with synthetic data?
How can designers use AI to create entirely new interaction paradigms instead of just improving productivity?
Why isn't slowing down or adding more checkpoints the effective fix to the challenges introduced by AI tools?