Making Research a Team Sport
Summary
- How to identify the right stakeholders for your research
- How to get different kinds of collaborators involved in your research
- How to make sure your research is being used and making an impact
Key Insights
-
•
Research is more effective and generates higher-quality insights when conducted collaboratively rather than in isolation.
-
•
Involving diverse stakeholders from product, engineering, data, marketing, sales, and customer success early in research increases buy-in and relevance.
-
•
Starting research projects with the end in mind—defining the intended decision and impact—makes insights actionable.
-
•
Writing hypotheses and decision trees before research helps clarify expected outcomes and guides analysis.
-
•
Sharing incremental and even unpolished updates throughout research fosters stakeholder engagement and appreciation.
-
•
Setting clear agreements and roles for stakeholder participation creates trust and manages expectations.
-
•
Storytelling with a narrative arc (beginning, middle, end) is a powerful way to communicate research findings and compel action.
-
•
Using collaborative virtual tools like Mural enables effective remote stakeholder brainstorming and involvement.
-
•
Stakeholder objections often arise from unclear context, lack of relevance, or vague asks; framing requests clearly and appreciating expertise encourages participation.
-
•
Even in nonprofits or quantitative surveys, framing research with clear decisions and incorporating story elements can enhance impact.
Notable Quotes
"Research typically is actually a group endeavor and is most effective when done collaboratively."
"Collaboration helps you look at problems from different angles, which makes your work more robust and nuanced."
"Begin every research project with the end in mind by framing what impact you hope to drive."
"If we learn X, we will make decision Y, but if we learn Z, we’ll make the opposite decision."
"Getting stakeholders involved from the very beginning helps build buy-in and excitement around the research."
"Sharing small, incremental updates about research progress provides visibility and makes people appreciate the craft behind the work."
"A story has a beginning that sets the scene, a middle with rising action, and an end with resolution—this structure applies well to sharing insights."
"Stakeholders might say no to research involvement if the context and relevance aren’t clear, or the ask seems overwhelming."
"People generally respond well to genuine appreciation of their expertise and perspective."
"Storytelling isn’t just for qualitative research; it’s also powerful for framing quantitative data to drive decisions."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"As the product journey progressed, research cadence got faster with prototypes and quicker feedback loops."
Dr Chloe SharpUsing Evidence and Collaboration for Setting and Defending Priorities
November 29, 2023
"I was talking with a person who said I’m like an idea machine, a 24-7 idea machine. The reply was immediate. It isn’t, you get used up and spat out."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"Design for one extent to many is Microsoft’s inclusive design motto that guides effective accessibility."
Amber KnablEmpowering innovation: The critical role of inclusive product development in the AI era
June 4, 2024
"Feedback isn’t about liking. Helpful feedback needs to be, is this solving your problem or not."
Dorelle RabinowitzThe Magic Word is Trust
June 15, 2018
"Personas need to push back. Conflict makes for better stories and better products."
Dan WillisEnterprise Storytelling Sessions
June 3, 2019
"DPMs can get overwhelmed quickly because they want to say yes to everything; managers must help say no."
Courtney KaplanTaking it to the next level: Career paths in DesignOps
November 8, 2018
"AI wasn’t the obstacle. Fragmentation was."
Bethany BrownRewiring operations with service design and AI
November 20, 2025
"Our job as researchers is not making reports or interviewing users; it’s providing actionable, correct insights."
Laura KleinHuman vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
March 11, 2026
"I tried different prompts and roles, but they didn’t fundamentally improve ChatGPT’s ability to generate meaningful frameworks."
Weidan LiQualitative synthesis with ChatGPT: Better or worse than human intelligence?
June 4, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are some signs or 'weak signals' that designers can follow when seeking new career directions?
How can I unify multiple solar system apps into a single cohesive home energy management interface?
How can organizations prevent design system knowledge from being an undocumented API surface reliant on specific individuals?