Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
This is part 1 of a 3-part series on prioritization, led by Harry Max, author of Managing Priorities: How to Create Better Plans and Make Smarter Decisions. Part 2 | Part 3 Prioritization is a deceptively tricky topic that lurks behind the scenes but informs everything. It’s a fundamental skill for organizations, teams, and ICs, and most people accept that it’s essential, but we are not taught how to do it. You can prioritize almost anything, not just goals, projects, and tasks; values, for example. Our main challenge is finding new methods to reach goals amongst multiple teams with conflicting priorities. There is some good news: there is a repeatable process model. And some approaches are better than others, especially for organizations and teams. This conversation will take the topic to a new level. It will also help you gain a profound new level of clarity about creating better plans and making smarter decisions.
Key Insights
-
•
Prioritization is often confused with personal productivity or time management, but it applies broadly to resource allocation within teams and organizations.
-
•
Top organizations manage prioritization intuitively even without explicit frameworks, by knowing what matters most and making tough trade-offs.
-
•
Priorities are not legitimate until they are properly prioritized by assigning measurable attributes and values to items for comparison.
-
•
Different levels of abstraction in prioritization require framing, such as comparing streams of small tweaks as a whole against large complex projects.
-
•
Having multiple simultaneous priorities is possible; urgency and value profiles differ, so forced ranking is often impractical.
-
•
Prioritization is as much a continuous process involving revisiting assumptions and adapting to new information as it is a one-time decision.
-
•
Clear ownership of prioritization responsibilities is essential to avoid confusion and ensure accountability in decision-making.
-
•
Confusing prioritizing work items with prioritizing customer segments or goals leads to misalignment among product and design teams.
-
•
Overprioritization without clarity leads to 'lack of a priority' problems, causing teams to spread resources thinly and reduce effectiveness.
-
•
Effective prioritization balances setting strategic direction with practical resource capacity allocation and must handle trade-offs gracefully.
Notable Quotes
"There’s a huge gap between theory and practice when it comes to prioritization in complex dynamic environments."
"Priorities aren’t priorities until they’ve been prioritized with attributes and values; otherwise they’re just items."
"It’s actually very hard to prioritize things that are apples versus oranges without framing them similarly first."
"People often confuse prioritization with sequencing – understanding relative importance is one thing, but when and how you do things matters too."
"If all 50 items are said to be important, you can’t do them all at once; starting randomly is better than stalling."
"Most teams have way too many false priority ones – their number one priority is the lack of a priority."
"Ownership means anticipating, observing, orienting, deciding, acting, and monitoring – there has to be a clear owner for these phases."
"Prioritization is as much about saying no gracefully as it is about saying yes to the right things."
"If you spend 15 out of 62 business days prioritizing and still don’t have a clear list, you’re probably prioritizing at the wrong level."
"What am I avoiding? Asking that every day turns out to be a surprisingly powerful prioritization tool."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
More Videos
"Laura let out a sigh of relief and said, I don’t think I could ever recover the way that you did."
Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II
March 30, 2020
"Layoffs are a collective trauma – it’s okay to acknowledge the emotions and grief you feel."
Corey Nelson Amy SanteeLayoffs
November 15, 2022
"Mixed methods research, combining qualitative and quantitative, gives the fullest understanding of customer experience."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"Self-report is not the end all; people often don’t know why they behave certain ways, especially regarding automatic motivations like deeply ingrained mental models."
Amy BucherHarnessing behavioral science to uncover deeper truths
March 12, 2025
"Every piece of product can be described using components like intent, viscosity, and flow—making UX a physics problem."
David SternbergUncovering the hidden forces shaping user behavior
July 17, 2025
"Using pilots can get buy-in from stakeholders who might resist broad change initially."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024
"Provocative prototypes provoke conversation and surface unspoken values."
Jennifer StricklandAdopting a "Design By" Method
December 9, 2021
"Employee experience and customer experience are inextricably tied—operationalizing design Ops impacts both."
Rachel Posman John CalhounA Closer Look at Team Ops and Product Ops (Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin)
November 19, 2020
"Service designers connect the dots, which represent elements, teams, processes, policies, and customer needs that all must align."
Gina MendoliaTherapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
December 3, 2024
