Rosenverse
Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You

Gold
Wednesday, December 8, 2021 • Civic Design 2021
Share the love for this talk
Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
Speakers: Sam Proulx
Link:

Summary

In this interactive session, Sam Proulx, accessibility evangelist at Fable, will draw from experience as a person with a disability, and from Fable’s thousands of hours of research experience, to answer all of your questions about conducting prototype reviews with people with disabilities. What design systems work best? What disabilities can participate in prototype reviews out of the box, and what types of disabilities might need special adaptations? What information should a prototype contain, to get the best feedback and engagement from people with disabilities? How can you, within the public sector, learn to better shift left, and involve people with disabilities as early as possible in the design process, and why should you? We’ll also have plenty of time for your own questions! If you’ve been wanting to conduct prototype reviews that involve people with disabilities, but weren’t quite sure where to begin, don’t miss this session!

Key Insights

  • Start accessibility testing with screen magnification users because they can interpret visual prototypes with minimal adaptation.

  • Involving users with physical challenges requires clear indications of hover states, control labels, click target sizes, and may require operating prototypes on their behalf.

  • Screen reader users cannot effectively use typical visual prototypes because they lack semantic markup; alternative prototyping using structured documents is necessary.

  • Accessibility testing should expand in a circle: from screen magnification to physical challenges, then to screen readers.

  • Addressing accessibility issues for one group often benefits other groups, creating a positive cascading effect.

  • Prototypes frequently lack critical information like semantic structure, focus states, keyboard navigation, and alt text needed by screen reader users.

  • Prototyping tools like Webflow support coding prototypes that better simulate real assistive technology environments but require technical expertise.

  • Considering platform differences (Windows, Mac, iOS, Android) is essential as assistive technologies behave differently across them.

  • Excessive white space can hinder usability for screen magnification users by forcing excessive scrolling.

  • Early involvement of people with disabilities in design avoids costly retrofits and leads to more effective accessibility solutions.

Notable Quotes

"The best way to build a fully accessible foundation is to involve the voices of people with disabilities at every step."

"Screen magnification users are low vision and interact visually with prototypes, so little adaptation is needed."

"For users with physical challenges, hover states can be very difficult, especially for eye, head tracking, or voice control users."

"Screen reader users require prototypes that contain semantic information like heading levels, control labels, and landmarks."

"You may need to operate the prototype on behalf of users whose assistive tech can’t click or interact with clickable prototypes."

"Fixing problems found for one disability group often helps fix problems for others too."

"When you magnify prototypes, they may look blurry, but that’s something to fix in the final website design."

"Webflow is an ideal tool for prototypes with code because users can test in the actual browser environment."

"Aim to work with at least one person on each platform your product supports, because assistive tech varies."

"You can create prototypes for screen reader users in Word, Excel, or Google Docs by simulating semantic markup."

Ask the Rosenbot
Roy Opata Olende
How Zapier Uses ‘All Hands Research’ to Increase Exposure to Users
2020 • Advancing Research Community
Erin Weigel
Failure Friday #6: 90% of Everything I Do is Either Broken or Pointless
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Melinda Belcher
Bridging the Gap: Making the Most of the Differences Between Agency and Enterprise
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Craig Villamor
Design Systems for Ethical Design
2023 • Enterprise Community
George Abraham
Design Systems To-Go: Indigo.Design Overview and Exploring the Developer Workflow (Part 3)
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Mansi Gupta
Drawing from Feminist Practice to Make Inclusive Design Operational
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Ariel Kennan
Theme Two Intro
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Theresa Marwah
How Atlassian is Operationalizing Respect in Research
2020 • Advancing Research Community
Audrey Crane
Shadow Design–Where Else is Design Happening in Your Organization?
2023 • Enterprise Community
Jon Fukuda
Theme 3 Intro
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Uday Gajendar
Leading through the long tail of trauma
2022 • Advancing Research Community
Shipra Kayan
How Tess Dixon Facilitates Team Engagement and Collaboration at Condé Nast Using Miro 
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Andy Warr
Under My (Research) Umbrella: The Benefits and Challenges of Building a Unified Insights Function
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Noz Urbina
Rapid AI-powered UX (RAUX): A framework for empowering human designers
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Christopher Geison
Theme 1 Intro
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Elizabeth Sklar
Co-creating research enablement with your tech org: a case study
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold

More Videos

Greg Petroff

"Our researchers talk regularly to the CEO and are closely involved in product decisions, making research highly impactful here."

Greg Petroff

The Compass Mission

March 10, 2021

April Reagan

"AI can be a great partner to humans if trained with fair and complete data, but we must be careful not to ship biased systems."

April Reagan

Look, Think, Act: The Futures-Smart Design Organization

October 1, 2021

Paula Bach

"Breaking a habit path can cause users to repeatedly retry workflows, leading to frustration and cognitive overload."

Paula Bach

Improving Legacy Software: How Much Better Does it Have to Be?

March 11, 2022

Louis Rosenfeld

"If your topic is already tackled exceptionally by a prior book, go deeper or wait until the market shifts."

Louis Rosenfeld

Coffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?

March 7, 2024

Sha Hwang

"There are many paths in and through and towards work in the public sphere. It’s not just a heroic narrative but coalitions that win progress."

Sha Hwang

The Lost Year

June 11, 2021

Louis Rosenfeld

"We have to move beyond linear solutions. Complex systems require us to explore our way through problems."

Louis Rosenfeld

Discussion: What Operations can teach DesignOps

November 6, 2017

Florence Okoye

"The trickster role in African storytelling reveals observersities in systems and shows new ways things should be done."

Florence Okoye

AfroFuturism and UX Research

March 27, 2023

Luke Wroblewski

"Context management lets you tell the system what to look at, whether it’s files, folders, or highlighting specific image regions."

Luke Wroblewski

Designing AI Applications

March 5, 2026

Bria Alexander

"If you have a question at the end of a presentation, please put that question in the thread associated with the talk."

Bria Alexander

Opening Remarks

March 29, 2023