Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
Summary
In this interactive session, Sam Proulx, accessibility evangelist at Fable, will draw from experience as a person with a disability, and from Fable’s thousands of hours of research experience, to answer all of your questions about conducting prototype reviews with people with disabilities. What design systems work best? What disabilities can participate in prototype reviews out of the box, and what types of disabilities might need special adaptations? What information should a prototype contain, to get the best feedback and engagement from people with disabilities? How can you, within the public sector, learn to better shift left, and involve people with disabilities as early as possible in the design process, and why should you? We’ll also have plenty of time for your own questions! If you’ve been wanting to conduct prototype reviews that involve people with disabilities, but weren’t quite sure where to begin, don’t miss this session!
Key Insights
-
•
Start accessibility testing with screen magnification users because they can interpret visual prototypes with minimal adaptation.
-
•
Involving users with physical challenges requires clear indications of hover states, control labels, click target sizes, and may require operating prototypes on their behalf.
-
•
Screen reader users cannot effectively use typical visual prototypes because they lack semantic markup; alternative prototyping using structured documents is necessary.
-
•
Accessibility testing should expand in a circle: from screen magnification to physical challenges, then to screen readers.
-
•
Addressing accessibility issues for one group often benefits other groups, creating a positive cascading effect.
-
•
Prototypes frequently lack critical information like semantic structure, focus states, keyboard navigation, and alt text needed by screen reader users.
-
•
Prototyping tools like Webflow support coding prototypes that better simulate real assistive technology environments but require technical expertise.
-
•
Considering platform differences (Windows, Mac, iOS, Android) is essential as assistive technologies behave differently across them.
-
•
Excessive white space can hinder usability for screen magnification users by forcing excessive scrolling.
-
•
Early involvement of people with disabilities in design avoids costly retrofits and leads to more effective accessibility solutions.
Notable Quotes
"The best way to build a fully accessible foundation is to involve the voices of people with disabilities at every step."
"Screen magnification users are low vision and interact visually with prototypes, so little adaptation is needed."
"For users with physical challenges, hover states can be very difficult, especially for eye, head tracking, or voice control users."
"Screen reader users require prototypes that contain semantic information like heading levels, control labels, and landmarks."
"You may need to operate the prototype on behalf of users whose assistive tech can’t click or interact with clickable prototypes."
"Fixing problems found for one disability group often helps fix problems for others too."
"When you magnify prototypes, they may look blurry, but that’s something to fix in the final website design."
"Webflow is an ideal tool for prototypes with code because users can test in the actual browser environment."
"Aim to work with at least one person on each platform your product supports, because assistive tech varies."
"You can create prototypes for screen reader users in Word, Excel, or Google Docs by simulating semantic markup."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"You don’t need everyone to agree on every term, but you need governance to decide roles and approvals."
Bram WesselEnterprise Information Architecture
January 10, 2020
"Not every head of design is the right leader for every phase of organizational maturity."
John DevanneyThe Design Management Office
November 6, 2017
"Most product managers are wide, most UX and engineers are deep — that’s just the nature of the roles."
Rich MironovHow Can Product Managers and UXers Help Each Other (and Why are Product Folks so Annoying Sometimes)?
December 6, 2022
"Legacy applications linger because changing them is risk-ridden and a major undertaking."
Malini RaoLessons Learned from a 4-year Product Re-platforming Journey
June 9, 2021
"Vanity metrics paint a nice picture, but they don’t give you the full story or context behind the numbers."
Iulia CornigeanuQuantQual Book Club: Small Data
March 8, 2024
"Choose plain, everyday words over jargon to meet your audience where they are."
Bruce GillespieLearning from journalism: Balancing impactful communication with compassionate storytelling
March 13, 2025
"The Quality Experience score helps executives make confident decisions by summarizing digital experience quality in a single number."
Rima Campbell Amrit S BhachuIncrease Productivity and Drive Business Impact
September 24, 2024
"Model companies are students in a classroom wanting good points—they’re happy to run external expert evals to improve."
Peter Van DijckHands-on AI #2: Understanding evals: LLM as a Judge
October 15, 2025
"Storytelling has the power to disrupt hegemonic narratives and open space for people to be authors of their own stories."
Bilan HashiThe Tension Between Story Collecting and Story Telling in Research
March 10, 2021
