Why Isn't Your UX Approach Going Viral?: A Mathematical Model
Summary
We'll take a look at how UX propagates within organizations using a viral model ( a modified SIR model to be more precise ). We'll look at such questions as: Does it simply need more time? Is the transmission rate/function the problem? Is part of the organization effectively "inoculated" against UX? and how, when and where to track progress While getting UX into an organization isn't as simple as solving a set of differential equations, we hope to show you that doing just that might be a useful step in getting insights into what might work and what might not.
Key Insights
-
•
Mathematics, including complex models, is becoming increasingly relevant in UX research and design.
-
•
Viral exponential growth can serve as a useful analogy for UX adoption spread within organizations.
-
•
The SIR epidemiological model maps well conceptually to UX adoption stages: susceptible, infected (adopted), and recovered (rejected).
-
•
Conceptual models are essential precursors and complements to mathematical models for meaningful insights.
-
•
Competing variants of UX approaches within organizations act like competing virus strains affecting adoption rates.
-
•
Certain groups within organizations may act as resistant or 'vaccinated' against new UX methods.
-
•
Some UX practices become endemic—persisting at stable levels rather than disappearing over time.
-
•
Defining explicit operational metrics is crucial to connect conceptual UX models with quantifiable mathematical models.
-
•
Mathematical models can inspire new research questions and ways of measuring UX adoption beyond traditional methods.
-
•
Models always have limitations, but even imperfect math models can yield valuable new perspectives.
Notable Quotes
"More math is coming our way into research into UX."
"Math by itself can be misleading and full of biases, but combined with humanities research, it can be very powerful."
"The story of the Indian king and grains of rice perfectly illustrates exponential growth."
"A model is a simplified representation of a system, whether in math or UX."
"Personas and journeys are all models we use in UX to manage complexity."
"The SIR model is simple but can be applied beyond viruses—to information spread, finance, and UX adoption."
"All models are wrong, but some are useful."
"There are competing variants in UX adoption like competing virus strains that can slow down change."
"You don’t need to be an expert in math to start making connections between math and UX."
"Math models don’t just provide numerical precision, they can be inspirational for thinking about UX spread."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"In Western modernity, if something is not an object, it is not real research or real knowledge."
Victor UdoewaBeyond Methods and Diversity: The Roots of Inclusion
March 26, 2024
"Features eventually become barnacles that are impossible to scrape off the boat."
Bill ScottLean Engineering: Engineering for Learning and Experimentation in the Enterprise
May 14, 2015
"It's not the demographics or names that should drive personas, but what people are really trying to do."
Lija HoganContexts of Use: A Framework for Connection
December 9, 2021
"Our Jira integration will be two-way so you can link design activities to epics, user stories, or tasks."
Aurobinda Pradhan Shashank DeshpandeIntroduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts
September 9, 2022
"There's no such thing as over-communication when you're distributed; silence breeds assumptions."
Jilanna WilsonDistributed DesignOps Management
February 26, 2019
"Models are stateless; they have no memory and forget everything after each response."
Peter Van DijckBuilding impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 3: Understand AI architectures: RAG, Agents, Oh My!
July 30, 2025
"There’s a lot of potential in UX research to go beyond product and influence strategy and C-suite decision making."
Nicole Aleong Michaela Mora Prayag Narula Brianna SylverWhat UX research can learn from other research practices [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
September 14, 2023
"The gap between what the output says and what the intention was is what we're going to call the reasoning gap."
Beth ChappellLeading through ambiguity: Supporting a design team relearning their craft
June 9, 2026
"Where in your design process is your biggest opportunity for AI adoption?"
Llewyn PaineDay 1 Using AI in UX with Impact
June 10, 2025
