Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Discussion

Gold
Wednesday, May 13, 2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Share the love for this talk
Discussion
Speakers: David Cronin , Uday Gajendar , Peter Morville and Kendra Shimmell
Link:

Summary

In this talk, the panelists explore how to identify critical inflection points in product development marked by growing complexity and user confusion, as highlighted by the consultant who often joins after chaos has emerged. Uday emphasizes the importance of aligning the highest representatives from marketing, engineering, and UX teams using the three-in-the-box model, supplemented by a wild card from orthogonal domains to spark innovation. Dave shares his traditional, people-first approach to understanding complex domains by deeply engaging with long-tenured subject matter experts. He details how his team manages their design system through enterprise agile practices, prioritizing impactful features and balancing stakeholder needs. Dave also addresses challenges like superficial adoption of design frameworks (IIDX washing) and stresses that their team invests more effort in facilitating workshops and teaching proper use of the system than just maintaining it, underscoring the synergy between conversations and prototyping tools for innovation.

Key Insights

  • Inflection points often become evident when users display confusion during usability testing, even with familiar tools.

  • Hiring an external consultant usually happens after an inflection point has caused chaos and complexity.

  • The three-in-the-box model—marketing, engineering, and UX leaders—is crucial for aligning diverse opinions around a common goal.

  • Introducing a ‘wild card’ from an orthogonal domain can spark innovative thinking in product teams.

  • Deep domain understanding comes from engaging with end users and long-tenured subject matter experts rather than relying solely on system mapping.

  • Design systems should be treated like living software products with backlogs, QA, and prioritized feature requests.

  • ‘IIDX washing’ occurs when teams superficially use a design framework to claim UX improvements without real change, which requires both confrontation and letting user adoption reveal the truth.

  • More effort is often spent teaching people how to use design systems effectively than on maintaining the systems themselves.

  • Combining creative workshops with prototyping tools accelerates feedback cycles and innovation.

  • In large ecosystems with many developers, contextual understanding is key to selecting the appropriate design components or 'LEGOs'.

Notable Quotes

"One sign of evidence that you've passed an inflection point is when you hire me as a consultant."

"When I see users saying, oh my goodness, I didn’t know it did that, that’s a clear sign of too much complexity."

"The three-in-the-box model means having marketing, engineering, and UX leaders working collaboratively."

"I always like to try to introduce a wild card from a slightly orthogonal field to spark the thinking."

"I start by going and talking to the people, the end users, and the subject matter experts who have been working in the field for decades."

"We treat the design system like a software product with a backlog, QA, and a product owner prioritizing feature requests."

"IIDX washing is when people replicate button by button and checkbox by checkbox, then claim better UX."

"Usually, the users not adopting the product alerts the organization that deeper issues exist beyond UI."

"We’ve put much more effort into workshop facilitation and teaching how to use the space effectively than on the design system itself."

"Creative conversations combined with material for quick prototyping let you get fast feedback on messy whiteboard ideas."

Ask the Rosenbot
Iram Shah
Closing Keynote: The View from the Top
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Robert Schwartz
We're Here for the Humans
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Mariah Hay
Ethics in Tech Education: Designing to Provide Opportunity for All
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Kristin Skinner
Group Activity: A Deep Dive Into Value and Outcomes
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Lisanne Norman
Why I Left Research
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Kit Unger
Theme 1 Intro
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Andy Polaine
What is the role of service design in product-led organizations?
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Luke Roberts
Panel Discussion
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Sean Fitzell
Craft of User Research: Building Out Jobs to be Done Maps
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Nova Wehman-Brown
We've Never Done This Before
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Eduardo Ortiz
Day 3 Theme Panel
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Zariah Cameron
Streamlining an Inclusive Design Practice
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Peter Merholz
Design at Scale is People!
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Ari Zelmanow
Dark Side of Democratization
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Sarah Brooks
Fireside chat with Sarah Brooks and Jen Pahlka
2021 • Civic Design Community
Dr. Jamika D. Burge
How UX researchers can partner with (and not be replaced by) AI [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community

More Videos

Jon White

"No more than five key insights — any more and teams start going off in different directions."

Jon White Erin May

Unsticking Research for Better Information Flow

March 11, 2026

Luz Bratcher

"More is not the same as growth and more is not the same as enough."

Luz Bratcher

This Is a Talk for Tired People

June 10, 2022

Ignacio Martinez

"We built a career path to make evaluations as fair and consistent as possible across roles."

Ignacio Martinez

Fair and Effective Designer Evaluation

September 25, 2024

Bria Alexander

"Design ops is not execution or tactical, it’s a leadership role that brings design thinking to the whole organization - Patrizia."

Bria Alexander Patrizia Bertini Peter Boersma Jon Fukuda Dave Malouf Theresa Slate Changying (Z) Zheng

Charting the future of DesignOps: A community workshop

April 18, 2024

Michael Weir

"Using a mixture of behavioral science, analytics, and experiments helps prioritize changes that truly move KPIs."

Michael Weir

Mixed Methods and Behavioural Science

May 26, 2023

Sam Proulx

"The four Cs—consistency, convenience, confidence, and customizability—are not just good for accessibility, they make a great experience for everyone."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

October 3, 2023

Alla Weinberg

"People have a biological need for certainty, but also a need for variety—not too much of either."

Alla Weinberg

People Are Sick of Change: Psychological Safety is the Cure

July 20, 2023

Amy Paris

"Change in government moves slowly, but we can pilot and iterate to serve evolving needs more quickly."

Amy Paris Danielle Thierry

Delivering Equity: Government Services for All Ages, Languages, Sexual Orientations, and Gender Identities

December 9, 2021

Francesca Barrientos, PhD

"During the pandemic, we learned to have awkward and uncomfortable conversations about people’s realities."

Francesca Barrientos, PhD

You Need Your Own Definition of Design Maturity

June 8, 2022