Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Discussion
Gold
Wednesday, May 13, 2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Share the love for this talk
Discussion
Speakers: David Cronin , Uday Gajendar , Peter Morville and Kendra Shimmell
Link:

Summary

In this talk, the panelists explore how to identify critical inflection points in product development marked by growing complexity and user confusion, as highlighted by the consultant who often joins after chaos has emerged. Uday emphasizes the importance of aligning the highest representatives from marketing, engineering, and UX teams using the three-in-the-box model, supplemented by a wild card from orthogonal domains to spark innovation. Dave shares his traditional, people-first approach to understanding complex domains by deeply engaging with long-tenured subject matter experts. He details how his team manages their design system through enterprise agile practices, prioritizing impactful features and balancing stakeholder needs. Dave also addresses challenges like superficial adoption of design frameworks (IIDX washing) and stresses that their team invests more effort in facilitating workshops and teaching proper use of the system than just maintaining it, underscoring the synergy between conversations and prototyping tools for innovation.

Key Insights

  • Inflection points often become evident when users display confusion during usability testing, even with familiar tools.

  • Hiring an external consultant usually happens after an inflection point has caused chaos and complexity.

  • The three-in-the-box model—marketing, engineering, and UX leaders—is crucial for aligning diverse opinions around a common goal.

  • Introducing a ‘wild card’ from an orthogonal domain can spark innovative thinking in product teams.

  • Deep domain understanding comes from engaging with end users and long-tenured subject matter experts rather than relying solely on system mapping.

  • Design systems should be treated like living software products with backlogs, QA, and prioritized feature requests.

  • ‘IIDX washing’ occurs when teams superficially use a design framework to claim UX improvements without real change, which requires both confrontation and letting user adoption reveal the truth.

  • More effort is often spent teaching people how to use design systems effectively than on maintaining the systems themselves.

  • Combining creative workshops with prototyping tools accelerates feedback cycles and innovation.

  • In large ecosystems with many developers, contextual understanding is key to selecting the appropriate design components or 'LEGOs'.

Notable Quotes

"One sign of evidence that you've passed an inflection point is when you hire me as a consultant."

"When I see users saying, oh my goodness, I didn’t know it did that, that’s a clear sign of too much complexity."

"The three-in-the-box model means having marketing, engineering, and UX leaders working collaboratively."

"I always like to try to introduce a wild card from a slightly orthogonal field to spark the thinking."

"I start by going and talking to the people, the end users, and the subject matter experts who have been working in the field for decades."

"We treat the design system like a software product with a backlog, QA, and a product owner prioritizing feature requests."

"IIDX washing is when people replicate button by button and checkbox by checkbox, then claim better UX."

"Usually, the users not adopting the product alerts the organization that deeper issues exist beyond UI."

"We’ve put much more effort into workshop facilitation and teaching how to use the space effectively than on the design system itself."

"Creative conversations combined with material for quick prototyping let you get fast feedback on messy whiteboard ideas."

Jen Crim
Culture, DIBS & Recruiting
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Robin Beers
Research as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Gillian Salerno-Rebic
Redefining Speed and Scale: How Accenture’s GrowthOS Uses AI-Simulated Insights to Reduce Risk and Accelerate Innovation
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Yunyan Li
UX Best Practices
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Jacqui Frey
Flow and Superfluidity for Design Orgs
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Brenna Fallon
Learning Over Outcomes
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
James Lang
If you can design an app, you can design a community
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Zen Ren
Taking Inspiration from Instructional Design for Research
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Etienne Fang
Power of Insights: Why sharing is better than silos with Uber’s Insights Platform
2019 • Advancing Research Community
Smitha Papolu
Theme 3 Discussion
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Brendan Jarvis
Framing Tomorrow by Questioning Today
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Dan Ward
Failure Friday #1 with Dan Ward
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Sean Dolan
A Practical Look at Creating More Usable Enterprise Customer Journeys
2019 • Enterprise Community
Frances Yllana
D.E.A.R.R. Diaries (Discipline, Experience, Architecture, Reflection + Revolution)
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
Coffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Séamus Byrne
Aligning Teams with Choreography
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold

More Videos

Ned Dwyer

"At Brex, design ops supports a broad range of design disciplines and also partners with engineers and marketers."

Ned Dwyer Emily Stewart James Wallis

The Intersection of Design and ResearchOps

September 24, 2024

Wyatt Hayman

"Participants are paid based on purchasing power parity — $400 USD equivalent spread over six months for active participation."

Wyatt Hayman

Global Research Panels

August 8, 2020

Joshua Noble

"Difference-in-differences lets you study treatment effects in groups that start in very different places by looking at trends."

Joshua Noble

Casual Inference

October 6, 2023

Uday Gajendar

"We started with an excursion into systems thinking, then dived deep into IA and knowledge management."

Uday Gajendar

Theme Four Intro

June 6, 2023

Jess Greco

"Without attribution you can’t get funding, and if it’s not funded, it’s not a priority."

Jess Greco

Creating a Basis for Change: Scaling Design Maturity

June 8, 2022

Victor Udoewa

"Transformation research is a transformative force."

Victor Udoewa

Theme One Intro

March 27, 2023

Billy Carlson

"Designing for edge cases can lead to solutions everyone wants to use because they’re more comfortable and inclusive."

Billy Carlson

Ideation tips for Product Managers

December 6, 2022

Cassini Nazir

"Designing and researching wisdom is a dialogue, not a monologue."

Cassini Nazir Meah Lin

The Dangers of Empathy: Toward More Responsible Design Research

March 27, 2023

Veevi Rosenstein

"Since everyone was doing their own research, the quality of the research being done was pretty inconsistent."

Veevi Rosenstein

Building for Scale: Creating the Zendesk UX Research Practice

January 8, 2024