Rosenverse
Discussion

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Discussion

Gold
Wednesday, May 13, 2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Share the love for this talk
Discussion
Speakers: David Cronin , Uday Gajendar , Peter Morville and Kendra Shimmell
Link:

Summary

In this talk, the panelists explore how to identify critical inflection points in product development marked by growing complexity and user confusion, as highlighted by the consultant who often joins after chaos has emerged. Uday emphasizes the importance of aligning the highest representatives from marketing, engineering, and UX teams using the three-in-the-box model, supplemented by a wild card from orthogonal domains to spark innovation. Dave shares his traditional, people-first approach to understanding complex domains by deeply engaging with long-tenured subject matter experts. He details how his team manages their design system through enterprise agile practices, prioritizing impactful features and balancing stakeholder needs. Dave also addresses challenges like superficial adoption of design frameworks (IIDX washing) and stresses that their team invests more effort in facilitating workshops and teaching proper use of the system than just maintaining it, underscoring the synergy between conversations and prototyping tools for innovation.

Key Insights

  • Inflection points often become evident when users display confusion during usability testing, even with familiar tools.

  • Hiring an external consultant usually happens after an inflection point has caused chaos and complexity.

  • The three-in-the-box model—marketing, engineering, and UX leaders—is crucial for aligning diverse opinions around a common goal.

  • Introducing a ‘wild card’ from an orthogonal domain can spark innovative thinking in product teams.

  • Deep domain understanding comes from engaging with end users and long-tenured subject matter experts rather than relying solely on system mapping.

  • Design systems should be treated like living software products with backlogs, QA, and prioritized feature requests.

  • ‘IIDX washing’ occurs when teams superficially use a design framework to claim UX improvements without real change, which requires both confrontation and letting user adoption reveal the truth.

  • More effort is often spent teaching people how to use design systems effectively than on maintaining the systems themselves.

  • Combining creative workshops with prototyping tools accelerates feedback cycles and innovation.

  • In large ecosystems with many developers, contextual understanding is key to selecting the appropriate design components or 'LEGOs'.

Notable Quotes

"One sign of evidence that you've passed an inflection point is when you hire me as a consultant."

"When I see users saying, oh my goodness, I didn’t know it did that, that’s a clear sign of too much complexity."

"The three-in-the-box model means having marketing, engineering, and UX leaders working collaboratively."

"I always like to try to introduce a wild card from a slightly orthogonal field to spark the thinking."

"I start by going and talking to the people, the end users, and the subject matter experts who have been working in the field for decades."

"We treat the design system like a software product with a backlog, QA, and a product owner prioritizing feature requests."

"IIDX washing is when people replicate button by button and checkbox by checkbox, then claim better UX."

"Usually, the users not adopting the product alerts the organization that deeper issues exist beyond UI."

"We’ve put much more effort into workshop facilitation and teaching how to use the space effectively than on the design system itself."

"Creative conversations combined with material for quick prototyping let you get fast feedback on messy whiteboard ideas."

Ask the Rosenbot
Victor Udoewa
Beyond Methods and Diversity: The Roots of Inclusion
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi
Contextuality problem: Exploring the Benefits of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Yulya Besplemennova
[Demo] Stress-testing GenAI in user research synthesis
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Cennydd Bowles
Day 1 Panel
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Jack Moffett
UX Metrics That Matter and The Future of our Design at Scale Conference: A Community Conversation
2022 • Enterprise Community
Joanna Vodopivec
One Research Team for All - Influence Without Authority
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Sam Ladner
How Research Can Drive Strategic Foresight
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Brenna Fallon
Learning Over Outcomes
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Bud Caddell
DesignOps Community Sensing Session
2021 • DesignOps Community
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
AI: Passionate defenses and reasoned critique [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Peter Merholz
The 2025 State of UX/Design Organizational Health
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Farid Sabitov
Theme Four Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Deanna Smith
Leading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Elena Naids
The Power of Difficult Conversations: A Case Study on How We Introduced Design Ops in the Federal Government Space
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Doug Powell
Closing Keynote: Design at Scale
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Leading through the long tail of trauma
2022 • Enterprise Community

More Videos

Bria Alexander

"Designers must do the internal work of self-awareness and reflection before shifting power to communities."

Bria Alexander Ariel Kennan Charlotte Lee Sarah Brooks Emily Lessard Gordon Ross Joanne Dong

Reflect and Chart Forward

December 10, 2021

Anil Dash

"Big AI easily violates every part of the power framework: no consent, no consultation, no control."

Anil Dash

Designing with power in the age of AI

June 10, 2026

Jilanna Wilson

"Emojis and GIFs have become effective tools for remote teams to add expression and prevent miscommunication."

Jilanna Wilson

Distributed Design Operations Management

October 23, 2019

Charles Lee

"Updating and adopting design system components is company time, so a slower release schedule helps teams keep up."

Charles Lee Jennie Yip

Building a New Home for the Atlassian Design System

October 22, 2020

Justin Entzminger

"Post-its give everyone an equal playing field, preventing dominant voices from overshadowing others in community conversations."

Justin Entzminger Terrance Smith Tracy M. Colunga Mai-Ling Garcia

Risk and Reward: How to Diversify the Field of Civic Innovators and Designers

November 17, 2022

Dave Gray

"If you’re having more conversation about what the actual question means than answering it, that’s a problem with the canvas we need to fix."

Dave Gray

Group Activity: Making Sense of DesignOps

November 7, 2017

Daniel Gloyd

"I spent the whole car ride home thinking, what just happened? — after singing together at a Shaker conference."

Daniel Gloyd

Designing Warmth

February 26, 2025

Maish Nichani

"The bond raising method locked everyone in a room to collectively review 1000 pages in three months, bridging silos quickly."

Maish Nichani

Sparking a Service Excellence Mindset at a Government Agency

December 9, 2021

Marisa Bernstein

"Participant experience is everything and it starts with building trust."

Marisa Bernstein

It Takes GRIT: Lessons from the Small, but Mighty World of Civic Usability Testing

December 9, 2021