Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Discussion
Gold
Wednesday, May 13, 2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Share the love for this talk
Discussion
Speakers: David Cronin , Uday Gajendar , Peter Morville and Kendra Shimmell
Link:

Summary

In this talk, the panelists explore how to identify critical inflection points in product development marked by growing complexity and user confusion, as highlighted by the consultant who often joins after chaos has emerged. Uday emphasizes the importance of aligning the highest representatives from marketing, engineering, and UX teams using the three-in-the-box model, supplemented by a wild card from orthogonal domains to spark innovation. Dave shares his traditional, people-first approach to understanding complex domains by deeply engaging with long-tenured subject matter experts. He details how his team manages their design system through enterprise agile practices, prioritizing impactful features and balancing stakeholder needs. Dave also addresses challenges like superficial adoption of design frameworks (IIDX washing) and stresses that their team invests more effort in facilitating workshops and teaching proper use of the system than just maintaining it, underscoring the synergy between conversations and prototyping tools for innovation.

Key Insights

  • Inflection points often become evident when users display confusion during usability testing, even with familiar tools.

  • Hiring an external consultant usually happens after an inflection point has caused chaos and complexity.

  • The three-in-the-box model—marketing, engineering, and UX leaders—is crucial for aligning diverse opinions around a common goal.

  • Introducing a ‘wild card’ from an orthogonal domain can spark innovative thinking in product teams.

  • Deep domain understanding comes from engaging with end users and long-tenured subject matter experts rather than relying solely on system mapping.

  • Design systems should be treated like living software products with backlogs, QA, and prioritized feature requests.

  • ‘IIDX washing’ occurs when teams superficially use a design framework to claim UX improvements without real change, which requires both confrontation and letting user adoption reveal the truth.

  • More effort is often spent teaching people how to use design systems effectively than on maintaining the systems themselves.

  • Combining creative workshops with prototyping tools accelerates feedback cycles and innovation.

  • In large ecosystems with many developers, contextual understanding is key to selecting the appropriate design components or 'LEGOs'.

Notable Quotes

"One sign of evidence that you've passed an inflection point is when you hire me as a consultant."

"When I see users saying, oh my goodness, I didn’t know it did that, that’s a clear sign of too much complexity."

"The three-in-the-box model means having marketing, engineering, and UX leaders working collaboratively."

"I always like to try to introduce a wild card from a slightly orthogonal field to spark the thinking."

"I start by going and talking to the people, the end users, and the subject matter experts who have been working in the field for decades."

"We treat the design system like a software product with a backlog, QA, and a product owner prioritizing feature requests."

"IIDX washing is when people replicate button by button and checkbox by checkbox, then claim better UX."

"Usually, the users not adopting the product alerts the organization that deeper issues exist beyond UI."

"We’ve put much more effort into workshop facilitation and teaching how to use the space effectively than on the design system itself."

"Creative conversations combined with material for quick prototyping let you get fast feedback on messy whiteboard ideas."

Ask the Rosenbot
Jemma Ahmed
Convergent Research Techniques in Customer Journey Mapping
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Lija Hogan
Doing more with more: Lessons from the Front Lines of Democratization
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Tiffany Cheng
Designing in a Pandemic: Integrating Speed and Rigor
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
David Cronin
The GE Design System and Thoughts about Craft at Scale
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Sofia Quintero
Beyond Tools: The Messy Business of Implementing Research Repositories
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Shanti Mathew
Civic Design at Scale: Introducing the Public Policy Layer Cake
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Meghan Hellstern
The Next 100 Years of Civic Design: How Might We Better Rise to Meet the Challenges of Today and Tomorrow?
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Patrizia Bertini
DesignOps + KPIs = Measure your Impact!
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Aletheia Delivre
New Shapes and Emerging Identities for Design Ops
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Suzan Bednarz
AccessibilityOps for All
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Josh Clark
Sentient Design: New Postures for AI-Mediated Experiences (2nd of 3 seminars)
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Isaac Heyveld
Expand DesignOps Leadership as a Chief of Staff
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Amanda Kaleta-Kott
The Joys and Dilemmas of Conducting UX Research with Older Adults
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Séamus Byrne
Aligning Teams with Choreography
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Sofía Delsordo
Public Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Yulya Besplemennova
[Demo] Stress-testing GenAI in user research synthesis
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold

More Videos

Angelos Arnis

"Many companies view design operations as a nice to have, rather than essential, making these roles prime targets in layoffs."

Angelos Arnis

Navigating the Rapid Shifts in Tech's Turbulent Terrain

October 2, 2023

Dr. Jamika D. Burge

"It takes an experienced researcher to be able to wrangle AI prompts to have any chance of getting good work."

Dr. Jamika D. Burge Nick Fine Alexandra Jayeun Lee Greg Nudelman Bo Wang

How UX researchers can partner with (and not be replaced by) AI [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]

August 31, 2023

Kristin Wisnewski

"Before, we never really looked holistically at decades of UX data—now we use it to be proactive and avoid duplicative studies."

Kristin Wisnewski

Measuring What Matters

October 23, 2019

Jake Burghardt

"Activating insights multiple times can be necessary before teams truly internalize and act on them."

Jake Burghardt

Stop wasting research: Create new value with insight summaries

July 9, 2025

Louis Rosenfeld

"It’s better to err on the side of kindness and emotional support toward colleagues who might be struggling."

Louis Rosenfeld

Welcome / Housekeeping

June 7, 2023

Sam Proulx

"Consistency is so important that sometimes even consistency in failure works if it means I only have to learn the workaround once."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

June 7, 2023

Hugh Dubberly

"You don’t think of raising a child or teaching a student as solving a problem, it’s an ongoing process—and so is design today."

Hugh Dubberly

Problems with Problems: Reconsidering the Frame of Designing as Problem-Solving

June 19, 2019

Bria Alexander

"Co-creating operating models with our teams helps us remain resilient even when things get a little hairy and squirrely."

Bria Alexander

Theme 1 Intro

September 23, 2024

Greg Petroff

"The code starts to follow the outcomes and might even start to write itself at some level."

Greg Petroff

Software as Material—A Redux

June 6, 2023