Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Why AI projects fail (and what we can do about it)
Wednesday, May 14, 2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
Why AI projects fail (and what we can do about it)
Speakers: Dan Saffer
Link:

Summary

Most AI projects fail. Somewhere between 50-90% of them, which is double the rate of more traditional tech projects. This Rosenverse Session will draw on years of Carnegie Mellon HCII research to dive into the five traps that AI projects can fall into, and then talk about what designers and project managers can do to avoid those traps. Including one startling finding: user-centered design alone isn’t enough.

Key Insights

  • Most AI projects fail due to choosing the wrong problems rather than poor execution.

  • The AI innovation gap occurs because data scientists focus on technically hard but low-value problems.

  • User-centered design alone often identifies problems unsuitable for AI solutions.

  • AI works best for low-risk, moderate accuracy (~90%), narrow tasks like spam filtering or smart text suggestions.

  • Executives push AI fast to avoid falling behind, risking deployments without clear user or business value.

  • Consequences scanning is a vital method to detect and mitigate ethical risks before AI product launch.

  • Matchmaking AI capabilities with real user needs and organizational goals increases project success.

  • Agents add new AI capabilities to sense, think, and act, requiring adapted design processes.

  • AI lacks context, aesthetic taste, and common sense—designers must provide these to create effective AI products.

  • There is currently little corporate or legal accountability for AI ethics; responsibility largely falls to product teams.

Notable Quotes

"Welcome to the AI party, we've got 10 years of research to share."

"Executives said it's better to go fast and fail than to go slow and succeed."

"AI can be magical, but it's also just not that smart."

"Don Norman was named the top accomplished woman in UX by AI, even though Don is a man."

"Companies hunt for AI innovation in technically challenging areas instead of simpler, more valuable places."

"Most AI fails because projects require near perfect accuracy, which AI can't reliably deliver."

"The traditional user-centered design process doesn't work well for AI problems."

"Matchmaking connects AI capabilities to user needs so you find the low hanging fruit projects."

"AI struggles with context, taste, and common sense, and designers bring that to the table."

"Consequences scanning helps detect unintended harms and risks before launching AI features."

Ask the Rosenbot
Amanda Kaleta-Kott
The Joys and Dilemmas of Conducting UX Research with Older Adults
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Jane Davis
Strategic Shifts and Innovations in User Research: Navigating Challenges and Opportunities
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Aletheia Delivre
New Shapes and Emerging Identities for Design Ops
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Conference
Louis Rosenfeld
Coffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Robert Schwartz
We're Here for the Humans
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Maggie Dieringer
Creating Consistency Through Constant Change
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Stefanie Owens
Optimizing for Outcomes: Transformation Design in Systems at Scale
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Frances Yllana
D.E.A.R.R. Diaries (Discipline, Experience, Architecture, Reflection + Revolution)
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Billy Carlson
Pro-level UI Tips for Beginners
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi
Contextuality problem: Exploring the Benefits of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Susan Weinschenk
Evaluating the Maturity of UX in Your Organization
2020 • Enterprise Community
Steve Portigal
Discussion
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Marisa Bernstein
It Takes GRIT: Lessons from the Small, but Mighty World of Civic Usability Testing
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Sara Conklin
A UXer’s 12-Month Journey from Climate Concern to Climate Credibility
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Tony Turner
Capturing Deep Insights
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Ed Mullen
Designing the Unseen: Enabling Institutions to Build Public Trust
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold

More Videos

Sam Proulx

"If you’re doing research with people with disabilities, consider using the Accessible Usability Scale to get more accurate insights."

Sam Proulx

SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population

December 9, 2021

Michael Land

"You don’t want so much governance that people can’t be creative, but you need just enough to help their process."

Michael Land

Establishing Design Operations in Government

February 18, 2021

Shipra Kayan

"We had to push through analysis paralysis and trust our guts as customer-facing teams that knew the business."

Shipra Kayan

How we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up

September 30, 2021

Ian Swinson

"Communication matters—sending an email to an executive with spelling mistakes can ruin your respect."

Ian Swinson

Designing and Driving UX Careers

June 8, 2016

Isaac Heyveld

"We went from a team of 80 to 170 overnight, and that was a wide open cheeks flushed moment for me."

Isaac Heyveld

Expand DesignOps Leadership as a Chief of Staff

September 8, 2022

Amy Evans

"What if product and business actually manage designs and deliver digital communications?"

Amy Evans

How to Create Change

September 25, 2024

Kate Koch

"Super strength is the resilience and endurance to partner and drive strategic impact backed by customer obsession."

Kate Koch Prateek Kalli

Flex Your Super Powers: When a Design Ops Team Scales to Power CX

September 30, 2021

Dave Gray

"People don’t share their beliefs; you have to search for and understand them to get true buy-in."

Dave Gray

Liminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations

May 14, 2015

Matt Duignan

"The challenge is whether your organization has the energy to overcome cultural and technical barriers driving researchers back to disposable knowledge."

Matt Duignan

Atomizing Research: Trend or Trap

March 30, 2020