Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
Most AI projects fail. Somewhere between 50-90% of them, which is double the rate of more traditional tech projects. This Rosenverse Session will draw on years of Carnegie Mellon HCII research to dive into the five traps that AI projects can fall into, and then talk about what designers and project managers can do to avoid those traps. Including one startling finding: user-centered design alone isn’t enough.
Key Insights
-
•
Most AI projects fail due to choosing the wrong problems rather than poor execution.
-
•
The AI innovation gap occurs because data scientists focus on technically hard but low-value problems.
-
•
User-centered design alone often identifies problems unsuitable for AI solutions.
-
•
AI works best for low-risk, moderate accuracy (~90%), narrow tasks like spam filtering or smart text suggestions.
-
•
Executives push AI fast to avoid falling behind, risking deployments without clear user or business value.
-
•
Consequences scanning is a vital method to detect and mitigate ethical risks before AI product launch.
-
•
Matchmaking AI capabilities with real user needs and organizational goals increases project success.
-
•
Agents add new AI capabilities to sense, think, and act, requiring adapted design processes.
-
•
AI lacks context, aesthetic taste, and common sense—designers must provide these to create effective AI products.
-
•
There is currently little corporate or legal accountability for AI ethics; responsibility largely falls to product teams.
Notable Quotes
"Welcome to the AI party, we've got 10 years of research to share."
"Executives said it's better to go fast and fail than to go slow and succeed."
"AI can be magical, but it's also just not that smart."
"Don Norman was named the top accomplished woman in UX by AI, even though Don is a man."
"Companies hunt for AI innovation in technically challenging areas instead of simpler, more valuable places."
"Most AI fails because projects require near perfect accuracy, which AI can't reliably deliver."
"The traditional user-centered design process doesn't work well for AI problems."
"Matchmaking connects AI capabilities to user needs so you find the low hanging fruit projects."
"AI struggles with context, taste, and common sense, and designers bring that to the table."
"Consequences scanning helps detect unintended harms and risks before launching AI features."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We organize our work around our life, instead of our life around our work."
Ana FerreiraDesigning Distributed: Leading Doist’s Fully Remote Design Team in Six Countries
January 8, 2024
"No matter how much we simplify, research isn’t for everyone and that’s perfectly fine."
Roy Opata OlendeHow Zapier Uses ‘All Hands Research’ to Increase Exposure to Users
August 6, 2020
"Designers focus on shipping and don’t have bandwidth for documenting learnings or synthesizing knowledge across products."
Kit Unger Jackie Ho Veevi Rosenstein Vasileios XanthopoulosTheme 2: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"To influence others, you must be willing to be influenced and change your mind to align with organizational goals."
Abbey Smalley Sylas SouzaScaling UX Past the Size of Your Team
January 8, 2024
"Elizabeth Churchill framed AI as a pedal assist system, helping us go further and faster but sometimes needing to dial it back."
Helen ArmstrongAugment the Human. Interrogate the System.
June 7, 2023
"Film is not just a way to capture information, it’s a way to think about information."
Bas Raijmakers, PhD (RCA) Charley Scull Prabhas PokharelWhat Design Research can Learn from Documentary Filmmaking
March 11, 2022
"Giving parents something meaningful to do during sessions helps keep them engaged and supportive."
Mila Kuznetsova Lucy DentonHow Lessons Learned from Our Youngest Users Can Help Us Evolve our Practices
March 9, 2022
"I tried different prompts and roles, but they didn’t fundamentally improve ChatGPT’s ability to generate meaningful frameworks."
Weidan LiQualitative synthesis with ChatGPT: Better or worse than human intelligence?
June 4, 2024
"It’s best thought of as a service and enabling role where you orchestrate people and bring out their best collectively."
Christian CrumlishAMA with Christian Crumlish, author of Product Management for UX People
March 24, 2022
