Summary
Research holds great potential to both heal and harm—both ourselves and the communities we engage with. This session will help you to understand these impacts, and learn best practices to reduce harm and foster healing ethically and responsibly.
Key Insights
-
•
Research is never neutral; it is embedded within power structures and influences who is seen and heard.
-
•
Design research lacks formal ethical guardrails, unlike professions like social work or medicine, creating vulnerabilities.
-
•
The culture of urgency and speed in research often leads to extractive, performative practices that minimize harm.
-
•
Moral injury in research arises from systemic ethical failure, creating profound conflicts between values and work demands.
-
•
Minimizing or sanitizing harm enables institutions to avoid accountability while perpetuating cycles of ethical breaches.
-
•
Researchers can reclaim agency by setting personal ethical boundaries, advocating for care, and building supportive communities.
-
•
The RK Institute’s two loops model illustrates how old unethical research systems decline while trauma-informed approaches emerge.
-
•
Trauma-responsive research centers five principles: safety, transparency, co-creation, empowerment, and hope.
-
•
Slowing down research is a radical form of resistance prioritizing dignity, trust, and sustainability over speed.
-
•
Accountability and ethical frameworks must be integrated into organizational cultures, not left to individual researchers.
Notable Quotes
"You can't be neutral on a moving train."
"In design, it's the BYOE model—bring your own ethics."
"Moral injury is not just about witnessing harm; it's the inner knowing that you might also be complicit in producing it."
"Minimizing harm protects institutions, not people."
"Slowing down is not inefficiency; it is a commitment to dignity and trust."
"Moving fast isn’t just breaking things, it’s actually breaking people."
"The pressure to produce insights quickly defines many organizations shaped by 'move fast and break things' culture."
"Discomfort should not be dismissed; it’s a signpost for necessary change."
"Research should prioritize participant and researcher well-being over institutional convenience."
"The power of a bold idea uttered publicly in defiance of dominant opinion cannot be easily measured."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"DesignOps needs to work more horizontally to bridge silos between product, marketing, engineering, and research."
Dave Malouf Patrizia Bertini Jon FukudaThe Past, Present, and Future of DesignOps: a 2-part DesignOps Community Call (Part 2)
April 28, 2022
"Sometimes researchers end interviews feeling like their head is going to burst from pressure and trauma."
Jane Reid Janice HannawaySelf-care in User Research
April 2, 2020
"You can use experience sampling data to select a small qualitative sample to dive deeper in interviews."
Amelia ColeData-Prompted Interviews
December 17, 2021
"We put high-fidelity designs in Mural so stakeholders unfamiliar with Figma can still comment and interact."
Erika FlowersIntroduction to MURAL for UX
June 11, 2021
"All session notes and resources will be available within the hour, so you can just relax and absorb the content."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
September 30, 2021
"Super speed means enabling rapid onboarding by centralizing and streamlining a previously disparate process."
Kate Koch Prateek KalliFlex Your Super Powers: When a Design Ops Team Scales to Power CX
September 30, 2021
"If something is not ready by the time the train leaves the station, then it catches the next train."
Jack MoffettSAFe or Sorry?
May 29, 2019
"Marital status mattered because some people buy cars for their spouses or kids, not just themselves."
Edgar Anzaldua MorenoUsing Research to Determine Unique Value Proposition
March 11, 2021
"We support Angular first because many early customers use it, but React and Blazor are on our roadmap."
George Abraham Stefan IvanovDesign Systems To-Go: Indigo.Design Overview and Exploring the Developer Workflow (Part 3)
October 1, 2021
