Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
The third in a series of discussions centered around Climate UX. To make an impact on the climate, many different audiences will need to understand and use climate science. But the science is complex and evolving rapidly. How might we best approach it as translators and facilitators? Through case studies and discussion you’ll learn how four designers are doing this today. Panelists: Ted Booth, HK Dunston, Andrew Otwell; Moderated by: Victor Lombardi
Key Insights
-
•
Climate UX involves translating highly complex and evolving scientific data into usable, understandable formats tailored to different audiences like journalists, scientists, and consumers.
-
•
Victor Lombardi’s Climate Shift Index uses real-time algorithms to model climate change attribution for weather events, making attribution science accessible for daily media use.
-
•
Scientists strongly prefer literal, detailed representations of data over metaphorical or simplified visuals, as abstraction can cause mistrust and suspicion.
-
•
Designing for scientists requires embracing their mental models—frequently based on Excel-like grids and ‘clunky’ graphs—instead of pushing novel visualizations.
-
•
Ted Booth’s startup uses ambient sensing (monitoring the environment rather than equipment directly) combined with AI to predict HVAC system efficiency and maintenance needs.
-
•
Invention in climate tech often involves creating new units of measure and visualization approaches, like degrees Fahrenheit per hour to represent HVAC performance.
-
•
HK emphasizes the role of culture, art, and storytelling alongside science to interpret and react to climate change, as science alone cannot guide human response.
-
•
Learning to design in scientific domains often requires humility, asking many questions, and grappling with unfamiliar foundational knowledge rather than relying on metaphor.
-
•
Science prioritizes avoiding false positives (identifying phenomena that don’t exist) over missing some phenomena, which influences how risk and catastrophe are communicated.
-
•
Designers can provide cultural cover or guardrails that enable scientists to communicate nuanced and complex findings to broader audiences effectively.
Notable Quotes
"The maps lose scientific accuracy but gain understanding by simplifying complex data into color keys that people interpret quickly."
"Scientists want to understand how things work at the bottom level of detail; they don’t want metaphors or abstractions that feel like black boxing."
"In science, it’s better to miss a phenomenon than to misidentify one that doesn’t really exist."
"Excel is the mental model of the scientific research world—a two-dimensional grid of literal data."
"Sometimes you just have to plant a flag and say this is what we can do, even if the math and boundaries are complicated."
"Climate is not operating in geologic time anymore—we face radical, rapid changes unlike past eras."
"For scientists, the cost of being wrong is very high, while designers iterate constantly, embracing failure as part of the process."
"Designers bring a unique cultural perspective to multidisciplinary scientific teams, helping interpret and communicate complex data."
"There is a romance and incredible creativity in data visualization, but sometimes simpler is better, letting the data speak for itself."
"Learning scientific domain knowledge requires humility—being willing to say ‘I don’t get it, can you explain differently?’ and asking dumb questions."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
















More Videos

"Do I find a way to make this conversation more about the software as scheduled or do I show Laura how to react to the unplanned?"
Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II
March 30, 2020

"Don’t force yourself into a job you know isn’t right just because you’re unemployed."
Corey Nelson Amy SanteeLayoffs
November 15, 2022

"Research is not as easy as putting on a shoe and just doing it; it requires careful consideration and alignment with imperatives."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022

"We’re often stuck on a hamster wheel of short-term metrics like daily or monthly active users that don’t capture long-term success."
Amy BucherHarnessing behavioral science to uncover deeper truths
March 12, 2025

"Friction isn’t just annoying; it’s a force that reshapes behavior and can slow or stop user flow."
David SternbergUncovering the hidden forces shaping user behavior
July 17, 2025

"More frequent change isn't always better; good communication and team pulse are key."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024

"Provocative prototypes provoke conversation and surface unspoken values."
Jennifer StricklandAdopting a "Design By" Method
December 9, 2021

"If adding a design program manager gives each designer back even one hour a day, you might make your entire team more efficient."
Rachel Posman John CalhounA Closer Look at Team Ops and Product Ops (Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin)
November 19, 2020

"Service designers connect the dots, which represent elements, teams, processes, policies, and customer needs that all must align."
Gina MendoliaTherapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
December 3, 2024