Key Insights

• •

  Research teams with limited experience often overemphasize scientific rigor, hindering learning compared to design teams.

• •

  Designers use a more flexible notion of rigor based on intuition, feelings, and real-time collaboration.

• •

  Stolterman’s concept of design rigor is better suited to the complexity of design research than strict scientific rigor.

• •

  Schön’s knowing-in-action highlights intuition and reflection as core to developing professional skill and rigor.

• •

  Reflection-in-action is a five-step process helping practitioners improve their intuition through surprise and experimentation.

• •

  Dewey emphasizes learning by doing and demonstrating, not just verbal instruction, as essential for effective skill transfer.

• •

  Yohael’s Three Rs framework (Recount, Relate, Reframe) structures reflection on intuition in research practice.

• •

  Pair research and 1:1 sessions incorporating demonstration and imitation improve learning and confidence in research teams.

• •

  The perceived discrepancy between research and design team performance was due more to learning practices than stakeholder bias.

• •

  Inclusive learning frameworks can reduce impostor syndrome and expand access to design research beyond traditional academic pedigrees.

Notable Quotes