Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI
Summary
We’re all aware of a big push to implement AI everywhere, including in the services that many of us are working on. It seems only fair to try to give the AI some good quality input in the hope of getting decent output from it. Or, being more pessimistic: we probably expect to get some level of errors from the AI, but what do we know about the error rates in what we’re putting into the AI? In this session, we will compare our ideas on identifying errors and measuring error rates, including thinking about errors in six ways: 1) Problems along the way 2) Wrong result 3) Unnecessary action 4) Delayed-impact problem 5) Non-uptake or over-uptake 6) Technology problem We’ll wrap up with “tips and next steps”: an opportunity to consider what we now need to find out or do differently.
Key Insights
-
•
Errors in data collection and user input are foundational issues that compromise AI and service outcomes.
-
•
Users often 'fudge' answers due to ambiguous questions, privacy concerns, or to achieve a desired outcome.
-
•
Non-uptake, where users abandon a form or process, is a major source of error but is rarely published or measured.
-
•
Mistakes can be categorized as problems along the way, wrong results, unnecessary actions, and delayed impact issues.
-
•
Multiple accounts creation often occurs due to users forgetting existing accounts, leading to data duplicates and service inefficiencies.
-
•
Measuring error rates is complex; different metrics (per person, per attempt, completion vs. start) yield different perspectives.
-
•
Elections provide a useful model for measuring data quality, using turnout, participation, and eligibility rates.
-
•
Data quality deteriorates over time due to changes like moving, name changes, loss of documents, or organizational restructuring.
-
•
AI initiatives can provide a compelling rationale and funding opportunity for improving longstanding data quality problems.
-
•
Frameworks like the UK Government Data Quality Framework help organizations systematically assess and address data issues.
Notable Quotes
"If we get garbage in, we get garbage out — this is true for AI as much as for surveys or forms."
"People can make all sorts of inventive mistakes on their forms that AI struggles to interpret."
"Sometimes a form forces you into a wrong answer by giving inappropriate options."
"I’ve seen people fudge their date of birth so their child can attend a summer camp they aren’t technically eligible for."
"A major error in many services is users creating multiple accounts because they can’t find or reuse existing ones."
"An error might not be immediate; data can be fine when collected but deteriorate over time and cause problems later."
"Completion rates (conversion rates) and dropout rates are simple metrics but often not tracked or shared."
"Organizations rarely know their error rates, which limits their ability to improve user experience or data accuracy."
"Linking data quality efforts to AI initiatives can help secure attention and budget for necessary improvements."
"Data quality involves accuracy, completeness, uniqueness, timeliness, and representativeness—not just error reduction."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If we don’t find our courage and take on the fight, our field dies."
Jemma AhmedResearch at an inflection point: Adapting to a new era of collaboration, equity, and innovation
March 11, 2025
"Michael became our farmer maintaining steady flow; Davis our forger bringing world-class UX; Dana our gardener cultivating quality work."
Briana ThomasThe Quiet Force: Uncovering Hidden Leadership in High-Impact Design Teams
September 24, 2024
"By summer, there had been zero cases of COVID on farms employing temporary foreign workers in BC."
Gordon Ross12 Months of COVID-19 Design and Digital Response with the British Columbia Government
December 8, 2021
"AI can generate insights, but it does not do them as well as a moderately trained human researcher."
Laura KleinHuman vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
March 11, 2026
"Designing a metric starts with the goals, not the metric itself."
Alberto FerreiraMaking it Count: Developing a custom digital metric framework that works
October 15, 2021
"Save all this content into a shareable playlist you can copy into your own learning management system."
Louis RosenfeldHow to use the Rosenbot
March 16, 2026
"AI tools generate convincing yet potentially misleading content at scale, eroding public trust."
Noah BondRedefining truth and inclusivity: Navigating data ownership and ethical research in the age of disinformation
March 11, 2025
"Next generation tools are being built not for specialists but for the broader population, like product managers and engineers."
James LangHopeful Futures for UX Research
January 30, 2026
"Legal was one of the most challenging stakeholders — I wish I’d built those relationships early."
Amy ParnessScaling Sustainability: Complementary strategies that drive long-term success
May 29, 2025
