Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
We’re all aware of a big push to implement AI everywhere, including in the services that many of us are working on. It seems only fair to try to give the AI some good quality input in the hope of getting decent output from it. Or, being more pessimistic: we probably expect to get some level of errors from the AI, but what do we know about the error rates in what we’re putting into the AI? In this session, we will compare our ideas on identifying errors and measuring error rates, including thinking about errors in six ways: 1) Problems along the way 2) Wrong result 3) Unnecessary action 4) Delayed-impact problem 5) Non-uptake or over-uptake 6) Technology problem We’ll wrap up with “tips and next steps”: an opportunity to consider what we now need to find out or do differently.
Key Insights
-
•
Errors in data collection and user input are foundational issues that compromise AI and service outcomes.
-
•
Users often 'fudge' answers due to ambiguous questions, privacy concerns, or to achieve a desired outcome.
-
•
Non-uptake, where users abandon a form or process, is a major source of error but is rarely published or measured.
-
•
Mistakes can be categorized as problems along the way, wrong results, unnecessary actions, and delayed impact issues.
-
•
Multiple accounts creation often occurs due to users forgetting existing accounts, leading to data duplicates and service inefficiencies.
-
•
Measuring error rates is complex; different metrics (per person, per attempt, completion vs. start) yield different perspectives.
-
•
Elections provide a useful model for measuring data quality, using turnout, participation, and eligibility rates.
-
•
Data quality deteriorates over time due to changes like moving, name changes, loss of documents, or organizational restructuring.
-
•
AI initiatives can provide a compelling rationale and funding opportunity for improving longstanding data quality problems.
-
•
Frameworks like the UK Government Data Quality Framework help organizations systematically assess and address data issues.
Notable Quotes
"If we get garbage in, we get garbage out — this is true for AI as much as for surveys or forms."
"People can make all sorts of inventive mistakes on their forms that AI struggles to interpret."
"Sometimes a form forces you into a wrong answer by giving inappropriate options."
"I’ve seen people fudge their date of birth so their child can attend a summer camp they aren’t technically eligible for."
"A major error in many services is users creating multiple accounts because they can’t find or reuse existing ones."
"An error might not be immediate; data can be fine when collected but deteriorate over time and cause problems later."
"Completion rates (conversion rates) and dropout rates are simple metrics but often not tracked or shared."
"Organizations rarely know their error rates, which limits their ability to improve user experience or data accuracy."
"Linking data quality efforts to AI initiatives can help secure attention and budget for necessary improvements."
"Data quality involves accuracy, completeness, uniqueness, timeliness, and representativeness—not just error reduction."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Giving people time and space to think individually and pressure test with AI before group discussion prevents dominance by power."
Kurt McCullochFaster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
March 10, 2026
"Apple’s innovation with VoiceOver on iOS changed the world by making accessibility a built-in, first-party responsibility."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
November 18, 2022
"The pandemic is reminding me of the positive and powerful force digital can play when we really need it most."
Leah BuleyClosing Plenary: The Crisis of Digital
March 31, 2020
"This is for me an amazing opportunity to see these ideas explored by brilliant people with a wonderful community."
Christian CrumlishIntroduction by our Conference Chair
December 6, 2022
"The smartest person in the room is the room itself."
Stephen AndersonPuzzled? How to Coordinate Humans for Complex Challenges
May 27, 2021
"Inclusive products reduce friction across customer support and operations by improving consistency across channels."
Gabriela BarnevaOperationalizing Inclusive Design in Service Design
November 20, 2025
"Your role is to ensure that the right people are at the party — a multidisciplinary team."
Jay BustamanteNavigating the Ethical Frontier: DesignOps Strategies for Responsible AI Innovation
October 2, 2023
"Qualitative research in a mixed methods setting needs to think about validity to support the bigger validity argument."
Chris EngledowlA Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust
April 28, 2023
"Beliefs are habits of action; they are the rules that guide how we decide to act."
Dave GrayLiminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
May 14, 2015
