Rosenverse
Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI

Thursday, January 8, 2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI
Speakers: Caroline Jarrett
Link:

Summary

We’re all aware of a big push to implement AI everywhere, including in the services that many of us are working on. It seems only fair to try to give the AI some good quality input in the hope of getting decent output from it.

Or, being more pessimistic: we probably expect to get some level of errors from the AI, but what do we know about the error rates in what we’re putting into the AI?

In this session, we will compare our ideas on identifying errors and measuring error rates, including thinking about errors in six ways:
1) Problems along the way
2) Wrong result
3) Unnecessary action
4) Delayed-impact problem
5) Non-uptake or over-uptake
6) Technology problem
We’ll wrap up with “tips and next steps”: an opportunity to consider what we now need to find out or do differently.

Key Insights

  • •

    Errors in data collection and user input are foundational issues that compromise AI and service outcomes.

  • •

    Users often 'fudge' answers due to ambiguous questions, privacy concerns, or to achieve a desired outcome.

  • •

    Non-uptake, where users abandon a form or process, is a major source of error but is rarely published or measured.

  • •

    Mistakes can be categorized as problems along the way, wrong results, unnecessary actions, and delayed impact issues.

  • •

    Multiple accounts creation often occurs due to users forgetting existing accounts, leading to data duplicates and service inefficiencies.

  • •

    Measuring error rates is complex; different metrics (per person, per attempt, completion vs. start) yield different perspectives.

  • •

    Elections provide a useful model for measuring data quality, using turnout, participation, and eligibility rates.

  • •

    Data quality deteriorates over time due to changes like moving, name changes, loss of documents, or organizational restructuring.

  • •

    AI initiatives can provide a compelling rationale and funding opportunity for improving longstanding data quality problems.

  • •

    Frameworks like the UK Government Data Quality Framework help organizations systematically assess and address data issues.

Notable Quotes

"If we get garbage in, we get garbage out — this is true for AI as much as for surveys or forms."

"People can make all sorts of inventive mistakes on their forms that AI struggles to interpret."

"Sometimes a form forces you into a wrong answer by giving inappropriate options."

"I’ve seen people fudge their date of birth so their child can attend a summer camp they aren’t technically eligible for."

"A major error in many services is users creating multiple accounts because they can’t find or reuse existing ones."

"An error might not be immediate; data can be fine when collected but deteriorate over time and cause problems later."

"Completion rates (conversion rates) and dropout rates are simple metrics but often not tracked or shared."

"Organizations rarely know their error rates, which limits their ability to improve user experience or data accuracy."

"Linking data quality efforts to AI initiatives can help secure attention and budget for necessary improvements."

"Data quality involves accuracy, completeness, uniqueness, timeliness, and representativeness—not just error reduction."

Ask the Rosenbot
Joerg Beringer
Scaling User Research with AI: Continuous Discovery of User Needs in Minutes
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Sarah Alvarado
How to make UX research leadership more effective [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
You’ve got Gold! A Rosenverse demo with Lou Rosenfeld
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks Day 2
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Ovetta Sampson
Turning UX Passion into Real Product Influence
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Abby Covert
Is the shift greater than the sum of its parts?
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Uday Gajendar
Theme 1: Introduction
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Anna Poznyakov
Get The Most Out Of Stakeholder Collaboration—and Maximize Your Research Impact
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Cara Maritz
The Art of Extrapolation
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Verónica Urzúa
The B-side of the Research Impact
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Ted Neward
Theme 4: Enterprise Organizational Journey
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Joel Branch
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Rachel Garb
Exit Interview #8: Facing a blank slate in retirement when constraints are all you’ve ever known
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Alana Washington
Theme 3 Intro
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Katie Hansen
Experimental research: techniques for deep, psychology-driven insights
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Katie Johnson
Disrupting generative AI products with just-in-time consumer insights
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold

More Videos

Mansi Gupta

"Snow clearing policies choose to clear roads before pavements, deeply ignoring responsibilities that are likely to fall on women."

Mansi Gupta

Drawing from Feminist Practice to Make Inclusive Design Operational

September 9, 2022

Paul Bakaus

"Purple gradients are the equivalent of AI slop from 2022 — not today's AI slop."

Paul Bakaus

Killing the handoff: Iterating design live in the browser on real production code

June 10, 2026

Megan Nipe

"We break down overarching messages into pillar messages and key proof points to create digestible, empathetic communication."

Megan Nipe Lyndsay Booth

Human-Centered Design for Engagement: Maturing from Newsletterville to Personalized, One-to-One Messaging

December 8, 2021

Kayla Farrell

"I started spending more time understanding agent processes at a deeper level beyond just answering tactical questions."

Kayla Farrell Chelsey Glasson Sean Fitzell Jared LeClerc

What It's Like To Be a User Researcher at Compass

March 12, 2021

Michelle Bejian Lotia

"Show don’t tell is really critical for getting stakeholder buy-in on a new tool like this."

Michelle Bejian Lotia Anne-Marie Morell

Rolling Out a Repository: How Zapier Centralizes Insights from Across their Organization

March 28, 2023

Megan Blocker

"We can all become experts at stuff if we work hard enough – sometimes you have to fake it till you make it."

Megan Blocker

Getting to the “So What?”: How Management Consulting Practices Can Transform Your Approach to Research

March 26, 2024

Kate Stern

"The metaverse is the successor to the mobile internet, and we’re only at the dial-up stage of its development."

Kate Stern

Scaling Learning for the Future

September 9, 2022

Vanessa Varin

"Feedback is a lot like holding up a mirror. You're reflecting what's already working and like using a flashlight to hide in the corners."

Vanessa Varin

Feedback: The Other F-Word

September 10, 2025

Uday Gajendar

"Sponsor sessions are so great that people want recordings. They’re not sales pitches."

Uday Gajendar Louis Rosenfeld

Day 2 Welcome

June 5, 2024