Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
How Will Design be Taught When the Schools Shut Down?
This video is featured in the Future of Design playlist.
Summary
Design schools are collapsing—literally. When institutions like California College of the Arts close after more than a century, it’s clear our old model of design education can’t survive economic pressure, tech disruption, or outdated ideas about what “training” should be. So what comes next? Nathan Shedroff, Thomas J. McLeish, and Hugh Dubberly will lead an exploration of what might replace the design school as we know it: apprenticeships, corporate academies, AI mentors, decentralized credentialing—and models no one’s tried (yet). It’s not just about how designers will learn, but who gets to define what education means in the future.
Key Insights
-
•
Design and higher education face severe economic and enrollment crises exacerbated by demographic shifts and political pressures, threatening many independent colleges.
-
•
Traditional admission processes may be replaced by universal acceptance combined with personalized learning journeys guided by free and validated educational content.
-
•
AI is not only a disruptive tool but a new medium and material for creative design practice and education requiring novel pedagogical approaches.
-
•
Critical thinking combined with critical making underpins design education, but both theorizing and making can serve as entry points in a recursive learning loop.
-
•
Changing communication technologies have historically reshaped knowledge transmission, and AI may fundamentally transform how collective knowledge is built and shared.
-
•
Measurement and assessment in design education are challenging due to multiple valid answers and the subjective nature of critique, risking oversimplified scoring metrics.
-
•
Blending apprenticeship/internship models with classroom co-learning may better prepare students for real-world design practice than traditional academic structures.
-
•
Lifelong learning should be central to education, enabling returning alumni to teach and share knowledge continuously, not just one-off credentialing.
-
•
Play and experimentation are essential in engaging learners with AI and complex systems, helping avoid black-box dependence and promoting creativity.
-
•
Design education lags industry needs partly due to conservative academic culture and governance often by non-designers, necessitating stronger integration and innovation.
Notable Quotes
"What if everyone was accepted? We could rise almost anyone to proficiency if the curriculum and pedagogy are strong enough."
"I believe that 50% of white-collar jobs are just going away in the next 5 to 10 years."
"The current wave of AI has disrupted practice so much, so quickly, that it's difficult to tell what practice is or what it will be in three years."
"Critical making requires critique, theory, activity, reflection, leading back to theory, but it doesn't have to start with theory. It can start anywhere."
"Reading books and articles is no longer central for many young people. What will replace books and articles for collective knowledge building?"
"We need to figure out how to assess design projects and designers better because employers need to make choices, but design resists simple scoring."
"What if learning was always mobile, decentralized, distributed among people and institutions, with new ways to acknowledge learning beyond grades?"
"Kids love to play. They challenge the world through games and simulation, so the things we create need to support play and experimentation."
"Universities are fairly recent inventions; knowledge transfer happened for thousands of years by learning in communities before formal institutions."
"Design schools are often governed by non-designers and are surprisingly conservative, slow to change, and sometimes exploit precarious gig workers."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Home Depot is the sixth largest private company in the US with over 500,000 employees, yet our deliveries experience was embarrassingly bad."
Anat Fintzi Rachel MinnicksDelivering at Scale: Making Traction with Resistant Partners
June 9, 2022
"Designing and researching wisdom is a dialogue, not a monologue."
Cassini Nazir Meah LinThe Dangers of Empathy: Toward More Responsible Design Research
March 27, 2023
"Data repositories often fail because of the complexity in cataloging and who can access the information."
Andrea GallagherThe Problem Space
May 16, 2019
"This makes our jobs really worthwhile — impacting people's lives both in our products and workplaces."
Saara Kamppari-MillerTheme Three Intro
October 4, 2023
"If you don't speak up about ludicrous requests, someone will ask why you didn’t say anything."
Joshua GravesWe Need To Talk: Managing Ludicrous Requests at Work (Part 3 of 3)
May 12, 2025
"John Rucklin said if your questionnaire isn’t relevant, you can devise your own — and that’s what we did with the Accessible Usability Scale."
Sam ProulxSUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
September 29, 2021
"We balance AI speed with human depth to maximize value without sacrificing empathy or rigor."
Gillian Salerno-Rebic Mark MicheliFrom Insight to Impact: How JourneySpark Used WEVO Pulse + Pro to Drive a 50% Lift in Ad Engagement
June 11, 2025
"We covered critical design gaps without waiting for headcount allocation or hiring delays."
Alicia MootyDesign Staffing Models
September 30, 2021
"Accept that the first iteration won’t be 100% accessible; moving the needle bit by bit still creates huge impact."
Suzan Bednarz Hilary SunderlandAccessibilityOps for All
January 8, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What strategies help UX researchers gain access to healthcare workflows in overwhelmed systems?
What practices help maintain continuous learning and feedback loops after initial research coaching?
How does including metadata like methodology, market, and date improve the quality of research repository search results?