Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Research in the Face of Complexity: New Sensibility for New Situations
Summary
How we design and deliver products is changing; how research plays is following suit. Our environment is complex, and evolving. AI’s role in design, product, research, and engineering is accelerating. New practices are shifting the boundaries between our functions. Strategic research programs play outside of functional lines, working with the fabric product development and the needs of different teams and situations. We shift our focus from tuning and scaling the research machine, towards tending the garden of shared understanding and possibility. In this session, we’ll explore paths for research practitioners and programs who want to operate effectively in uncertainty. We’ll discuss how complexity informs research strategy, and look at activity in the organization through lenses that create new opportunities for the research practice.
Key Insights
-
•
Most product organizations operate within complex adaptive systems, not predictable or purely complicated environments.
-
•
Traditional research projects that produce isolated insights often fail to impact product outcomes effectively.
-
•
Managing emergence—the unpredictable unfolding of outcomes—should be a core research focus rather than just delivering findings.
-
•
Dave Snowden’s Cynefin framework helps distinguish domains: clear, complicated, complex, and chaotic, with complexity being the key challenge for product teams.
-
•
Using vineyard management as a metaphor highlights that contextual factors drastically affect outcomes, meaning research approaches must be tailored per team context.
-
•
Direct actions or recommendations in complex systems rarely achieve desired outcomes without managing interactions and relationships.
-
•
Research democratization is promising but needs nuanced, context-specific approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.
-
•
Tools like AIMS (Acting, Interactions, Monitors, Scaffolding) provide ways to intervene thoughtfully in complex adaptive systems.
-
•
Continuous agile cycles can be limiting for research; longer, consultative, and milestone-based approaches may be required to handle complexity.
-
•
Building trust and relationships, especially for remote researchers, is crucial to gaining access and influence within complex teams.
Notable Quotes
"Research alone is insufficient to solve complex organizational problems; it’s more about learning how to work with the teams and complexity."
"Helping teams is much more like managing a children’s party than engineering a bridge."
"If you want to grow good grapes, you need to manage the vineyard well—but every vineyard has different demands due to its context."
"Direct action rarely gets what we want in complex systems; instead, we must know what we can actually manage."
"Introducing insights into a system is just adding a new actor; without managing interactions, nothing changes."
"Democratization of research is interesting but not a one-size-fits-all; it needs quick assessment of what a team truly needs."
"Monitoring for weak signals and early signs of emergence is as important as intervention itself."
"Putting scaffolding in place helps self-organization in complexity—like training wires in vineyards or using shared maps in teams."
"Most research methods come from an engineering mindset suitable for complicated problems, but product problems are mostly complex."
"Working with complexity requires maintaining ambiguity as long as possible before converging on action."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"White space risk is about the surprises that happen between organizational boundaries and roles."
Ben Reason Aline Horta Majid Iqbal Fabiano LeoniMaking the system visible: The fastest path to better decisions
November 20, 2025
"When you know yourself, you are empowered, you accept yourself, and you are invincible."
Dr. Nikki SmithResearch Strategy: Connecting Insights to Outcomes
March 12, 2025
"People are talking the talk about diversity and inclusion, but the fear is, are they really walking the walk?"
Chris Geison Jemma AhmedWhat's Next for Research?
June 17, 2021
"It’s difficult to see the impact in digital technology, but workshops help teams visualize energy use and timing."
Tristin OldaniTurning awareness into action with Climate UX
January 16, 2025
"Social institutions need generations to adapt, but now changes happen within fragments of a lifetime, making transitions painful."
Dave GrayConnection, Community, and the Future of Work
May 28, 2026
"Trauma among participants and practitioners is an industry problem we can no longer ignore."
Eduardo OrtizTheme 3 Intro
March 13, 2025
"In SAFe, product owner and product manager roles are reversed from what some teams expect, which causes confusion."
Jack MoffettSAFe or Sorry?
May 29, 2019
"You either give money as an unprofessional civilian or you do your job and offer professional services to help the crisis."
Xenia Adjoubei Sean BruceEmpowering Communities Through the Researcher in Residence Program
March 29, 2023
"Delivery gets missed at the right time often; sequencing, deployment, and adoption planning are critical."
Sean McKayWhole Product Thinking: Expanding beyond problem and solution space thinking
March 14, 2024