Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Research in the Face of Complexity: New Sensibility for New Situations
Summary
How we design and deliver products is changing; how research plays is following suit. Our environment is complex, and evolving. AI’s role in design, product, research, and engineering is accelerating. New practices are shifting the boundaries between our functions. Strategic research programs play outside of functional lines, working with the fabric product development and the needs of different teams and situations. We shift our focus from tuning and scaling the research machine, towards tending the garden of shared understanding and possibility. In this session, we’ll explore paths for research practitioners and programs who want to operate effectively in uncertainty. We’ll discuss how complexity informs research strategy, and look at activity in the organization through lenses that create new opportunities for the research practice.
Key Insights
-
•
Most product organizations operate within complex adaptive systems, not predictable or purely complicated environments.
-
•
Traditional research projects that produce isolated insights often fail to impact product outcomes effectively.
-
•
Managing emergence—the unpredictable unfolding of outcomes—should be a core research focus rather than just delivering findings.
-
•
Dave Snowden’s Cynefin framework helps distinguish domains: clear, complicated, complex, and chaotic, with complexity being the key challenge for product teams.
-
•
Using vineyard management as a metaphor highlights that contextual factors drastically affect outcomes, meaning research approaches must be tailored per team context.
-
•
Direct actions or recommendations in complex systems rarely achieve desired outcomes without managing interactions and relationships.
-
•
Research democratization is promising but needs nuanced, context-specific approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.
-
•
Tools like AIMS (Acting, Interactions, Monitors, Scaffolding) provide ways to intervene thoughtfully in complex adaptive systems.
-
•
Continuous agile cycles can be limiting for research; longer, consultative, and milestone-based approaches may be required to handle complexity.
-
•
Building trust and relationships, especially for remote researchers, is crucial to gaining access and influence within complex teams.
Notable Quotes
"Research alone is insufficient to solve complex organizational problems; it’s more about learning how to work with the teams and complexity."
"Helping teams is much more like managing a children’s party than engineering a bridge."
"If you want to grow good grapes, you need to manage the vineyard well—but every vineyard has different demands due to its context."
"Direct action rarely gets what we want in complex systems; instead, we must know what we can actually manage."
"Introducing insights into a system is just adding a new actor; without managing interactions, nothing changes."
"Democratization of research is interesting but not a one-size-fits-all; it needs quick assessment of what a team truly needs."
"Monitoring for weak signals and early signs of emergence is as important as intervention itself."
"Putting scaffolding in place helps self-organization in complexity—like training wires in vineyards or using shared maps in teams."
"Most research methods come from an engineering mindset suitable for complicated problems, but product problems are mostly complex."
"Working with complexity requires maintaining ambiguity as long as possible before converging on action."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Compensation in cash or something as close to cash as possible is the best way to go, but sometimes collective donations work better."
Sarah FathallahLessening the Research Burden on Vulnerable Communities
March 30, 2020
"We helped through Homestat last year to move 690 people into housing."
Ariel KennanBuilding a Design Culture
June 9, 2017
"Onboarding isn’t a single event or process, it’s an ecosystem with many touchpoints impacting the new employee experience."
Russ UngerOnboarding: The Ecosystem, not the Afterthought
November 7, 2017
"I’m worried you aren’t up to it, frankly."
Dan WillisEnterprise Storytelling Sessions
June 8, 2017
"Google is the digital equivalent of the local shopping mall or the local main street."
Erin WeigelReal-world lessons to improve your conversion rates
June 26, 2024
"Yesterday we saw themes emerge on striving for inclusion, applying equity and sustaining the work over time."
Ariel KennanTheme 2 Intro
December 9, 2021
"When teams solve their own problems, they make high impact decisions on their own."
Daniel OrbachZero to One: Co-Creating Operating Models with your Team
September 23, 2024
"Visualizing carbon emissions on user journeys provokes conversations that numbers alone might not evoke."
James ChudleyDecarbonising User Journeys: How minimising enables us to do more with less
February 19, 2025
"We’re not curing brain cancer here; sometimes perfect just has to be good enough."
Leah Buley Joe NatoliAsk Me Anything with Leah Buley and Joe Natoli, co-authors of The User Experience Team of One (2nd edition)
October 8, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
In what ways can sharing AI-generated prototype components through GitHub benefit engineering teams?
What benefits come from structuring AI personas with detailed roles and boundaries in design workflows?
How can non-developers generate production-useful prototypes without coding knowledge using AI tools like Cursor?