Rosenverse
Leading through ambiguity: Supporting a design team relearning their craft

Accessible only to conference ticket holders.

Log in Create account

For 90 days after a conference, only paid ticket holders can watch conference videos. After that, all Gold members have access.

If you have purchased recording access and cannot see the video, please contact support.

Leading through ambiguity: Supporting a design team relearning their craft

Gold
Tuesday, June 9, 2026 • Designing with AI 2026

This video is featured in the AI Conference playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Leading through ambiguity: Supporting a design team relearning their craft
Speakers: Beth Chappell
Link:

Summary

Our team had been designing AI features for some time before we were forced to confront what that meant for our own craft. At Articulate, we build tools that help people create learning at scale. As we introduced AI-augmented creation workflows, we focused on helping learning designers move faster and generate ideas more easily. But those same forces began reshaping how our own design team worked under the pressure of sustained ambiguity. What started as workflow optimization became real-time field research into how designers learn, resist, and adapt when the act of creation itself changes. Familiar practices began to break, observing where problem framing eroded, critique expanded instead of converging, and experience stopped guaranteeing great judgment. This talk is an ongoing case study in leading teams through that shift. It also reflects on how our internal experience designing with AI became a critical lens for understanding the people we build for.

Key Insights

  • AI-generated content often hides a reasoning gap where the AI's assumptions diverge from the creator's original intentions.

  • Polished AI outputs create a false sense of completion, making it harder to question or critique the work effectively.

  • Humans are poor judges of how much AI is actually helping; confidence from AI can be misleading.

  • Visible reasoning features in AI tools often do not accurately reflect the model's true decision-making process.

  • Design critique collapses when teams fail to name clear criteria for judgment and when responsibility for AI outputs is unclear.

  • Adaptation to AI is less about acquiring new tools and more about clearing away noise and reclaiming existing core skills.

  • The role identity of designers is shifting from deeply hidden craft to more visible communication and reasoning skills akin to management.

  • Leadership must recognize when team members struggle to adapt and balance support with holding expectations to maintain impact.

  • Rapid AI tool adoption increases the volume of outputs faster than teams can inspect or align on underlying reasoning.

  • Building bridges across the reasoning gap requires shared language and explicit articulation of decisions during AI-assisted workflows.

Notable Quotes

"The gap between what the output says and what the intention was is what we're going to call the reasoning gap."

"AI doesn't make bad ideas more dangerous. It makes unfinished ideas more convincing."

"The number of crossings between intention and generation is increasing faster than our ability to examine what happened between them."

"Between your prompt and prototype, the AI made 40 decisions that you can't trace."

"The shown reasoning wasn't the actual reasoning. It was just a pretty story to get us to trust it."

"If you're presenting a concept, you're endorsing it. You need to be able to say why."

"What AI is asking out of every individual contributor is to take on the skill set of a manager."

"When tired becomes the norm, people get playful again because they stop being married to the tools and start being curious about what's next."

"Your job as a leader isn't just empathy. It's naming what the new system requires and holding the line."

"The work right now isn't about outrunning the reasoning gap. The goal is to build bridges across it."

Ask the Rosenbot
Jim Kalbach
Peace is waged with sticky notes: Mapping Real-World Experiences
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
John Cutler
Prioritization for designers and product managers (1st of 3 seminars)
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Dave Hoffer
UX Job Search AMA #2 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Kaaren Hanson
Stop Talking, Start Doing
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Victor Lombardi
Bridging Design and Climate Science
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Leah Buley
Closing Plenary: The Crisis of Digital
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Jack Behar
How to Build Prototypes that Behave like an End-Product
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Denise Jacobs
Interactive Keynote: Social Change by Design
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Joshua Noble
Casual Inference
2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Sam Proulx
Accessibility: An Opportunity to Innovate
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
John Taschek
Making People the X-Factor in the Enterprise
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
The power to heal and harm
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Kat Vellos
Opener: The Other L Word
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Sam Ladner
Methodologies: Beyond the interview [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Alana Washington
Theme 1: Introduction and Provocation
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold

More Videos

Dan Hill

"Those days are over this new big tech is coming in so time to move on."

Dan Hill

Strategic design, slowdown, and the infrastructures of everyday life

April 21, 2022

Alexandra Schmidt

"Standard design research looks for pain points, not harms, and harms often cannot be identified in typical user research."

Alexandra Schmidt

Why Ethics Can't Save Tech

November 18, 2022

Chris Engledowl

"If the survey wording changes, measuring change over time becomes difficult, but improving the survey builds trust."

Chris Engledowl

A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust

April 28, 2023

Corey Nelson

"You do not have to go publicly thank the employer who just laid you off. They’ll be fine without it."

Corey Nelson Amy Santee

Layoffs

November 15, 2022

Toby Haug

"As a designer and leader in this space, I've had to learn a lot about policy so I can come in and have really deep discussions with policy folks as a peer."

Toby Haug

Discussion

June 9, 2017

Sam Proulx

"Timely interactions that log users out without saving progress cause abandonment, especially for people with disabilities."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

June 7, 2023

Russ Unger

"Day one is a commencement, a graduation from candidate to employee, not a paperwork slog."

Russ Unger

Onboarding: The Ecosystem, not the Afterthought

November 7, 2017

Kristin Taylor

"If we avoid how we work together, we create disjointed experiences and cause confusion and frustration for riders."

Kristin Taylor

Building Bridges Across Organizational Silos

November 18, 2022

Etienne Fang

"Connecting strings of Christmas lights is a mental model for connecting teams’ insights without superseding their systems."

Etienne Fang

Power of Insights: Why sharing is better than silos with Uber’s Insights Platform

December 16, 2019