Rosenverse
Leading through ambiguity: Supporting a design team relearning their craft

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Leading through ambiguity: Supporting a design team relearning their craft

Gold
Tuesday, June 9, 2026 • Designing with AI 2026

This video is featured in the AI Conference playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Leading through ambiguity: Supporting a design team relearning their craft
Speakers: Beth Chappell
Link:

Summary

Our team had been designing AI features for some time before we were forced to confront what that meant for our own craft. At Articulate, we build tools that help people create learning at scale. As we introduced AI-augmented creation workflows, we focused on helping learning designers move faster and generate ideas more easily. But those same forces began reshaping how our own design team worked under the pressure of sustained ambiguity.

What started as workflow optimization became real-time field research into how designers learn, resist, and adapt when the act of creation itself changes. Familiar practices began to break, observing where problem framing eroded, critique expanded instead of converging, and experience stopped guaranteeing great judgment.

This talk is an ongoing case study in leading teams through that shift. It also reflects on how our internal experience designing with AI became a critical lens for understanding the people we build for.

Key Insights

  • •

    AI-generated content often hides a reasoning gap where the AI's assumptions diverge from the creator's original intentions.

  • •

    Polished AI outputs create a false sense of completion, making it harder to question or critique the work effectively.

  • •

    Humans are poor judges of how much AI is actually helping; confidence from AI can be misleading.

  • •

    Visible reasoning features in AI tools often do not accurately reflect the model's true decision-making process.

  • •

    Design critique collapses when teams fail to name clear criteria for judgment and when responsibility for AI outputs is unclear.

  • •

    Adaptation to AI is less about acquiring new tools and more about clearing away noise and reclaiming existing core skills.

  • •

    The role identity of designers is shifting from deeply hidden craft to more visible communication and reasoning skills akin to management.

  • •

    Leadership must recognize when team members struggle to adapt and balance support with holding expectations to maintain impact.

  • •

    Rapid AI tool adoption increases the volume of outputs faster than teams can inspect or align on underlying reasoning.

  • •

    Building bridges across the reasoning gap requires shared language and explicit articulation of decisions during AI-assisted workflows.

Notable Quotes

"The gap between what the output says and what the intention was is what we're going to call the reasoning gap."

"AI doesn't make bad ideas more dangerous. It makes unfinished ideas more convincing."

"The number of crossings between intention and generation is increasing faster than our ability to examine what happened between them."

"Between your prompt and prototype, the AI made 40 decisions that you can't trace."

"The shown reasoning wasn't the actual reasoning. It was just a pretty story to get us to trust it."

"If you're presenting a concept, you're endorsing it. You need to be able to say why."

"What AI is asking out of every individual contributor is to take on the skill set of a manager."

"When tired becomes the norm, people get playful again because they stop being married to the tools and start being curious about what's next."

"Your job as a leader isn't just empathy. It's naming what the new system requires and holding the line."

"The work right now isn't about outrunning the reasoning gap. The goal is to build bridges across it."

Ask the Rosenbot
Emily Lessard
RFPs Without Tears: Writing Inclusive RFPS that Don't Scare Away Talent
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Christian Crumlish
From tools to staff: What the next generation of agents means for the future of design
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Gold
Dave Gray
Connection, Community, and the Future of Work
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
World Usability Day Panel Discussion
2022 • DesignOps Community
Joe Meersman
Use AI to Drive Outcomes that Go Beyond the Design Sprint
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Margot Bloomstein
Fostering Trust in Your Brand and Beyond
2020 • Enterprise Community
Christopher Geison
Theme 1 Intro
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Sarah Flamion
Complex Problem? Add Clarity by Combining Research and Systems Thinking
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Amahra Spence
Designing for Liberation, Rehearsing Freedom
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Kate Kalcevich
Designing inclusively with AI
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Dave Hoffer
UX Job Search AMA #2 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Elizabeth Churchill
Exploring Cadence: You, Your Team, and Your Enterprise
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Nick Fine
How UX researchers can partner with (and not be replaced by) AI [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Laura Smith
Embedding Service Design and Agile Practice within UK Planning Teams to Create Services that Last
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Chui Chui Tan
Global insights: Embracing international and intercultural research for innovation
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Megan Clegg
Space for Everyone: Reframing Accessibility Through a Wider Lens
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold

More Videos

Matt LeMay

"You don’t get anyone to do anything."

Matt LeMay

You Don’t “Get” Anyone to Do Anything

December 6, 2022

Phil Gilbert

"Our design language gives broad ditches on either side of the road with some nuance, but no rigid libraries at first."

Phil Gilbert

A Consistent Culture of Design

May 14, 2015

Louis Rosenfeld

"Affordable, powerful AI and data-driven design have become shockingly practical for enterprise settings."

Louis Rosenfeld

Welcome / Housekeeping

June 6, 2023

Rachael Dietkus, LCSW

"The pressure to produce insights quickly defines many organizations shaped by 'move fast and break things' culture."

Rachael Dietkus, LCSW

The power to heal and harm

March 13, 2025

Jake Burghardt

"Tying insights directly into team backlogs or goals can transform research from information to active stakeholder in decisions."

Jake Burghardt

Finding More Inroads into Research Impact

February 20, 2026

Fatimah Richmond

"Corporate leaders don’t know how to integrate design leaders beyond the design org."

Fatimah Richmond

The Future of ReOps as a Strategic Function: A Roadmap for Getting There

March 25, 2024

Joshua Graves

"Psychological safety is key—if folks aren't in the right state, the conversation isn't productive."

Joshua Graves

We Need To Talk: Managing Ludicrous Requests at Work (Part 3 of 3)

May 12, 2025

Joshua Graves

"If a security camera were recording, what would they see? Focus on facts, not stories."

Joshua Graves

We Need To Talk: Navigating Conversations with Your Boss (Part 1 of 3)

April 14, 2025

Harry Max

"I’ve become a subversive designer because I’m now considered a product leader using prioritization at the organizational level."

Harry Max

Priority Zero: Some Things are More Equal than Others

June 9, 2016