Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young
This video is featured in the UX Watch Party playlist.
Summary
Sound familiar?
We can’t go on solving things based on our own thin understanding of how others perceive the problem. We can’t go on assuming everyone is in the same mood and context. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Indeed, we have done a lot of accidental harm in the world with the assumption that the tools we design are “neutral.” We need to get better at paying attention. We need to slow down and gather a richer, more nutritious understanding of the people we are trying to support. And we need to point a beam of light into possible future outcomes.
Let’s put equal emphasis on the problem. Spending equal time in the problem space generates rich understanding. Understanding the depths, perspectives, horizons and histories of the way people achieve their purposes opens up loads more opportunities. We can begin making solutions that eschew “engagement” to truly support different people in different ways.
The problem space deserves more attention and a slow cycle all of its own.
Key Insights
-
•
Most organizations overemphasize solutions and ignore deep understanding of users’ purposes in the problem space.
-
•
Big data correlations often lead to misleading conclusions if context and underlying reasoning aren’t explored.
-
•
Demographic breakdowns like age or gender rarely capture the true diversity of user thinking and motivations.
-
•
Thinking Styles are a more meaningful way to segment users based on their purposes and mental approaches.
-
•
Listening sessions provide rich qualitative data necessary to build cognitive empathy and uncover deep user insights.
-
•
Cognitive empathy is a skill that requires going beyond surface observations to understand people’s inner voices.
-
•
Technology disciplines are immature compared to fields like architecture or museum design that prioritize varied user purposes.
-
•
Most tech companies operate without proper ethical research oversight (e.g., institutional review boards).
-
•
Jobs to Be Done is useful for strategy but inadequate alone without rich qualitative problem space research.
-
•
Rich problem space research results remain valuable and relevant for years, unlike short-term solution testing data.
Notable Quotes
"We live in a solution culture that glorifies people who create solutions but not those who create knowledge."
"Correlation is not causation, and a lot of people in technology don’t understand that."
"Research theater is when results are designed just to create a reaction, not real understanding."
"Purpose is a super important word—understanding what a person is trying to get done, not just their behavior."
"You can’t meaningfully segment users by demographics alone if you want to support their real purposes."
"Cognitive empathy only forms with depth; you can’t build it at the surface level."
"Empathy is not sensitivity or an emotion—it is a skill that you have."
"Most technology research is not research at all but at best focus group testing, and often lacks ethics."
"We have this piece of glass and there’s a person on the other side, but we don’t understand their purpose."
"You have to build all the puzzle pieces with clear summaries before the patterns come together in mental models."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Google’s photo algorithm mistakenly tagged Black people as gorillas, which was called out by Jackie Elsene."
Nancy DouyonWe'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex
June 15, 2018
"We help teams onboard their coded components onto the UXPin platform so they can be enabled with component-driven prototyping."
Jack BeharHow to Build Prototypes that Behave like an End-Product
December 6, 2022
"Politics and ego conflicts are inevitable and separate challenges that seriously impact merger integration."
Jorge ArangoMeeting of the Waters: Designing for Successful Inorganic Growth
August 12, 2021
"No more than five key insights — any more and teams start going off in different directions."
Jon White Erin MayUnsticking Research for Better Information Flow
March 11, 2026
"Tracking complaints and fixing things immediately, even if it’s just one person, is a mark of good UX impact."
Jessamyn EdwardsSurviving Your UX Career in Enterprise Design
December 2, 2021
"Build better foundations, not better facades."
Stefanie OwensOptimizing for Outcomes: Transformation Design in Systems at Scale
December 4, 2024
"Friction can be good, especially when protecting private information."
Ron BronsonDesign, Consequences & Everyday Life
November 18, 2022
"We took thousands of hours of curated content and built a chatbot around it so it’s not garbage in, garbage out."
Louis RosenfeldThe Rosenbot and the Rosenverse: An AMA with Lou Rosenfeld
June 5, 2024
"Collaboration is not just beneficial, it's essential for effective climate action."
Ash BrownSilver Linings: What DesignOps Learned in the Shift to WFH
October 23, 2020