Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
In tech culture, everyone is hell-bent on coming up with answers and solutions. We all assume we know what the person’s problem is; rarely does tech culture start at the very beginning, understanding the variety of approaches real people have to their real purposes and different moods and contexts. Instead, we build an idea into experiments to see if it solves the imagined “problem.” Sound familiar? We can’t go on solving things based on our own thin understanding of how others perceive the problem. We can’t go on assuming everyone is in the same mood and context. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Indeed, we have done a lot of accidental harm in the world with the assumption that the tools we design are “neutral.” We need to get better at paying attention. We need to slow down and gather a richer, more nutritious understanding of the people we are trying to support. And we need to point a beam of light into possible future outcomes. Let’s put equal emphasis on the problem. Spending equal time in the problem space generates rich understanding. Understanding the depths, perspectives, horizons and histories of the way people achieve their purposes opens up loads more opportunities. We can begin making solutions that eschew “engagement” to truly support different people in different ways. The problem space deserves more attention and a slow cycle all of its own.
Key Insights
-
•
Most organizations overemphasize solutions and ignore deep understanding of users’ purposes in the problem space.
-
•
Big data correlations often lead to misleading conclusions if context and underlying reasoning aren’t explored.
-
•
Demographic breakdowns like age or gender rarely capture the true diversity of user thinking and motivations.
-
•
Thinking Styles are a more meaningful way to segment users based on their purposes and mental approaches.
-
•
Listening sessions provide rich qualitative data necessary to build cognitive empathy and uncover deep user insights.
-
•
Cognitive empathy is a skill that requires going beyond surface observations to understand people’s inner voices.
-
•
Technology disciplines are immature compared to fields like architecture or museum design that prioritize varied user purposes.
-
•
Most tech companies operate without proper ethical research oversight (e.g., institutional review boards).
-
•
Jobs to Be Done is useful for strategy but inadequate alone without rich qualitative problem space research.
-
•
Rich problem space research results remain valuable and relevant for years, unlike short-term solution testing data.
Notable Quotes
"We live in a solution culture that glorifies people who create solutions but not those who create knowledge."
"Correlation is not causation, and a lot of people in technology don’t understand that."
"Research theater is when results are designed just to create a reaction, not real understanding."
"Purpose is a super important word—understanding what a person is trying to get done, not just their behavior."
"You can’t meaningfully segment users by demographics alone if you want to support their real purposes."
"Cognitive empathy only forms with depth; you can’t build it at the surface level."
"Empathy is not sensitivity or an emotion—it is a skill that you have."
"Most technology research is not research at all but at best focus group testing, and often lacks ethics."
"We have this piece of glass and there’s a person on the other side, but we don’t understand their purpose."
"You have to build all the puzzle pieces with clear summaries before the patterns come together in mental models."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Plans tend to be worthless but the planning process is incredibly invaluable."
Giff ConstableFinancial fluency for product leaders: AMA with Giff Constable
April 11, 2024
"We saw a 2.5 times increase in active monthly users and a 1.5 times increase in purchases attributed to the AI assistant."
Kritika YadavOptimizing AI Conversations: A Case Study on Personalized Shopping Assistance Frameworks
June 10, 2025
"Trust is created between two people. Safety is created in a group of people."
Alla WeinbergHow to Build and Scale Team Safety
January 8, 2024
"I got invited to be an expert witness on an FTC legal case about deceptive designs, which changed my career."
Harry Brignull Mark Leiser Robert StribleyBeyond Clicks and Tricks: Why deceptive design has grown into a regulatory faultline
January 16, 2026
"Subpar experiences make it out into the world due to these pressures."
Kit UngerTheme 2: Introduction
June 10, 2021
"Forget about the tools 100% at the beginning of the conversation and perhaps all the way to the end."
Sofia QuinteroBeyond Tools: The Messy Business of Implementing Research Repositories
March 10, 2022
"Calling it Lean UX might have limited its impact because people think UX is just for 'those people'."
Jeff GothelfThe Intersection of Lean and Design
January 10, 2019
"B2B is b*******, it’s really just people that make up businesses."
Kit Unger Lada GorlenkoTheme 3 Intro
June 10, 2022
"The goal is not to take notes; the goal is to think effectively, as Andy Matus says."
Jorge ArangoThe Best of Both Worlds: How to Integrate Paper and Digital Notes (1st of 3 seminars)
April 5, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How might quantitative ethnography enable real-time qualitative insights during ongoing data collection?
What role do small wins play in building credibility and trust for UX in healthcare environments?
Why is the emerging AI integration in healthcare seen as a major opportunity for UX professionals?