Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
In tech culture, everyone is hell-bent on coming up with answers and solutions. We all assume we know what the person’s problem is; rarely does tech culture start at the very beginning, understanding the variety of approaches real people have to their real purposes and different moods and contexts. Instead, we build an idea into experiments to see if it solves the imagined “problem.” Sound familiar? We can’t go on solving things based on our own thin understanding of how others perceive the problem. We can’t go on assuming everyone is in the same mood and context. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Indeed, we have done a lot of accidental harm in the world with the assumption that the tools we design are “neutral.” We need to get better at paying attention. We need to slow down and gather a richer, more nutritious understanding of the people we are trying to support. And we need to point a beam of light into possible future outcomes. Let’s put equal emphasis on the problem. Spending equal time in the problem space generates rich understanding. Understanding the depths, perspectives, horizons and histories of the way people achieve their purposes opens up loads more opportunities. We can begin making solutions that eschew “engagement” to truly support different people in different ways. The problem space deserves more attention and a slow cycle all of its own.
Key Insights
-
•
Most organizations overemphasize solutions and ignore deep understanding of users’ purposes in the problem space.
-
•
Big data correlations often lead to misleading conclusions if context and underlying reasoning aren’t explored.
-
•
Demographic breakdowns like age or gender rarely capture the true diversity of user thinking and motivations.
-
•
Thinking Styles are a more meaningful way to segment users based on their purposes and mental approaches.
-
•
Listening sessions provide rich qualitative data necessary to build cognitive empathy and uncover deep user insights.
-
•
Cognitive empathy is a skill that requires going beyond surface observations to understand people’s inner voices.
-
•
Technology disciplines are immature compared to fields like architecture or museum design that prioritize varied user purposes.
-
•
Most tech companies operate without proper ethical research oversight (e.g., institutional review boards).
-
•
Jobs to Be Done is useful for strategy but inadequate alone without rich qualitative problem space research.
-
•
Rich problem space research results remain valuable and relevant for years, unlike short-term solution testing data.
Notable Quotes
"We live in a solution culture that glorifies people who create solutions but not those who create knowledge."
"Correlation is not causation, and a lot of people in technology don’t understand that."
"Research theater is when results are designed just to create a reaction, not real understanding."
"Purpose is a super important word—understanding what a person is trying to get done, not just their behavior."
"You can’t meaningfully segment users by demographics alone if you want to support their real purposes."
"Cognitive empathy only forms with depth; you can’t build it at the surface level."
"Empathy is not sensitivity or an emotion—it is a skill that you have."
"Most technology research is not research at all but at best focus group testing, and often lacks ethics."
"We have this piece of glass and there’s a person on the other side, but we don’t understand their purpose."
"You have to build all the puzzle pieces with clear summaries before the patterns come together in mental models."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"By understanding your environment and having those conversations with your product manager, you can create a relationship that is sustainable and efficient."
Noreen Whysel Katie SaindonShort Take #4: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers
December 6, 2022
"We're at a pivotal moment where technology can truly make a difference in sustainability."
Ash BrownSilver Linings: What DesignOps Learned in the Shift to WFH
October 23, 2020
"Cornelius Rushrew will set the stage and tone for how to tackle problems at scale."
Uday GajendarTheme 1: Introduction
June 9, 2021
"Empathy is pointed on both ends—it affects you as much as the one you empathize with."
Cassini Nazir Meah LinThe Dangers of Empathy: Toward More Responsible Design Research
March 27, 2023
"Every research project is a chance to serve the whole organization and bring in missing perspectives."
Gregg BernsteinOpportunistic Research with Gregg Bernstein
July 11, 2019
"Design for Delight wasn’t about fun — it was deliberately designing for delight to engage customers emotionally."
Kaaren HansonStop Talking, Start Doing
June 9, 2017
"Being involved early in product planning lets us bring the art and science of research to where it can be most helpful."
Erin May Roberta Dombrowski Laura Oxenfeld Brooke HintonDistributed, Democratized, Decentralized: Finding a Research Model to Support Your Org
March 10, 2022
"Decision makers often have to try to piece all the pieces of the puzzle together themselves."
Brad Peters Anne MamaghaniShort Take #1: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers
December 6, 2022
"Find your people — those with whom you have genuine chemistry and can be your authentic self."
Tutti TaygerlyVideconference: How to Work with Difficult People with Tutti Taygerly
June 25, 2020
