Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young
Summary
In tech culture, everyone is hell-bent on coming up with answers and solutions. We all assume we know what the person’s problem is; rarely does tech culture start at the very beginning, understanding the variety of approaches real people have to their real purposes and different moods and contexts. Instead, we build an idea into experiments to see if it solves the imagined “problem.” Sound familiar? We can’t go on solving things based on our own thin understanding of how others perceive the problem. We can’t go on assuming everyone is in the same mood and context. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Indeed, we have done a lot of accidental harm in the world with the assumption that the tools we design are “neutral.” We need to get better at paying attention. We need to slow down and gather a richer, more nutritious understanding of the people we are trying to support. And we need to point a beam of light into possible future outcomes. Let’s put equal emphasis on the problem. Spending equal time in the problem space generates rich understanding. Understanding the depths, perspectives, horizons and histories of the way people achieve their purposes opens up loads more opportunities. We can begin making solutions that eschew “engagement” to truly support different people in different ways. The problem space deserves more attention and a slow cycle all of its own.
Key Insights
-
•
Most organizations overemphasize solutions and ignore deep understanding of users’ purposes in the problem space.
-
•
Big data correlations often lead to misleading conclusions if context and underlying reasoning aren’t explored.
-
•
Demographic breakdowns like age or gender rarely capture the true diversity of user thinking and motivations.
-
•
Thinking Styles are a more meaningful way to segment users based on their purposes and mental approaches.
-
•
Listening sessions provide rich qualitative data necessary to build cognitive empathy and uncover deep user insights.
-
•
Cognitive empathy is a skill that requires going beyond surface observations to understand people’s inner voices.
-
•
Technology disciplines are immature compared to fields like architecture or museum design that prioritize varied user purposes.
-
•
Most tech companies operate without proper ethical research oversight (e.g., institutional review boards).
-
•
Jobs to Be Done is useful for strategy but inadequate alone without rich qualitative problem space research.
-
•
Rich problem space research results remain valuable and relevant for years, unlike short-term solution testing data.
Notable Quotes
"We live in a solution culture that glorifies people who create solutions but not those who create knowledge."
"Correlation is not causation, and a lot of people in technology don’t understand that."
"Research theater is when results are designed just to create a reaction, not real understanding."
"Purpose is a super important word—understanding what a person is trying to get done, not just their behavior."
"You can’t meaningfully segment users by demographics alone if you want to support their real purposes."
"Cognitive empathy only forms with depth; you can’t build it at the surface level."
"Empathy is not sensitivity or an emotion—it is a skill that you have."
"Most technology research is not research at all but at best focus group testing, and often lacks ethics."
"We have this piece of glass and there’s a person on the other side, but we don’t understand their purpose."
"You have to build all the puzzle pieces with clear summaries before the patterns come together in mental models."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We created Tiger teams that work like cancer cell hunters, targeting isolated problems and then dissolving after their work is done."
Maria GiudiceRemaking the Making Company: Moving from Product to Experience
June 9, 2016
"Product managers are responsible for value – making sure something valuable is being created that meets real needs."
Christian CrumlishAMA with Christian Crumlish, author of Product Management for UX People
March 24, 2022
"Why do we struggle to have impact even when we know we should?"
Rima Campbell Amrit S BhachuIncrease Productivity and Drive Business Impact
September 24, 2024
"Accessibility needs are a spectrum, not binary."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
June 10, 2022
"Empathy is not a single thing but a combination of intellectual understanding, emotional resonance, and compassionate action."
Victor UdoewaRadical Participatory Design: Decolonizing Participatory Design Processes
December 10, 2021
"If design, product, and development use different tools, we end up talking past one another."
Jon Fukuda Amy Evans Ignacio Martinez Joe MeersmanThe Big Question about Innovation: A Panel Discussion
September 25, 2024
"To be anti-racist, you must be trauma-informed; to be trauma-informed, you must commit to anti-racist work."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSWTrauma-Responsive Design: Reimagining the Future of Design Now
December 10, 2021
"Buffalo is actually designed for incidents like this to happen."
Kyria Stephens Marlon KernerPower to Heal: Civic Design in the Aftermath of Tragedy
November 17, 2022
"Autonomy means having confidence to make choices and affect ways of working."
Niko LaitinenAdaptable Org Design for Resilient Times
June 10, 2021
