Rosenverse
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young

Thursday, December 12, 2019 • Advancing Research Community

This video is featured in the UX Watch Party playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young
Speakers: Indi Young
Link:

Summary

In tech culture, everyone is hell-bent on coming up with answers and solutions. We all assume we know what the person’s problem is; rarely does tech culture start at the very beginning, understanding the variety of approaches real people have to their real purposes and different moods and contexts. Instead, we build an idea into experiments to see if it solves the imagined “problem.”

Sound familiar?

We can’t go on solving things based on our own thin understanding of how others perceive the problem. We can’t go on assuming everyone is in the same mood and context. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Indeed, we have done a lot of accidental harm in the world with the assumption that the tools we design are “neutral.” We need to get better at paying attention. We need to slow down and gather a richer, more nutritious understanding of the people we are trying to support. And we need to point a beam of light into possible future outcomes.

Let’s put equal emphasis on the problem. Spending equal time in the problem space generates rich understanding. Understanding the depths, perspectives, horizons and histories of the way people achieve their purposes opens up loads more opportunities. We can begin making solutions that eschew “engagement” to truly support different people in different ways.

The problem space deserves more attention and a slow cycle all of its own.

Key Insights

  • •

    Most organizations overemphasize solutions and ignore deep understanding of users’ purposes in the problem space.

  • •

    Big data correlations often lead to misleading conclusions if context and underlying reasoning aren’t explored.

  • •

    Demographic breakdowns like age or gender rarely capture the true diversity of user thinking and motivations.

  • •

    Thinking Styles are a more meaningful way to segment users based on their purposes and mental approaches.

  • •

    Listening sessions provide rich qualitative data necessary to build cognitive empathy and uncover deep user insights.

  • •

    Cognitive empathy is a skill that requires going beyond surface observations to understand people’s inner voices.

  • •

    Technology disciplines are immature compared to fields like architecture or museum design that prioritize varied user purposes.

  • •

    Most tech companies operate without proper ethical research oversight (e.g., institutional review boards).

  • •

    Jobs to Be Done is useful for strategy but inadequate alone without rich qualitative problem space research.

  • •

    Rich problem space research results remain valuable and relevant for years, unlike short-term solution testing data.

Notable Quotes

"We live in a solution culture that glorifies people who create solutions but not those who create knowledge."

"Correlation is not causation, and a lot of people in technology don’t understand that."

"Research theater is when results are designed just to create a reaction, not real understanding."

"Purpose is a super important word—understanding what a person is trying to get done, not just their behavior."

"You can’t meaningfully segment users by demographics alone if you want to support their real purposes."

"Cognitive empathy only forms with depth; you can’t build it at the surface level."

"Empathy is not sensitivity or an emotion—it is a skill that you have."

"Most technology research is not research at all but at best focus group testing, and often lacks ethics."

"We have this piece of glass and there’s a person on the other side, but we don’t understand their purpose."

"You have to build all the puzzle pieces with clear summaries before the patterns come together in mental models."

Ask the Rosenbot
Dante Guintu
How to Crush the Talent Crunch
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Ebru Namaldi
Designing the Designer’s Journey: Scaling Teams, Culture, and Growth Through DesignOps
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Reginé Gilbert
Asking the Right Questions: Life, Hope and Moving Forward During the Pandemic
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Jennifer Strickland
Adopting a "Design By" Method
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Ned Gartside
Navigating accessibility and climate
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Nathan Shedroff
Double Your Mileage: Use Your Research Strategically
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Farid Sabitov
Automatization for Large Enterprise Teams
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Michele Marut
Research Repositories Reconsidered
2019 • DesignOps Community
Marissa Cui
Climate Design Product Showcase
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Ali Jeffery
How DesignOps Helped Enable Wall Street to Work Remotely
2020 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Jason Mesut
Unmasking Design Leadership: Navigating leadership without neglecting ourselves
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Savannah Carlin
Don't botch the bot: Designing interactions for AI
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Cartography for Design Communities
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Peter Merholz
The 2025 State of UX/Design Organizational Health
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Meredith Black
Building Community and Common Trends to Look for in 2021
2020 • DesignOps Community

More Videos

Nancy Douyon

"Google’s photo algorithm mistakenly tagged Black people as gorillas, which was called out by Jackie Elsene."

Nancy Douyon

We'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex

June 15, 2018

Jack Behar

"We help teams onboard their coded components onto the UXPin platform so they can be enabled with component-driven prototyping."

Jack Behar

How to Build Prototypes that Behave like an End-Product

December 6, 2022

Jorge Arango

"Politics and ego conflicts are inevitable and separate challenges that seriously impact merger integration."

Jorge Arango

Meeting of the Waters: Designing for Successful Inorganic Growth

August 12, 2021

Jon White

"No more than five key insights — any more and teams start going off in different directions."

Jon White Erin May

Unsticking Research for Better Information Flow

March 11, 2026

Jessamyn Edwards

"Tracking complaints and fixing things immediately, even if it’s just one person, is a mark of good UX impact."

Jessamyn Edwards

Surviving Your UX Career in Enterprise Design

December 2, 2021

Stefanie Owens

"Build better foundations, not better facades."

Stefanie Owens

Optimizing for Outcomes: Transformation Design in Systems at Scale

December 4, 2024

Ron Bronson

"Friction can be good, especially when protecting private information."

Ron Bronson

Design, Consequences & Everyday Life

November 18, 2022

Louis Rosenfeld

"We took thousands of hours of curated content and built a chatbot around it so it’s not garbage in, garbage out."

Louis Rosenfeld

The Rosenbot and the Rosenverse: An AMA with Lou Rosenfeld

June 5, 2024

Ash Brown

"Collaboration is not just beneficial, it's essential for effective climate action."

Ash Brown

Silver Linings: What DesignOps Learned in the Shift to WFH

October 23, 2020

Latest Books All books