Accessible only to conference ticket holders.
Log in Create account Buy conference recordings
For 90 days after a conference, only paid ticket holders can watch conference videos. After that, all Gold members have access.
If you have purchased recording access and cannot see the video, please contact support.
Summary
In-person research has been squeezed for years. It’s viewed as expensive, slow, and hard to scale. As AI accelerates everything else, the temptation is to automate away human time in the field, for the sake of speed. I contend that AI’s real opportunity lies in depth, not just speed. We’re getting distracted by speed, and failing to see the potential of depth. In this talk, I argue that AI gives us the rare opportunity to restore depth to qualitative research. Instead of treating automation as a shortcut, we used AI tools to absorb labour-intensive tasks (cleaning transcripts, tagging footage, structuring notes etc) so we could reinvest that time in what remains the most data-dense method in our practice: immersive, in-person ethnography. I’ll draw on three recent consulting projects I directed: 1. In-home health research in Atlanta 2. Retail ethnography across London, Hamburg, and Milan 3. A follow-on multi-city retail study in London, Paris, Berlin, and Milan By redirecting AI-generated time savings into deeper fieldwork, we expanded ethnographic activities: from extended “deep hanging out” (to borrow Clifford Geertz’s phrase) to ethnographic journaling and collaborative interpretation moments in-field. I’ll also share how we brought non-research stakeholders into the field, and why AI was essential in making that investment possible — transforming not just insights, but internal conviction and cross-functional alignment. My goal for the audience is to come away from the talk inspired and motivated. I want people to use AI tools to help mitigate all the usual tradeoffs we as researchers have had to make over the years when conducting in-person research.
Key Insights
-
•
AI tools can significantly accelerate pre-fieldwork preparation by quickly synthesizing existing research to onboard new team members faster.
-
•
Reallocating time saved by AI from administrative tasks into more immersive, participatory in-field research enhances empathy and context.
-
•
Including more senior researchers in the field becomes possible by offloading transcript and data processing to AI, increasing research track capacity.
-
•
Dialectical analysis with AI (hypothesis testing and disproving) speeds up sense-making and yields stronger storylines.
-
•
Immersion activities informed by AI-optimized planning can deepen researcher insight by using body and emotional awareness as data.
-
•
Bringing clients into daily AI-assisted analysis sessions in the field fosters better participation, alignment, and earlier ideation.
-
•
Transparency about AI usage with clients is crucial, especially in tech sectors where AI adoption is both expected and monitored.
-
•
Rapid AI experimentation through sprints and collaboration with data science teams helps tailor AI use efficiently to research workflows.
-
•
Current AI limitations remain in highly tailored deliverables like proposals, requiring human refinement despite AI-assisted drafting.
-
•
Clients become advocates of research when engaged firsthand, which supports sustaining deep research in cost-conscious environments.
Notable Quotes
"The core thesis is that saving time with AI and reallocating it into research itself unlocks the true potential of the field."
"It often feels like research becomes beholden to exact quotes rather than the richer story that context provides, what I call the tyranny of transcripts."
"We used AI tools like NotebookLM and Gemini primarily to shortcut getting up to speed and managing transcripts, without focusing on specific tools themselves."
"Adding a senior researcher, Izzy, in field meant we could have more, smaller research tracks and better support for research newbies."
"Our AI-supported mornings were no longer about just dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s, but deeper analysis sessions including clients."
"In this context, sometimes slower is actually faster because it allows going deeper and unlocking more meaningful insights."
"For many of our tech clients, there’s a demand not just to use AI but to transparently show how and why, to respond to internal scrutiny."
"We experimented with AI-powered sprints, but had lots of dead ends and false starts before finding what really works for us."
"AI can’t yet fully replace bespoke and careful proposal building, though it helps junior researchers draft the first outlines."
"When clients join us in the field and experience research deeply, they often become advocates who come back for more."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"You cannot just put this 5% of users did not want this without knowing why or where this insight came from."
Maria Rosala Shivanjali M.Research Repositories
March 12, 2026
"Technology helps efficiency but cannot replace human connection—eye contact and handshake remain essential."
Iram ShahClosing Keynote: The View from the Top
June 4, 2019
"Our modern way of life is actually really dependent on satellites."
Michal Anne RogondinoSaving Outer Space: The First UX Design System for Our Nation’s Satellites
January 8, 2024
"Moving fast into prototyping helps keep momentum going beyond the fun ideation phase to actual implementation."
Stephanie WadeBuilding and Sustaining Design in Government
December 8, 2021
"Creating safety requires specific, behavioral agreements you can observe and practice."
Alla WeinbergDesign Teams Need Psychological Safety: Here’s How to Create It
September 9, 2022
"Staff working against long backlogs are inherently stretched for time, so engagement needs to be efficient and sensitive."
Ed MullenDesigning the Unseen: Enabling Institutions to Build Public Trust
November 16, 2022
"If you measure an infinite number of customers, every change would be statistically significant, but not every change would be meaningful."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"Academic Purists believe one size fits all, ignoring context and stifling innovation."
Jason Mesut Martina Hodges-Schell Jose CoronadoUnmasking Design Leadership: Navigating leadership without neglecting ourselves
October 30, 2025
"When you encounter an obstacle, how do you respond? Maybe it’s an invitation to grow."
Emily EagleCan't Rewind: Radio and Retail
June 3, 2019
