Key Insights

• •

  Both iOS and Android have strong accessibility features, but their screen readers differ: Android offers multiple options and high customizability, while iOS provides one consistent but configurable screen reader.

• •

  Customization is critical in accessibility because users have unique needs and preferences; one size does not fit all.

• •

  Using a screen reader effectively requires skill and muscle memory developed over years, making it difficult for novices to accurately test accessibility by themselves.

• •

  Developers and designers testing screen readers on their own often misunderstand user experiences, sometimes seeing accessibility as harder than it actually is for experienced users.

• •

  Testing with real users who rely on assistive tech provides rich, actionable insights that cannot be replaced by simulated testing or personas.

• •

  Fable facilitates accessibility by providing training (Fable Upskill) and connecting teams with real users remotely (Fable Engage) for practical research and testing.

• •

  VoiceOver on iOS relies heavily on gestures like swipe to navigate elements and double tap to activate, which can be customized extensively including speech rate and voice.

• •

  Apple’s screen curtain is a privacy and battery-saving feature that blanks the screen while still providing audio feedback.

• •

  Conducting virtual accessibility research is feasible and effective, especially supported by platforms like Fable that allow video, audio, and screen sharing with assistive tech users.

• •

  Accessibility advocacy should focus on integrating real user feedback into all stages of a product lifecycle, not just technical compliance checks.

Notable Quotes