Summary
Imagine working at a large company where there is no single design organization. Instead, it feels like an archipelago of design islands. Some large islands with an organization of designers and researchers. Others are smaller islands of just one team. And even, UX teams of one floating on rafts in between. Without a map, those islands are only aware of their immediate surroundings. How can we bring the company wide design community of practice together if we don’t even know where to find each other? This was my experience when I did my first design community mapping project. In this talk, I’ll share how we ended up crowdsourcing our design community map, and how it became an invaluable resource for the internal design community of practice. I’ll compare the differences for visualizing and thinking about organizations with a traditional org chart compared to a community map. Further, I’ll share how I brought my cartography skills with me to a new company, where I felt lost without a map, and why this map is my most important DesignOps tool.
Key Insights
-
•
Traditional org charts and HR systems often fail to accurately represent who is on design teams due to outdated or incomplete data.
-
•
Mapping people as circles in a cohesive team layout fosters a stronger sense of belonging than lists or rectangles.
-
•
Crowdsourcing map updates within a design community increases map accuracy and reveals hidden teams or individuals.
-
•
Using component libraries in design tools allows scalable, easy updates to people maps and supports multiple visual models from the same data.
-
•
Maps help new hires orient themselves faster via 'map tours,' accelerating network-building and onboarding.
-
•
People maps create a shared mental model of design teams across the company, aiding cross-team understanding and collaboration.
-
•
Duplicating maps for different use cases enables answering operational questions such as identifying domain experts or assessing org health.
-
•
Ops-managed maps ensure ongoing accuracy when design ops leads actively maintain them, balancing against purely crowdsourced approaches.
-
•
Design ops cartography is a superpower that lifts the fog of organizational complexity, turning hidden knowledge into shared understanding.
-
•
Flexible visual metaphors (circles, rectangles) combined with auto-layout improve efficiency and clarity in visualizing teams and projects.
Notable Quotes
"Who works here anyways? I knew about immediate teams but beyond that, it was a fog."
"Representing a person as a circle feels more right—like we’re all equidistant at the same table."
"I call this an anti org chart because it’s organic, messy, and structures emerge rather than imposed."
"Crowdsourcing the map meant anyone in our community practice could edit, and it worked beautifully."
"These islands of design were close together or far away; our map brought them all closer."
"Publishing a component library means anyone can update titles or roles, and it updates everywhere at once."
"Map tours are my favorite thing—taking a new hire on a guided walk of the entire community."
"Duplicating the map lets me answer ops questions like who are our UX domain experts or how design ops is structured."
"Starting a new job with no map felt lost; so I built a new map as my BYO orientation."
"When we don’t have the people modeling we need, we have to make it ourselves to lift the fog."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Make me a dashboard, no matter what, is the one thing I've heard more than anything else for 20 years."
Theresa NeilJust Build Me a Dashboard!
April 9, 2019
"If you walk in someone else’s shoes, then you’ve taken their shoes."
Sahibzada MayedThe Politics of Radical Research: A Manifesto
March 27, 2023
"I message participants regularly during studies to reduce no-shows and troubleshoot any issues immediately."
Lily Aduana Savannah Hobbs Brittany Rutherford5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
March 12, 2021
"We didn’t have enough knowledge initially to have a strong opinion about what was good design for these users."
David CroninThe GE Design System and Thoughts about Craft at Scale
May 13, 2015
"Change is a game of inches; we take two steps forward, six steps back."
Jacqui Frey Alison RandSetting the Table for Dynamic Change
October 24, 2019
"The marketplace is going to decide if it’s close enough in cost-benefit tradeoff."
Daniel J. RosenbergDesigning with and for Artificial Intelligence
August 11, 2022
"When sharing prototypes that aren't accessible, facilitators may need to control the prototype and follow user directions."
Kate KalcevichIntegrating Accessibility in DesignOps
September 23, 2024
"We are in the process of growing and maturing the design system before we open it to the public."
Bob Baxley Sara Asche Anderson Sharon Bautista Frank Duran Jamie Kaspszak Abbey Smalley Sylas SouzaTheme 4: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"Our commitment as researchers is to adapt existing techniques and create new ones rooted in Latin America’s context."
Verónica Urzúa Jorge MontielThe B-side of the Research Impact
March 12, 2021
